ALL aspects of 1914 doctrine are now problematic from a Scriptural point of view

[Ann O'Maly]

All I see is JW.org's unsubstantiated assertions that there is a second fullfillment. So please, highlight the relevant part that gives Scriptural basis.

[bruceq]

Just now, Ann O'Maly said:

All I see is JW.org's unsubstantiated assertions that there is a second fullfillment. So please, highlight the relevant part that gives Scriptural basis.

See above 

[bruceq]

BTW Ann o Maly do you celebrate Christmas?

[Ann O'Maly]

Blowing smoke then. You cannot make a robust defense, @bruceq. Perhaps someone else can help you. Anyone?

[bruceq]

Just now, Ann O'Maly said:

Blowing smoke then. You cannot make a robust defense, @bruceq. Perhaps someone else can help you. Anyone?

Since you cannot defend your position may I ask do you celebrate Christmas?

[Ann O'Maly]

Off topic. Don't change the subject.

[bruceq]

1 minute ago, Ann O'Maly said:

Blowing smoke then. You cannot make a robust defense, @bruceq. Perhaps someone else can help you. Anyone?

My defense is the Faithful Slave...yours is Christendom. Who is right Jehovah or Christendom?

[bruceq]

1 minute ago, Ann O'Maly said:

Off topic. Don't change the subject.

That is on topic since you believe in the teachings of Christendom do you celebrate Christmas? Not that hard to answer is it?

[Ann O'Maly]

Quote

My defense is the Faithful Slave...yours is Christendom. Who is right Jehovah or Christendom?

Good question. Who is right about the application and fulfillment of Dan. 4? God (through Daniel) or JW.org?

[bruceq]

2 minutes ago, Ann O'Maly said:

Good question. Who is right about the application and fulfillment of Dan. 4? God (through Daniel) or JW.org?

So who is right? Jehovah's Witnesses or Christendom?

[bruceq]

Since you believe in the chronology of Christendom then do you celebrate Christmas Ann ???

[Ann O'Maly]

About the interpretation of Dan. 4? Daniel, of course.