Jump to content
The World News Media

Should I Watch Music Videos?


JAMMY

Recommended Posts

  • Member

g03 2/22 p. 19

Quote

Young People Ask . . .

Should I Watch Music Videos?

“Music videos are great. Some of them are like minimovies. They tell a story, and I admire the choreography.”—Casey.

“They’re a good way to find new music. They expose you to more than the regular top-40 music. Also, music videos can be good conversation pieces.”—Josh.

“Details in a video are important to me—who is singing, what she’s wearing, how she acts. All these combine to shed light on the meaning of the lyrics.”—Kimberly.

“I like to see what my favorite bands are going to do this time. I love the special effects. And some videos are funny. But you have to be careful.”—Sam.

PERHAPS you too enjoy watching music videos. When they first appeared on the television scene, they were relatively simple low-budget productions. But as music videos proved that they were no passing fad and that they had an enormous impact on record sales, they rapidly became increasingly sophisticated, artistically and technically. Today they are an important part of the music world and have proved to be immensely popular among young people. In some lands there are TV stations devoted exclusively to the showing of music videos!

But why do youths such as Sam, who is quoted here, say that there is a need to be careful? Could it be that some music videos might have a negative effect on you—perhaps corrupting your thinking and moral values or even damaging your relationship with your Creator? Such a question may seem a bit extreme. But think, If you were going for a swim in a lake or in the ocean and saw signs proclaiming that it was hazardous or dangerous to swim there, would it be smart to brush off such warnings? Hardly. Well, then, it will prove wise on your part to consider some warnings regarding music videos.

Danger Zones

You need to acknowledge the fact that what you see and hear can affect you! The Bible tells us that Israel’s first king, Saul, used music beneficially—to soothe his emotions. (1 Samuel 16:14-23) Could music also have a negative effect? The book Rock and Roll—Its History and Stylistic Development makes this point: “One cannot have it both ways. If we acknowledge that rock music has had positive effects (as it has), we must also be willing to admit that it has had negative effects (as it has). The person who proudly proclaims ‘Oh, I listen to the music, but it doesn’t affect me’ is either hopelessly naive or grossly ill informed.”

The Bible repeatedly points to the influence that the eye has on our thinking and emotions. (Proverbs 27:20; 1 John 2:16) So by adding powerful visual elements to music, video producers dramatically increase the effects that music has on its listeners. What kinds of visual elements are commonly used?

According to one study, about 57 percent of rock videos contain violent acts. About 76 percent include representations of sexual activities. Another recent analysis found that 75 percent of concept videos (videos that tell a story) also involved sexual imagery, and more than half involved violence, usually against women. Now, could watching such videos really harm you? One reference points out that “experimental studies have found that viewing music videos may, in fact, influence adolescents’ attitudes concerning early or risky sexual activity.” And there is no denying that as musicians try to outshock their predecessors and their peers, music videos in general are becoming increasingly graphic.

One expert in the field of education observed: “Many argue that what they hear—and see, thanks to music videos—is no different than the musical influences of past generations . . . But it seems that the majority of today’s artists cavalierly embrace profanity and outrageousness as acceptable tools to increase record sales.” And Chicago magazine says of those who watch a certain music video channel: “What they get is a nonstop blitz of aggressively suggestive soft-core porn.”

Chicago magazine also describes a music video in which “a young man sitting at the counter in a diner leans his head back a little too far. A huge bloodred gash appears in his neck and the head falls off.” Another video reportedly showed a man doing a gory striptease, during which he also removed his flesh and muscles. Other things too shocking to report were depicted.

Now some may dismiss these facts, claiming that the videos described here are extreme and that most are not really so bad. Some may even argue that they don’t find music videos to be particularly shocking or offensive. But might that not simply suggest that repeated viewing of such videos has desensitized those individuals? Casey, the young man quoted at the outset, admits: “If you don’t put limits on what you watch, what was at first outrageous eventually becomes mundane. Unconsciously, you look to the next level and passively accept what you used to find shocking.”

What may result? Your ability to make sound moral decisions may be severely impaired. Because our minds can so easily be influenced in a negative way, the Bible exhorts us to “safeguard practical wisdom and thinking ability.” (Proverbs 3:21; 5:2) Another negative result could be damage to your friendship with Jehovah God. Is that not your most precious possession? You therefore need to safeguard that friendship by taking measures to avoid improper entertainment of any kind. How can you do so?

Protecting Yourself

First, please accept that it is simply wrong to watch scenes that flaunt what the Bible clearly condemns. (Psalm 11:5; Galatians 5:19-21; Revelation 21:8) When a video glorifies things that do not ‘befit holy people,’ you must be determined to stop watching. (Ephesians 5:3, 4) Admittedly, changing the channel—or turning the TV off—may not be easy when an exciting video is playing. So you may need to pray as did the psalmist who wrote: “Make my eyes pass on from seeing what is worthless.”—Psalm 119:37.

You may naturally recoil from videos that are as shocking as the ones we described earlier. However, some videos seem to be more subtle in their approach. Scenes of sexuality may be brief or fleeting. The lyrics and visuals may be artfully orchestrated to promote some ungodly viewpoint without ever saying or showing anything explicit. Nevertheless, if you feel vaguely guilty for having watched a certain video, it was likely unwholesome or unchristian in some way. How, then, can you go about deciding what to watch and what to avoid when issues of propriety are not clear-cut?

Of course, whether you watch music videos at all is a matter for your personal decision and that of your parents, who have the responsibility for deciding what you can and cannot watch. (Ephesians 6:1, 2) But if your parents allow you to watch music videos, you need to be guided by more than what feels right to you. Hebrews 5:14 encourages us to ‘train our perceptive powers’ to ‘distinguish right and wrong.’ Our powers of perception are trained by studying Bible principles, which provide a structure for determining what is good and what is bad from Jehovah’s viewpoint. By meditating on such Bible principles, you will be able to recognize what is hazardous to your spiritual health, even when there is no particular Bible rule to guide you.

Specifically, then, what Bible principles can guide you in regard to watching music videos? This will be discussed in a future article.

[Blurb on page 20]

“The person who proudly proclaims ‘Oh, I listen to the music, but it doesn’t affect me’ is either hopelessly naive or grossly ill informed”

[Pictures on page 21]

Can you really watch something unwholesome and not be affected by it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 472
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.