Jump to content
The World News Media

Barber's Logic - God does not exist....

Queen Esther

By Queen Esther
in Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Member
Queen Esther Newbie

Queen Esther

Posted
  • Member
Posted

Barber's Logic - God does not exist :)

A Barber's Story:  Does God Exist ?

A man went to a barber shop to have his hair and his beard cut as always. He started to have a good conversation with the barber who attended him. They talked about so many things and various subjects. Suddenly, they touched the subject of God. The barber said: "Look man, I don't believe that God exists as you say."

"Why do you say that?" asked the client.

"Well, it's so easy, you just have to go out in the street to realize that God does not exist. Oh, tell me, if God existed, would there be so many sick people? Would there be abandoned children? If God existed, there would be no suffering nor pain. I can't think of loving a God who permits all of these things."

The client stopped for a moment thinking, but he didn't want to respond as to cause an argument. The barber finished his job and the client went out of the shop. Just after he left the barber shop he saw a man in the street with a long hair and beard (it seems that it had been a long time since he had his cut and he looked so untidy).

Then the client again entered the barber shop and he said to the barber, "You know what? Barbers do not exist."

"How can you say they don't exist?" asked the barber. "Well I am here and I am a barber."

"No!" the client exclaimed. "They don't exist because if they did there would be no people with long hair and a beard like that man who walks in the street."

"Ah, barbers do exist, what happens is that people do not come to me."

"Exactly!"-  affirmed the client.  "That's the point.  God does exist,  what happens is, people don't go to Him and do not look for Him.  That's why there's so much pain and suffering in the world."

Amen :x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 1.2k
  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Queen Esther

Barber's Logic - God does not exist A Barber's Story:  Does God Exist ? A man went to a barber shop to have his hair and his beard cut as always. He started to have a good conversation with

Queen Esther

I  study  later.....  Now  I  go  resting !!    See  us

Queen Esther

THANK  YOU   my  dear  Brother @Alzasior Lutor  for  like  my  post Also  my  dear  loyal  Sister  @Blanchie DeGrate  I  love  your  both  honest  likes ?

Posted Images

  • Member
James Thomas Rook Jr. Rookie

James Thomas Rook Jr.

Posted
  • Member
Posted
2 minutes ago, Queen Esther said:

Its  MORE  harder  to  find  the  right  people  for  the  TRUTH !

That is very true ... my wife and I calculated that with the 77% dropout rate, it takes 25 MAN-YEARS to bring a new person into the Truth who will stay his whole life. ( That's 2,000 hours x 25 years of work ). It is quicker and more efficient to have children, and properly raise them in the Truth, which takes about 1/5 the effort and approximately six less years).  PLUS, if you have THREE children, your effectiveness is multiplied by three.

For many months we have been taking classes to adopt children, and getting our house ready ... and expect to be licensed by the end of December. and adopt a sibling group. ( That means brothers and sisters, for those in Rio Linda...).

Depending on their ages, in about 12 to 18 years, I will let you know how it turned out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Member
Queen Esther Newbie

Queen Esther

Posted
  • Author
  • Member
Posted

I  also  like  it,  calculate  this  or  that...  but  its  not  good  - and  we  learn,  not  do  that  with  Bible-scriptures !  The  result  will  be  never  exact !   ITS  SIMILAR  TO  THE  YEAR  1975 !!   REMEMBER,  any  anointed  Brother  made  a  big  mistake,  telling  a  special  count.  Later,  many  Brother's  after  a  time,  quitted  the  Truth :(  That  was  a  fatal  mistake....  Better  not  repeat  that.  Jehovah  will  tell  us  all  to  the  right  time !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pudgy
      A Proclamation on Transgender Day of Visibility, 2024

      By Pudgy · Posted

      … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • Mic Drop
      The Ethereum Cryptocurrency Scam

      By Mic Drop · Posted

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  

  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,411

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Col310
    Newest Member
    Col310
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.