Jump to content
The World News Media

Employee dishes on Boring Company insider details, LA tunnel future


Guest

Recommended Posts

  • Guest

A former employee of Elon Musk’s The Boring Company has started an Ask Me Anything thread on Reddit under the username “Gizmo,” and some juicy details have emerged.

The user’s account has been verified by Reddit moderators, so we know that Gizmo is speaking from a place of authority.

There aren’t many public details about the company aside from it being primarily run by interns and only taking up 2-3% of Musk’s time, so Redditors jumped at the chance to learn more.

One user asked about the plan for when the company’s tunnel reaches the end of the SpaceX parking lot, to which Gizmo replied:

“Hope really hard that LA lets us continue.
No, really. The permitting is a huge nightmare and there wasn’t a solid plan when I left. So it all depends on where the tunnel goes and if all the appropriate easements/landowners/laws can be satisfied.”

The tunnel has been lauded by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, but there are still many regulatory hurdles to overcome, as Gizmo pointed out.

Another user asked about the company’s biggest risks.

“Ooh. Well there’s a lot of them. In no particular order
Buy-in from cities/[landowners]
Permitting (oh god the permitting)
Public acceptance (a big concern I’ve heard is “where are the windows?”)
NIMBY (not in my backyard) folks
Time required (right now we still can’t even move at the speed of a snail)
Honestly, the technical details are not a huge risk. Elon’s already discussed why earthquakes aren’t a big issue, and tunneling isn’t exactly new – we’re just looking to apply new technologies to an old industry.”

My favorite username of the bunch, Donttouchmyficus, asked how Gizmo was first hired by the company.

“I was actually recruited through my college. One of my good friends (currently an associate engineer working on MVac) had an internship as a junior. SpaceX tends to keep in contact with their interns and so he was essentially our campus recruiter.
Maybe February or March he forwarded me an email to apply for Boring Company jobs, they were hiring just a few people. The week of my graduation (first week of May) I actually got a call from Steve Davis who’s in charge of the whole project, and 4 days later I was in LA.
As for who they’re looking for, I would say it’s definitely younger or more motivated people. They love students that are involved in clubs like Formula SAE or have done research, rather than just completing courses and doing honors work. We’re working out of the SpaceX headquarters and the culture is therefore much the same as you might hear about them.”

A fourth user inquired about the production side of the business, which shed some light on The Boring Company-SpaceX relationship, since Boring operates outside of SpaceX’s HQ.

“We’re using the SpaceX facilities heavily. The Tooling department hates us. They’re incredibly competent though – some of the best welds I’ve ever seen were on the elevator frame. Very few dedicated tools, but there’s plenty to borrow usually.”

Gizmo adds, “The tunneling aspect is only part of the project. There’s a lot more involved in tunneling than just the actually tunnel – the support infrastructure (this includes the elevator) is very important.”

The final question that caught my eye was about the safety and effectiveness of The Boring Company’s elevator and if “perfect alignment” was needed to ensure no damage to the vehicles using it.

“There were a number of solutions discussed for the issue of alignment etc. I believe one solution has been to only allow Teslas which will integrate with the elevator and therefore align themselves through AP. [Besides] that, there will definitely be additional safeguards added, particularly in terms of occupant and pedestrian safety.”

With interesting insider details and a potentially ground-breaking impact, the only growing concern surrounds the Hyperloop permit process. If acquiring permits is as nightmarish as Gizmo points out, it could be a long time before Americans see any kind of Hyperloop tunnel.

Source 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 295
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

    • misette

      misette 213

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,411

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.