Jump to content
The World News Media

Exmiembros de los Testigos de Jehová denunciarán a la entidad por no entregarles documentos sobre abusos a menores

Guest Nicole

By Guest Nicole
in Tema

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

El colectivo AbusosTJ, que representa a exmiembros de los Testigos de Jehová que denuncian casos de abusos sexuales en las congregaciones, presentarán una denuncia contra la entidad al no aportarles unos documentos sobre casos de abusos que habían solicitado y que, según precisan, guardan "en sobres y archivos clandestinos". Según señalan, en España, "decenas" de víctimas han contactado con ellos.

Los miembros de este colectivo Miguel García López e Israel Florez, han acudido este lunes 16 de enero a la sede nacional de los Testigos de Jehová en Ajalvir (Madrid) tras haber requerido a través de un burofax con contenido certificado al presidente de la Junta Directiva nacional de los Testigos de Jehová en España la entrega de "todos los documentos secretos que guarda la confesión sobre sus casos de abusos de menores".

El colectivo ha indicado que han recibido una respuesta negativa a su petición y que no han sido atendidos por ningún directivo o cargo eclesiástico de la confesión, por lo que han comunicado al recepcionista que presentarán una denuncia.

Los miembros de Abusos TJ piden "reparación y justicia", el cambio de todos los protocolos "secretos" impuestos por el Cuerpo Gobernante de los testigos de Jehová y que se indique "de manera clara" a los ancianos locales que se debe denunciar a la Policía o Guardia Civil cualquier indicio de abusos de menores.

El pasado mes de diciembre, este colectivo escribió una carta abierta dirigida a la Junta Directiva Nacional de los Testigos de Jehová y a la Watch Tower Bible, en Brooklyn (Nueva York), la entidad legal que apoya la obra, en la que denuncian que las congregaciones ocultan abusos sexuales y exigen justicia.

"A las demandas en Estados Unidos seguirá en toda Europa nuestro compromiso y defensa de los derechos de los niños, en todas las instancias y medios de comunicación. Nada nos detendrá en nuestro compromiso personal para lograr, sin odio ni rencor, reparación y justicia para todas las víctimas de abusos de menores dentro del culto de la Watch Tower", rezaba la carta.

En concreto, denunciaban que cuando un miembro de los Testigos de Jehová es acusado de abusos sexuales, las congregaciones cuentan con tribunales "secretos" con normas internas que juzgan los casos y "silencian a las víctimas". Según precisan, "miles de niños" han sido víctimas.

http://www.lainformacion.com/politica/derechos-humanos/Exmiembros-Testigos-Jehova-denunciaran-entregarles_0_990801892.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 637
  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

Testigos de Jehová darán respuesta por escrito a la petición de documentos de exmiembros que denuncian abusos

Los Testigos de Jehová han asegurado que darán respuesta por escrito a la petición realizada por el colectivo AbusosTJ --que representa a exmiembros de esta confesión que denuncian casos de abusos sexuales en las congregaciones--, después de que este martes dicho colectivo se haya presentado en la sede de la entidad religiosa.
 

Dos de los miembros del colectivo AbusosTJ, Miguel García López e Israel Florez, han asegurado este lunes 16 de enero que, tras acudir a la sede nacional de los Testigos de Jehová en Ajalvir (Madrid) para recoger unos documentos "secretos" sobre casos de abusos que, según indican, habían solicitado previamente vía burofax, no se les han entregado.

Sin embargo, los Testigos de Jehová han asegurado que "no es de ningún modo cierto" que a su petición de los documentos se les haya dado una negativa por respuesta.

"Hoy, al presentarse aquí, en la sede nacional para pedir la entrega de unos documentos, se les ha dicho que recibirán respuesta por escrito", han explicado en declaraciones a Europa Press fuentes de los Testigos de Jehová en España.

Las mismas fuentes han precisado que lo que solicitó este colectivo en su día vía burofax no fue la entrega de estos documentos sino "que se cancelaran los datos personales que sobre ellos hubiese" en sus registros.

Sobre este reclamo, los Testigos de Jehová aseguran que eliminaron esta información personal y notificaron de ello al colectivo "porque así es preceptivo por ley".

Mientras, el colectivo ha anunciado que pondrá una denuncia contra la entidad religiosa por no haber recibido este lunes los documentos. "Si ellos deciden denunciar, como es obvio respecto a esta o a cualquier otra denuncia, su actuación ha de ajustarse a Derecho", han subrayado desde la sede de los Testigos de Jehová.

http://www.cuatro.com/noticias/sociedad/Testigos-Jehova-respuesta-documentos-exmiembros_0_2308950936.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  

  • Members

    • Miracle Pete

      Miracle Pete 1

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,410

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Anna

      Anna 5,083

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Techredirector
    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.