Jump to content

Jack Ryan

Family of Jehovah's Witness who died after refusing blood transfusion can't keep suing doctors

Topic Summary


Last Reply



Jack Ryan -
JW Insider -

Top Posters

Recommended Posts

Screen Shot 2017-07-24 at 2.29.58 PM.png

The family of a Jehovah's Witness who died after repeatedly refusing blood transfusions can't sue the hospital where doctors begged for a chance to save her life, a state appeals court ruled.

The case, outlined in an opinion by Superior Court Judge Jacqueline O. Shogan, involves a convergence of religion, medicine and the law.

Its focus is on what happened before Terri Seels-Davila, a Jehovah's Witness missionary, died after giving birth at Hahnemann University Hospital in Philadelphia in November 2010.

Seels-Davila, who had been serving on mission with her husband in Nicaragua, chose Hahnemann because of its "bloodless medicine" program for patients who won't agree to having blood transfusions, including Jehovah's Witnesses, Shogan noted. The treatment plan for Seels-Davila called for recycling her own blood back into her system.

Yet that proved to be inadequate when complications of her delivery required Seels-Davila to deliver by cesarean section. She developed internal bleeding. Even though doctors warned that her condition was dire, Seels-Davila, her husband and other family members refused to consent to a transfusion, court filings state.

Those filings include testimony from a doctor who said Seels-Davila told him "she was a minister of the faith...and that she was OK with whatever happened." Seels-Davila died four days later.

Seels-Davila's family sued the hospital for medical malpractice in 2012. During a civil trial three years later, a Philadelphia County jury ruled in favor of the hospital and the doctors who treated her.

The family's failed appeal to the state court represented an attempt to revive the suit. Seels-Davila's relatives claimed, among other things, that the county judge wrongly prevented an expert witness from testifying against the bloodless medicine program and didn't allow them to press a claim for corporate negligence.

Shogan agreed that the expert witness wasn't qualified to testify in the case. The family's failure to provide a competent expert witness also undermined its corporate negligence claim, she found.

The state judge found as well that the county judge rightly allowed the jury to see the consent forms Seels-Davila signed in which she explicitly refused to consent to transfusions.

"The consent forms were not admitted merely to show that Seels-Davila understood the risks of treatment, yet elected to proceed," Shogan wrote. "The consents were admitted to prove that Seels-Davila knowingly refused treatments that would have saved her life."

    Hello guest!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jay Witness said:

"The consent forms were not admitted merely to show that Seels-Davila understood the risks of treatment, yet elected to proceed," Shogan wrote. "The consents were admitted to prove that Seels-Davila knowingly refused treatments that would have saved her life."

I know a lot of Witnesses who, deep down, believe that you can't really die from lack of a blood transfusion. Some Witnesses can't even bring themselves to admit that blood transfusions save thousands of lives every year. So there is this idea that doctors didn't do all they could, and that the doctors' representatives are only claiming that the patient died explicitly from the lack of a blood transfusion. Of course, there really is a lot of incompetence and malpractice and mismanagement and who knows what all the factors were in this case.

But it's sad situation made even sadder if the reason were primarily based on the family's misunderstanding of the risks.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Jack Ryan
      TV NEWS REPORT - WGAL News 8 - child sex abuse claims at the.mp4
      For context, this congregation is one over from the Red Lion Congregation. Both Congregations were mentioned in the Philadelphia Inquirer article. People go back and forth between the two like the wind. It's absurd that police weren't called on these levels of abuse going on. And that's just (2) incidents that are being covered in the local news.
    • By Bible Speaks
      The legal battles of Jehovah's Witnesses in western Pennsylvania laid the foundation for religious liberties
      In 1939, the tranquility of a Palm Sunday morning in Jeannette broke with the arrival of more than 100 people from outside the city.
      They parked their 25 cars outside the city limits and set up a makeshift headquarters at a local gas station with a pay phone, just in case there was a problem.
      The people, who called themselves Jehovah's Witnesses, descended on Jeanette from 9 a.m., as the residents prepared for Palm Sunday services, and knocked on doors. It was not long before the phone started ringing in the police office, according to the court record.
      Twelve of the 13 cases were in his favor, an unprecedented victory for the small and troubled sect, making that day 75 years ago a seminal one not only for Jehovah's Witnesses, but also for anyone who invokes the guarantee of religious freedom of the First Amendment, experts say.
      Jeannette's cases, especially those of Murdock, helped shape the body of law that continues to define the scope of free religious practice to this day, said Holly Hollman, general counsel of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.
      "In the development of the religious freedom law, Jehovah's Witnesses have had a disproportionate impact compared to their relatively small size," said Hollman. "These cases represent many propositions that are still important for religious freedom."
      Witnesses are credited with having won at least 30 major cases involving issues of religious freedom since 1938. Recently, in 2002, the Supreme Court, in Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of NY Inc. v. Village of Stratton (Ohio), reaffirmed 8-1 its finding in Murdock that allows requirements for religious scrutiny door to door violates the First Amendment.
      Peters, 79, of Delmont, said local Witness children who were expelled from public schools for not saluting the flag ended up going to an ad hoc United Kingdom School in the village of Gates in German Township, county Fayette
      Meanwhile, the adult Witnesses were despised by the communities for their alleged lack of patriotism and methods of evangelistic confrontation, including the use of record players and "wagons" that carry the message in the neighborhoods.
      "There were several who were arrested and imprisoned," Peters said. "Several of those who spoke told me that they used to take the toothbrush with them (to testify) because they knew that they would spend the night in jail."
      The outbreak of violence in the 1940s was "one of the worst episodes of religious persecution in the history of the United States," said Shawn Francis Peters (no relation), author of "Judging Jehovah's Witnesses: Religious Persecution and the revolution of rights. "
      "Religious minorities always face an uphill battle in this country, even though this country was founded on religious freedom," he said.
      Peters begins the book by recounting the disturbances of the Jehovah's Witnesses in Imperial, Allegheny County, in the summer of 1942. The incident, documented by the American Civil Liberties Union at that time, resulted in several Witnesses being beaten and their properties damaged. when they refused to salute the flag.
      Such incidents were repeated in dozens of communities as the country, preparing to enter World War II, feared a "fifth column" of homegrown Nazi sympathizers, he said. By the time the Supreme Court overturned his controversial Minersville decision in 1943, the violence had diminished.
      "(Murdock) has a modern viability, it's not just a relic of history," said lawyer Paul Polidoro of Atalaya Legal. "The Supreme Court made it clear in 2002 that it still controls the law."
      Hollman said that in the 1930s, Jehovah's Witnesses developed an assertive legal strategy to match their assertive evangelistic practices, practices that were often misunderstood and challenged, even attacked.
      "He is more likely to have a clash with government policy if his practice is not familiar," he said. "The clashes between people who practice their religion and the government more often come from religious minorities."
      Those confrontations became violent in 1940, when Jehovah's Witnesses were attacked for refusing to pronounce the oath of allegiance or to salute the American flag. Strengthened by the case of the Supreme Court Minersville v. Gobitis, which confirmed the flag greeting requirement of the Schuylkill County School District, communities resorted to violence against Witnesses and their Kingdom Halls.
      "There is no doubt that between the 1930s and the 1940s, there were people who tried to make it appear that our ministry was criminal, illegal, even subversive," said Don Peters, an elder from the Greensburg Kingdom Hall.
      In all, 21 Witnesses were arrested for violating a city ordinance of 40 years that requires applicants to obtain a permit before going door to door. Among them was a man named Robert L. Douglas.
      Faced with a fine of up to $ 100 or a jail sentence of up to 30 days, Douglas appealed his conviction, arguing that the city's permit requirement was an unconstitutional violation of his First Amendment rights. In 1943, the appeal had reached the Supreme Court under the name of Douglas v. City of Jeannette.
      The wave of arrests on Palm Sunday did not deter the Witnesses from returning to Jeannette the following year. Encouraged by years of hostility from local authorities and the general public, Jehovah's Witnesses were nothing if not tenacious in their approach to evangelization. This time, eight people, including Robert Murdock Jr., were arrested.
      Your legal challenge, entitled Murdock v. Pennsylvania, reached the Supreme Court at the same time as the Douglas case of the previous year. In May, the judges issued four decisions, consolidating 13 cases related to the rights of Jehovah's Witnesses to proselytize and disseminate literature.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in (it's free) to view the hidden content.
    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      Along with Bible teachings and online lessons on how to lead a good life and find peace and happiness, the Jehovah Witnesses website at JW.org also offers serious insight and words of caution to parents about sexual child abuse.
      And, that makes the recent Philadelphia Inquirer story alleging that Jehovah's Witness elders have repeatedly covered up sexual abuse of members' children, shunned members and victims who raised complaints of child abuse and have impeded police investigations into abuse allegations even more shocking.
      Among the victims of the Witnesses' shunning and stonewalling tactics interviewed by Inquirer reporter David Gambacorta were:
      The parents of a 4-year-old New Cumberland girl who was molested at the Jehovah Witness Kingdom Hall in Red Lion A Spring Grove woman who was molested when she was a teen by a Witness who was a family friend A York woman who was molested in her teens by a couple she knew through the Jehovah's Witnesses. Three defendants identified in the Inquirer investigative piece were prosecuted and sentenced in York County. A fourth is awaiting prosecution.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in (it's free) to view the hidden content.
    • By The Librarian
      Can you find more photos or videos related to this particular convention year?
      or even better... were you there? 
    • By admin
    • By The Librarian
      On Friday three Franciscan friars charged with allowing a suspected sexual predator to hold jobs where he molested more than 100 children, surrendered in Pennsylvania. They were confronted by the mother of one of his victims who said to them her 26 year old son committed suicide because of their 'bad decision making.' 69 year old Robert D'Aversa, 62 year old Anthony Criscitelli, and 73 year old Giles Schinelli, are free on unsecured bond until an April 14 preliminary hearing on child endangerment and conspiracy charges. Each charge is a third-degree felony carrying up to seven years in prison.
    • By admin
      WILKINSBURG, Pa. -- Two gunmen working as a team fatally shot five people including a pregnant woman and critically wounded two others at a backyard cookout, with one attacker using a rifle to shoot the victims in the head as they were driven in his direction, a prosecutor said Thursday.
      "The murders were planned. They were calculated, brutal," District Attorney Stephen Zappala said of the Wednesday nighttime shootings.
      The medical examiner officially ruled the death of the fetus a homicide Thursday afternoon, bringing the official count of fatalities in the late Wednesday night ambush attack to six.
      The gunmen appeared to have targeted one or two of the victims, said Zappala, who added that they hadn't ruled out drugs as a motive.
      Four women, one of them eight months' pregnant, and a man were killed as they rushed toward the back porch to seek cover as a gunman fired a .40-caliber pistol at as many as 15 adults who were playing cards and having a late-night cookout.
      That steered the victims toward the rear porch and door of the house, where an accomplice armed with a 7.62 mm rifle similar to an AK-47 shot them from behind a chain-link fence less than 10 feet from the porch, Zappala said.
      Neither weapon has been found.
      The man with the rifle aimed high throughout the barrage of bullets. Four of the dead were found on the tiny back porch.
      "They were all head shots," Zappala said.
      The dead included three siblings, Brittany Powell, 27, who lived at the home; Jerry Shelton, 35; and Chanetta Powell, 25. The other two were Shada Mahone, 26, and Tina Shelton, 37.
      "My whole family was massacred," said Jessica Shelton, the mother of the siblings and aunt of the other two killed.
      "It doesn't make sense to take people's lives like that," said Jessica Shelton, who had been at the party earlier in the evening.
      Her daughter Chanetta was eight months' pregnant, she said. And she said one of the critically wounded victims is also her son.
      One of her grandchildren was at the party and saw his mother lying dead, then ran upstairs, Shelton said.
      "He said he didn't want the bad men to get him," she said.
      She said she didn't know why anyone at the party would have been targeted.
      All of the victims were hit by shots from the rifle, and none from gunfire from the pistol, which "looked like a distraction almost," said agent Chris Taylor, of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. He said 49 shots were fired in total, 31 from the rifle.
      All of the victims had multiple wounds.
      "It looks like right now they were all fleeing toward the back door of the residence when the second gunman fired from the side of the yard," said Lt. Andrew Schurman of the Allegheny County homicide unit. "They all seemed to get caught on the back porch."
      Carl Morris and his son, Robert, were getting ready to leave their house across the street when they heard a volley of three shots, a pause, then gunfire lasting more than a minute.
      Robert Morris said he saw children run onto the small back porch and heard someone scream, "Mommy, Mommy!"
      "It was terrible," the younger Morris said.
      The Morrises said Brittany Powell lived at the home with a daughter who was about 6 or 7. They said the house was considered a "safe haven" in the neighborhood.
      The backyard is about 30 feet by 50 feet. Police said they found one pile of shell casings just outside the yard in an alley, where they believe the .40-caliber pistol was fired, Zappala said. They found more shells along a fence that separates the house from a neighbor's yard, which is where Zappala said the rifle was fired.
      Bullet holes were visible Thursday around the porch addition. Tables and chairs, some tipped over, remained in the backyard, signs of a party quickly abandoned.
      The gunmen fled on foot.
      Allegheny County Police Superintendent Charles Moffatt said at a press conference Thursday afternoon that there are no firm suspects, but investigators are pursuing several leads, reports CBS Pittsburgh.
      The station reports that a $20,000 reward is being offered for information that leads to an arrest.
      Wilkinsburg is a poorer, largely blighted suburb just east of Pittsburgh that is known for drug trafficking and gun violence. But neighbors described the street on which the shooting occurred as generally quiet.
      After the shooting, groups of residents gathered on the street, some of them sobbing and saying they lost family members.
      Mike Jones, 57, has lived in a duplex on a small hill overlooking the alley and backyard where the shooting occurred.
      Although Wilkinsburg has a reputation for violence, Jones said it has been rare in his neighborhood, which is about a block off a major street about a half-mile from Interstate 376, the major commuter artery through Pittsburgh's eastern suburbs.
      "This is unheard of," Jones said, shaking his head as homicide detectives milled about in the yard and alley. "It doesn't happen around here."
      Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald urged witnesses to step forward, saying that "can be our first step to stopping the violence in our communities."
      "As a community, we must say enough is enough," he said.
      CBS/AP http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gunmen-1-with-rifle-worked-as-team-to-kill-6-at-pittsburgh-pennsylvania-cookout/
    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      By David DeKok
      HARRISBURG, Pa. (Reuters) - Hundreds of children in western Pennsylvania were sexually assaulted by about 50 Roman Catholic priests over four decades while bishops covered up their actions, according to a state grand jury report released on Tuesday.
      The report found that former Altoona-Johnstown Diocese Bishop James Hogan, who died in 2005, and his successor, Joseph Adamec, who retired in 2011, worked to cover pedophile priests' tracks and that some local law enforcement agencies also avoided investigating abuse allegations, said state Attorney General Kathleen Kane.
      "The heinous crimes these children endured are absolutely unconscionable," Kane told reporters in unveiling the report, based on a two-year investigation. "These predators desecrated a sacred trust and preyed upon their victims in the very places where they should have felt most safe."
      Revelations that some priests had habitually sexually abused children and that bishops had systematically covered up those crimes burst onto the world stage in 2002 when the Boston Globe reported widespread abuse in the Boston Archdiocese.
      That report, which won a Pulitzer Prize and was the subject of last year's Academy Award-winning film "Spotlight," set off a global wave of investigations that found similar patterns at dioceses around the world. They led to hefty lawsuits and seriously undermined the church's moral authority.
      No criminal charges will be filed because the alleged incidents are too old to be prosecuted, Kane said.
      Advocates for victims of sex assault have long urged lawmakers to give prosecutors more time to bring charges of sex assaults of minors, noting that particularly in the case of assaults by members of the clergy, victims can take years to come forward.
      The report contains explicit details of scores of attacks, naming perpetrators, many of whom have since died. Many of the surviving priests were still serving parishes at the time the investigation began, Kane said, but all have since been removed by the current bishop.
      "This is a painful and difficult time," current Altoona-Johnstown Bishop Mark Bartchak said in a statement. "I deeply regret any harm that has come to children.
      "We're saddened but not the least bit surprised," said David Clohessy, director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. "It proves what we've long maintained: that even now, under the guise of 'reform,' bishops continue to deceive parishioners and the public about their ongoing efforts to hide abuse."
      Adamec, the retired bishop, did not respond to a request for comment.
      Source: http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0W35NI?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews
  • Forum Statistics

    Total Topics
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    Total Members
    Most Online
    Patricia deaton
    Newest Member
    Patricia deaton

  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.