Jump to content

91 topics in this forum

    • 2 replies
    • 430 views

    • 1 reply
    • 111 views
  1. Guest Nicole

    Abrázame

    • 0 replies
    • 225 views
  2. Guest Nicole
    • 0 replies
    • 383 views
  3. Guest Nicole
    • 1 reply
    • 328 views
  4. Guest

    Solamente una Vez

    • 1 reply
    • 330 views
  5. Guest

    El Reloj

    • 1 reply
    • 271 views
  6. Guest Nicole
    Guest

    Usted Es La Culpable

    • 1 reply
    • 491 views
  7. Guest

    Contigo Aprendí

    • 0 replies
    • 245 views
  8. Guest Nicole
    Guest

    La Media Vuelta

    • 2 replies
    • 421 views
  9. Guest

    Nos hizo falta tiempo

    • 0 replies
    • 279 views
  10. Guest

    Suave

    • 0 replies
    • 320 views
  11. Guest

    Todo y Nada

    • 0 replies
    • 248 views
  12. Guest

    Delirio

    • 0 replies
    • 255 views
  13. Guest

    Bésame Mucho

    • 4 replies
    • 227 views
  14. Guest

    Sueña

    • 0 replies
    • 210 views
  15. Guest

    Te Desean

    • 0 replies
    • 197 views
  16. Guest

    Luis Miguel

    • 1 reply
    • 366 views
    • 2 replies
    • 584 views
  17. Guest Nicole

    Ahora te puedes marchar

    • 1 reply
    • 525 views
  18. Guest Nicole
    • 0 replies
    • 248 views
  19. Guest Nicole

    Y

    • 0 replies
    • 252 views
  20. Guest Nicole

    Oro de Ley

    • 0 replies
    • 312 views
  21. Guest Nicole

    Un Hombre Busca Una Mujer

    • 0 replies
    • 293 views
  22. Guest Nicole

    Más

    • 3 replies
    • 361 views
  23. Guest Nicole

    Amarte Es Un Placer

    • 0 replies
    • 447 views
  24. Guest Nicole

    Hasta que me olvides

    • 0 replies
    • 242 views
    • 0 replies
    • 405 views
    • 1 reply
    • 484 views
    • 0 replies
    • 303 views




  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Absolutely agree. But what I see as it is possible to read in WT Society text about Higher education is this: They tend to separate young minds from "secular knowledge" because of some fears. Perhaps one of fear is not main reason, to be learned about non-Bible ideas. But as main reason i see how this "secular ideas" can cause that young JW members begin to question WT and Bible.  Please have in mind what you already said, JHVH not decided to separate Congregation, but He doing just opposite. He let all sort of influence to be spread on  people, all people, not just JW's. If JHVH not made separation in literal way, than WT try to do this separation in limited level on limited class of people for limited time in their life - looks funny and not productive as they expect.  This was completely necessary to be said ... using this sort of illustration with mafia as subject :))))) ........... but you "provoked" me a little :)))) and i will add. We all working for devil the boss, because he is ruler, god of this world, global company/corporation. Just another, different way of rationalization.   :))))))
    • I agree that God is organized, which is clear in creation.  He has also organized his anointed Body of “144,000” perfectly, by distributing gifts in various measure. All are to benefit from each other.  (1 Cor chapter 12)  And he himself gave some as apostles and some as prophets and some as evangelists and some as pastors and teachers 12 for the equipping of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all reach the unity of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to a measure of the maturity of the fullness of Christ.  Eph 4:11-13 In Matt 13:36-43 it says, “The Son of Man will send out his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all the causes of sin and those who do lawless deeds” Matt 13:41 Jesus stated that his kingdom is “no part of this world”. John 18:36  His kingdom is comprised of the anointed – those part of his Body.  He is the “Lord of lords and King of kings”.  Rev 17:14 (Matt 20:21)    And they were singing a new song, saying, “You are worthy to take the scroll     and to open its seals, because you were slaughtered,     and bought people for God by your blood     from every tribe and language and people and nation, 10 and made them a kingdom and priests to our God,     and they will reign on the earth.” Rev 5:9,10 (1 Pet 2:5,9) Matt 13:37,38 – “So he answered and said, “The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man, 38 and the field is the world. And the good seed—these are the sons of the kingdom, but the darnel are the sons of the evil one.” If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. Gal 3:29 We know that not all of God’s anointed become faithful members of the Bride.  They can fall from their heavenly position. 2 Pet 3:17; Rev 8:10,11  This harvest firstly concerns those belonging to Christ, who are part of his kingdom and are found either as good seed or weeds.  I hope you can see that Matt 13:36-43 has nothing to do with the all the kingdoms on the earth and the people in them.  (Luke 4:5-7)  In Matt 13:38; It does say, “the field is the world” – but world can mean, “an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution” which describes the anointed arrangement of "kings" under their Head Jesus Christ.  John 4:23,24 -   Jesus said right before these scriptures:   “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem.” John 4:21 Christ’s Body replaced the temple in Jerusalem.  There is no more literal, physical place of worship, since the Temple is now built with “living stones”.  1 Pet 2:5,9   They are given “spirit” and “truth”.  1 John 2:20,27; John 16:13  If they fail in their devotion to God and Christ, they lose what has been given them.  Luke 8:18; 1 Cor 3:18  They will not be sealed into the tribes of “Israel”.    Luke 13:24; Rev 3:11 Again in Rev 18:4, “my people”, refer to God’s holy people – His “special possession”.  They and their companions with them are to leave the “organization” where the “darnel” are teaching His people, lies. Rev 18:4-8 (1 Pet 2:5,9,10)      
    • I don't know if anyone provided an update to this story, but the "brother" finally pled guilty, and was sentenced to five years, for three felony counts of child rape with two different victims. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-who-raped-jehovah-s-witness-girls-sentenced-5-years-n1082136 Elihu Rodriguez, 32, of Yakima, Washington, was given five years, the maximum sentence prosecutors had asked for, after Rodriguez pleaded guilty to three felony counts of child rape in the third degree in September. He was also ordered to register as a sex offender. Both of his victims attended the sentencing, which took place Friday at the King County Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, Washington. I believe this was the case I was told something about in 2018, which is why I mentioned then that I couldn't say much because it was an upcoming court case. If it's the same one, then someone (parent?) convinced her not to report it because it was just a matter that this 25-year-old was in love with her, and so they told her it was actually multiple acts of fornication, not child abuse or child rape. She agreed not to report on the basis that she would be considered guilty of fornication, too. So the family moved to another congregation, and within months, she got to a point where she decided she needed to report it to the elders. (I don't think it was because she learned about another girl being raped/abused by the man, even though this would make sense.) When she did report it to her new congregation's elders in 2013, they actually called the legal department just as they were supposed to, but evidently someone thought it was going to be possible to treat this as "consensual" and the elders tried to get her to say it was consensual. She refused to agree with the elders that it was consensual, and took it to the authorities. When I heard about this case (or perhaps another one just like it) I was only told the general area of the US, and some circumstances, but no names. I was only told that this was disturbing that someone would try to turn a child molestation case of a "16 year old girl" into a consensual case in spite of the young age. (I was not told that she was actually 14/15.) Years earlier, J R Brown, as a spokesmen for the Society, had tried to minimize a lot of these cases by saying that a lot of them are like cases of an 18 year old boy with a 16 year old girl, which sounded a bit like the old "boys will be boys" excuse. 
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      16,501
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    didiervaissiere
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      61,650
    • Total Posts
      114,344
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.