Jump to content
The World News Media

Testigo de Jehová, a la Corte por transfusión de sangre

Guest Nicole

By Guest Nicole
in Tema

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Nicole

Guest Nicole

Posted
  • Guest
Posted

Eduvigis Fariña, quien profesa la religión de los Testigos de Jehová, una rama del cristianismo que no permite la transfusión de sangre, presentó una acción de inconstitucionalidad ante la Sala Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia (CSJ), pidiendo que se declare inconstitucional la sentencia del Tribunal de Apelación en lo Civil y Comercial de Central, que confirmó que su esposa, Linia Ayala González, sea sometida a una transfusión de sangre a pesar de profesar esta religión. Ayala falleció el 12 de octubre pasado. El escrito está firmado por la abogada Abigail Irene Alonso Ortega.

Meses atrás, el Hospital de Clínicas de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción (UNA) presentó un amparo judicial para poder realizarle la transfusión de sangre a Ayala, quien ingresó con un cuadro grave de salud. La mujer, al enterarse de que sería sometida a dicho tratamiento, se negó, por lo que los médicos recurrieron a la justicia, obteniendo una decisión favorable.

La acción presentada por Fariña deberá ser analizada por los miembros de la Sala Constitucional de la CSJ, Antonio Fretes, Gladys Bareiro de Módica y Miryam Peña, quienes deberán estudiar si corresponde admitir o rechazar la misma. "Estamos ante una situación flagrante de violación de los derechos humanos al pretenderse dejar de lado y violentar la voluntad fehacientemente secundada del paciente, quien verbalmente y por escrito eligió no someterse al tratamiento con sangre", sostienen los accionantes.

También alegan discriminación por la violación del principio constitucional de igualdad ante la ley, consagrado en el artículo 46 de la Constitución Nacional, puesto que se les negó ejercer la libertad de culto. Con base en los argumentos expuestos, se pide hacer lugar a la acción declarando inconstitucional la sentencia en la que se ordenó la transfusión de sangre.

De hacerse lugar a la acción, dejaría un precedente para futuros casos. De esta manera, las personas que profesan la religión Testigos de Jehová se podrán negar a realizar la transfusión de sangre a pesar de que su vida dependa de ella.

http://www.lanacion.com.py/judiciales/2017/11/19/testigo-de-jehova-a-la-corte-por-transfusion-de-sangre/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 955
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pudgy
      A Proclamation on Transgender Day of Visibility, 2024

      By Pudgy · Posted

      … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • Mic Drop
      The Ethereum Cryptocurrency Scam

      By Mic Drop · Posted

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  

  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,411

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • mabbub

      mabbub 4

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TrueTomHarley

      TrueTomHarley 9,548

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Techredirector
    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.