Jump to content
The World News Media

Experts Decry Russia’s Threat to Ban the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures


The Librarian

Recommended Posts


  • Views 2.5k
  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This is Part 2 of a three-part series based on exclusive interviews with noted scholars of religion, politics, and sociology, as well as experts in Soviet and post-Soviet studies. Source

  • Guest

Trial of New Testament begins

CUSTOMS CASTS DOUBT ON NEW TESTAMENT


Court proceedings begin regarding seizure of religious literature
by Dmitry Marakulin Kommersant, 16 November 2016
 
Consideration of an administrative case, in which the religious organization "Gideons Association of Evangelical Christians" is challenging the action of Vyborg customs, which in the summer of this year seized a press run of the New Testament and Psalms, began in the Vyborg city court of Leningrad province. Customs officials suspected that the literature being imported from Finland is extremist. However, as the Gideons' attorney told Kommersant—St. Petersburg, his clients have all necessary documents confirming the correspondence of the texts to the canonical translation.
 
Today at the session of the Vyborg court of Leningrad province it was revealed that the plaintiffs are asking that the requirements of Vyborg customs for presenting additional documents and the decision to conduct a psycho-linguistic expert analysis of the seized literature be found to be illegal.
 
According to the assistant to the director of the Gideons Association of Evangelical Christians, Vladimir Shakhmatov, the incident occurred in the night of 7-8 July. Two automobiles were transporting into Russia through the Brusnichnoe (Vyborg district of Leningrad province) customs post a press run of the New Testaments and Psalms that was printed in Finland. Upon examination, an excess of weight of 2 percent of what was declared was discovered. Both autos were sent to temporary storage for offloading the literature. Mr. Shakhmatov said that he was then told that it was necessary to transfer the books for an expert analysis in order to clarify whether the contents of the New Testament and Psalms were extremist. "We have the conclusion of the Herzen Pedagogical University that indicates that the texts of the books correspond to the Synodal translation, but that did not help. We wrote an appeal against the actions of the customs officials all the way up to the president of Russia," Vladimir Shakhmatov explained. According to information of the plaintiffs, seizure of the press run caused a deterioration of the literature: about 20,000 books that were being transported in their car were damaged by moisture.
 
The Gideons Association of Evangelical Christians is an inter-church organization that distributes the Bible for free. The books are printed in accordance with the officially approved text of that country where the religious literature is distribution. In Russia this is the Synodal translation, approved in the 19th century by the Holy Ruling Synod for home reading.
 
As the Gideons' attorney Anatoly Pchelintsev explained for Kommersant—St. Petersburg (he also represents the interests of the former prosecutor of Leningrad province, Stanislav Ivanov, who is accused of taking bribes), his clients presented to Vyborg customs officials a whole package of documents specified in part 3 of article 182 of the Customs Code and documents from the Federal Agency for Printed and Mass Communication, confirming that the books being imported are not publications of an advertising or erotic nature. Nevertheless, the chief of the Brusnichnoe customs post, Sergei Lenin, according to the attorney, demanded of the Gideons' attorneys confirmation that the publications do not contain information that falls under the purview of the federal law "On combating extremist activity." "I recall that there is in the same law to which customs appeals an explicit provision that the sacred texts of several religious, including the Bible, cannot be ruled to be extremist," Mr. Pchelintsev noted.
 
Yesterday it was reported that the psycho-linguistic expert analysis will be conducted by an individual entrepreneur from Murmansk, Mikhail Laktinov. Anatoly Pchelintsev explained that the authorization poses about 20 questions like the following: do the submitted materials contain information associated with restriction or infringement of the person, rights, and liberties of citizens or associated with requiring or encouraging potential or actual members of a congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses to distance themselves from institutions of civil society (family, marriage, etc.)? This question surprised Vladimir Shakhmatov, who suggested that the Vyborg customs does not at all see differences among various religious organizations.
 
The director of the communications section of the St. Petersburg metropolitanate, Natalia Rodomanova, told Kommersant—St. Petersburg that "if the text (of the seized books—Kommersant) corresponds to the Synodal translation, then there are no grounds for finding the books to be extremist literature." In her opinion, with an appropriate request the St. Petersburg metropolitanate would be able to provide help to the security agencies. For example, to receive an expert opinion of a specialist on biblical texts of the St. Petersburg Ecclesiastical Academy and to give his conclusion about the disputed literature.

In Russia this is the Synodal translation, approved in the 19th century by the Holy Ruling Synod for home reading
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

    • Natacha Rice

      Natacha Rice 1

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mark Watson

      Mark Watson 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BGR

      BGR 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.