Jump to content
The World News Media

Continúa el incendio del petrolero iraní que colisionó con un buque en el Mar de China: temen un desastre ambiental


Raquel Segovia

Recommended Posts

  • Member

El buque restaba navegando desde Irán hacia Corea del Sur con un cargamento de 136.000 toneladas de condensados de crudo ultraliviano, que podría causar al medio ambiente daños potencialmente peores que el crudo pesado. El accidente dejó además 32 desaparecidos

 

Un barco petrolero que colisionó con un buque de carga en el Mar de China el sábado continuaba en llamas en la mañana del lunes, de acuerdo a un funcionario de la guardia costera de Corea del Sur, mientras los equipos de emergencia seguían tratando de dar con la tripulación que por el momento está desaparecida.

Las autoridades chinas dijeron además que el buque podría explotar y hundirse, causando un desastre ambiental.

El buque Sanchi, gestionado por el principal operador de barcos petroleros de Irán, chocó con el CF Crystal a unas 160 millas náuticas de la costa de Shanghái en la noche del sábado.

La estatal china CCTV mostró imágenes del tanquero incendiándose bajo una columna de humo negro. China envió cuatro barcos de rescate y tres de limpieza hacia el lugar del accidente. Corea del Sur también envió embarcaciones de ayuda.

 
 
(CCTV via REUTERS)
(CCTV via REUTERS)

La armada de Estados Unidos envió una aeronave militar para colaborar con la búsqueda, dijo el lunes China Daily.

Por el momento no se sabía si alguno de los 32 miembros de la tripulación había sido rescatado, dijo un funcionario de la guardia costera, que declinó dar su nombre ya que no estaba autorizado a hablar con la prensa.

El buque registrado en Panamá estaba navegando desde Irán hacia Corea del Sur con un cargamento de 136.000 toneladas de condensados de crudo ultraliviano. La cifra es equivalente a poco menos de 1 millón de barriles, valorados en cerca de 60 millones de dólares, de acuerdo a los precios globales del crudo.

Los expertos consideran que el crudo ultraliviano podría causar al medio ambiente daños potencialmente peores que el crudo pesado. 

 
(CCTV via REUTERS)
(CCTV via REUTERS)

"Es más probable que evapore o se mezcle con el agua", dijo John Driscoll de la firma JTD Energy Services a BBC. "También puede no tener color ni olor, lo cual hace que sea más difícil detectarlo, contenerlo y limpiarlo".

Hanwha Total Petrochemical Co Ltd en Corea del Sur tenía previsto recibir la carga, La firma estaba viendo alternativas para reemplazar los barriles que no recibió, de acuerdo a un portavoz.

La firma podría usar sus propios inventarios, pedir a Irán otra carga o buscar suministros alternativos de condensados desde Qatar.

(Con información de Reuters)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 262
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  
    • In the era of the Bible Students within the Watchtower, there were numerous beginnings. It is essential to bear in mind that each congregation functioned autonomously, granting the Elders the freedom to assert their own assertions and interpretations. Most people embraced the principles that Pastor Russell was trying to convey. You could argue that what you are experiencing now, they also experienced back then. The key difference is that unity was interpreted differently. Back then it had value where today there is none. To address your inquiry, while I cannot recall the exact details, it is believed to have been either 4129 or 4126. Some groups, however, adopted Ussher's 4004. It is worth mentioning that they have now discarded it and revised it to either 3954 or 3958, although I personally find little interest in this matter. I believe I encountered this information in the book titled "The Time is at Hand," though it may also be referenced in their convention report. Regardless, this is part of their compelling study series 3. Please take a moment to review and confirm the date. I am currently focused on Riblah. The Bible Students who firmly believe that Israel is the prophetic sign of Armageddon have made noteworthy adjustments to their chronology. They have included significant dates such as 1947/8 and 1967/8, as well as more recent dates. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that, according to their calculations, 2024 holds immense importance. The ongoing tension of Iran targeting Israel directly from its own territory amplifies the gravity of the situation. If their trajectory continues, the subsequent captivating event will occur in 2029, rather than as previously speculated, in 2034 by some.
    • Would it be too much to ask what was the bible students starting point of creation?
    • @JW Insider Your summary is irrelevant, as I do not make any assertions regarding BC/AD other than their usage by scholars and in history, as you yourself have also acknowledged on numerous occasions, thus rendering your point invalid and evasive. The Watchtower leverages external viewpoints, including secular evidence, to substantiate the accuracy of their chronological interpretations. There are numerous approaches to dating events. Personally, I explore various alternative methods that lead to the same conclusion as the Watchtower. However, the most captivating approach is to utilize secular chronology to arrive at the same outcome. By relying solely on secular chronology, the pattern still aligns, albeit with a distinct interpretation of the available data. Nevertheless, the ultimate result remains unchanged. This is why when you get upset, when you are proven wrong, you, Tom, and those with the authority to ban take action, because you like others cannot handle the truth. In this case, your infamous tablet VAT 4956 has become useless in this situation. I do agree with you on one thing: you are not an expert, just like COJ. However, I must admit that this foolish individual was not the first to debate the chronology with the Watchtower and abandon it based on personal beliefs. He simply happened to be the most recent one that's on record.
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.