Jump to content
The World News Media

Priistas hostigan, amenazan y expulsan a pobladores de San Francisco del Mar

Guest Nicole

By Guest Nicole
in Tema

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

Ciudadanos que no simpatizan con el PRI en la localidad situada en el Itsmo de Tehuantepec son hostigados hasta la expulsión, en algunos casos.

francisco-del-mar.jpg

Regeneración 01 de julio de 2016.- Con una denuncia en el Ministerio Público, el pescador Ulises Vicente Rasgado, habitante de la comunidad, dijo que sufrió hostigamientos de parte del agente municipal Nicolás Andrés Enríquez, su cabildo y del representante del PRI, Froilán Gaspar Pérez.

En su denuncia, Vicente Rasgado, indicó que el pasado 5 de junio intentaron presionarlo para que votara por el Revolucionario Institucional y desde que se negó lo hostigaron y amenazaron, ahora tiene miedo de ser expulsado de su comunidad.

“Yo lo único que hago es pescar, sin embargo por no votar por el PRI me quieren expulsar, estoy pensando mejor irme del pueblo y emprender nuevos retos, es imposible vivir con miedo, con tensión de que a uno lo maten”, expresó.

En otro caso, Jesús Martínez, comerciante, fue obligado a votar por el PRI, pero su hija y su esposa se abstuvieron; como castigo, en asamblea decidieron que nadie compraría en su tienda de abarrotes.

Además, el tendero deberá pagar 500 pesos y cárcel, lo que él considera una violación a sus derechos humanos.

“Hace dos años, cuando ganó el Partido Unidad Popular (PUP) en San Francisco del Mar, lo mismo hicieron, expulsaron a 14 ciudadanos entre ellos a Carlos Ocampo, quién por no votar por el PRI lo obligaron a cambiar su tortillería del pueblo abandonando su casa y bienes”, expresó Martínez.

El caso no es nuevo, de hecho, una buena parte de la población del lugar son Testigos de Jehová y debido a que no votan, automáticamente se les han negado el servicio de agua potable, se los han cortado por tiempo indefinido.

Para Fulvio Nieto Martínez quién también es testigo de Jehová ganarse la vida en Pueblo Viejo no es fácil, por no votar por el PRI, también lo castigaron para ganarse la comida de su familia en el mar y fue suspendido de entrar a la Playa Vicente y por si fuera poco, en asamblea decidieron que ninguna persona lo contratará para servicios de balconería.

“Ahora recibo despensas de mis hermanos de la religión, confió en Dios que pronto se resuelva esa injusticia, lo mismo pasa con Israel Francisco Gómez otro hermano de la religión, quién regresó de los Estados Unidos y por no votar el 5 de junio la asamblea decidió que nadie lo contrate para servicios de carpintería”, expresó.

Un profesor jubilado de nombre Alejo Ventura después de vivir fuera muchos años y concluir con su labor de dirigente sindical de la sección 22, regresó a vivir a su natal Pueblo Viejo y por no coincidir con las formas en que se conducen en las asambleas, los priistas le cortaron el agua potable a su casa.

El caso de Natividad Gómez de oficio panadera y de Teresa Vargas vendedora de comida y antojitos es triste, viven reprimidas y hostigadas, ambas no votar el 5 de junio y ahora nadie les compra lo que venden.

“Estamos muy tristes por la represión que hacen estas personas, no se puede vivir así, exigimos a las autoridades de Derechos Humanos, defensores sociales a que visiten esta zona huave, hay mucha injusticia, demasiada diría, no podemos así y lo más triste y desolador es que el 5 de junio ganó el PRI, seguramente seremos otras expulsadas, como les fue a nuestros 14 paisanos”, indicaron.

Los opositores del PRI, hombres y mujeres hicieron un llamado a las autoridades defensoras de Derechos Humanos a hacer valer su derecho como ciudadano libre, porque hostigado y reprimido además de amenazado y expulsado no se puede vivir en plenitud.

En la agencia municipal de San Francisco del Mar, Pueblo Viejo habitan cerca de 900 indígenas ikotjs a quienes el terror ha invadido principalmente en aquellos que no simpatizan con el Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), son 14 pobladores los que han sido expulsados desde el 2014, decenas viven hostigados y amenazados y a otros más no se les permite realizar su única actividad, la pesca.

Fuente: http://regeneracion.mx/priistas-hostigan-amenazan-y-expulsan-a-pobladores-de-san-francisco-del-mar/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 470
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

Posted Images

 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Found it, thanks. You are correct.
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In the era of the Bible Students within the Watchtower, there were numerous beginnings. It is essential to bear in mind that each congregation functioned autonomously, granting the Elders the freedom to assert their own assertions and interpretations. Most people embraced the principles that Pastor Russell was trying to convey. You could argue that what you are experiencing now, they also experienced back then. The key difference is that unity was interpreted differently. Back then it had value where today there is none. To address your inquiry, while I cannot recall the exact details, it is believed to have been either 4129 or 4126. Some groups, however, adopted Ussher's 4004. It is worth mentioning that they have now discarded it and revised it to either 3954 or 3958, although I personally find little interest in this matter. I believe I encountered this information in the book titled "The Time is at Hand," though it may also be referenced in their convention report. Regardless, this is part of their compelling study series 3. Please take a moment to review and confirm the date. I am currently focused on Riblah. The Bible Students who firmly believe that Israel is the prophetic sign of Armageddon have made noteworthy adjustments to their chronology. They have included significant dates such as 1947/8 and 1967/8, as well as more recent dates. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that, according to their calculations, 2024 holds immense importance. The ongoing tension of Iran targeting Israel directly from its own territory amplifies the gravity of the situation. If their trajectory continues, the subsequent captivating event will occur in 2029, rather than as previously speculated, in 2034 by some.

  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.3k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Techredirector
    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.