Jump to content
The World News Media

Transfusiones de sangre son una decisión personal: Testigos de Jehová


Guest Nicole

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Consideran a la sangre como la vida y con el fin de obedecer las leyes bíblicas deciden abstenerse de comer o transfundirse sangre.

16/07/2017 11:23 a.m.

0

ALBERTO CARDONA

Presencia.MX

Por respeto a las normas establecidas en la biblia, los testigos de Jehová no aceptan las transfusiones de sangre,  ya que de acuerdo a ellos, la sangre representa algo sagrado para Dios, sin embargo, a nadie obligan rechazarla, “todo queda en decisión de la persona, en el caso de los menores de edad es el padre quien decide si aceptar o no, dicho procedimiento médico”, explicó Abiud Galdámez Rodríguez, anciano de los Testigos de Jehová.

Galdámez Rodríguez dijo que ellos respetan la opinión de las personas y valoran mucho el trabajo que hacen los médicos, sólo que para los Testigos de Jehová, el respeto a la sangre se rige por normas, esperanza y principios basados en la biblia. 

“Es tener precaución, cuidado, la biblia maneja las normas que Dios estableció y entre algunas está la ley de la sangre; el hombre la puede cambiar, pero lo que viene de Dios no lo cambia ningún gobierno terrenal”, explicó.

Añadió que quien quiere obedecer y agradar a Dios, trata de no transgredir, “nuestra religión no obliga, cuando alguien entiende que Jehová es el dador de la vida y  percibe que no se pueden cambiar esas normas que Dios estableció, con plena facultad puede tomar una decisión al comprender que de hacerlo estaría desobedeciendo una norma elaborada por Dios”.

Dijo que no es temor porque Dios vaya a castigar, si no que se basa en el amor de no hacerlo sentir mal,  y es una decisión personal cuando alguien comprende y acepta no realizarse una transfusión de sangre.

Explicó que en el caso de  un menor de edad, hay quienes entienden y por tal razón saben tomar decisiones y muchas veces ellos no porque sus padres los obliguen sino porque ya maduraron espiritual y valoran su relación con Dios, toman su propia decisión.

Agregó que si se trata de un bebé, que no pueda valerse por sí solo, la ley terrenal otorga a los padres como responsables de hacer valer y que se respeten los derechos del niño ya que como no puede decidir por él mismo, el adulto representa su tutor.

“Existen leyes que el ser humano ha establecido donde le da el derecho a los padres decidir hasta cierta edad sobre el menor, ya  ante el gobierno hay un contrato con la organización de los Testigos de Jehová, donde tienen el conocimiento de respetar la decisión de uno en un hospital”, expuso.

Dijo que para los testigos de Jehová, la sangre es la vida del ser humano; “la transfusión a veces es necesaria, pero cuando se opera a las personas y necesitan de ésta, algunos han exigido sus derechos  y piden que no se le transfiera sangre;  para nosotros la sangre es la vida”.

La percepción que las personas tienen de los testigos de Jehová es que dejan morir a los familiares; sin embargo, asegura que cuando se presenta una situación, buscan todas las alternativas médicas, exceptuando las transfusiones de sangre, con el fin de curarse ya que consideran la vida como un regalo de Dios.

Agregó que hay Testigos de Jehová quienes no aceptan una transfusión no por el hecho de que sea obligación, sino porque así lo quieren, “no es que nos neguemos a ser realistas, sino a fundamentos con base; pero en el caso de los niños, si se fuera acude ante un juez este ya tiene conocimiento del derecho que tiene el niño, y de quien es el responsable hasta cierta edad, el  juez tiene que decidir”. Finalizó.

https://www.presencia.mx/nota.aspx?id=127109&s=3

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 1.4k
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.