Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Guest Nicole

Corte Constitucional falló a favor de una Iglesia de testigos de Jehová en Armenia

Topic Summary

Created

Last Reply

Replies

Views

Guest Nicole -
Guest Nicole -
1
394

Top Posters

  • Guest 1

Recommended Posts

Guest Nicole

La Sala Sexta de Revisión de Tutelas de la Corte Constitucional, integrada por los magistrados José Fernando Reyes Cuartas, Cristina Pardo Schlesinger y Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, encontró razón en los argumentos expuestos por la Iglesia Cristiana de los Testigos de Jehová en Armenia contra la Corporación Autónoma Regional del Quindío (CRQ), la cual pretendía hacer el cobro de la tasa.

 

 

Este caso inició en febrero del 2017, cuando la iglesia hizo una solicitud formal a la Alcaldía de Armenia para exonerar un predio de su propiedad, en donde realizaban sus actividades espirituales, del pago de impuestos.

La administración municipal aceptó la petición en lo que tiene que ver con el impuesto predial, sin embargo, mantuvo el cobro del impuesto ambiental.

Por esta razón, estos testigos de jehová decidieron instaurar una tutela alegando una presunta violación del derecho de la igualdad y libertad de cultos. En primera instancia, el Juzgado Segundo de Ejecución de Penas de Armenia consideró que no había discriminación, porque con excepción de la iglesia católica ninguna otra había sido exonerada del impuesto ambiental.

La iglesia continuó con el proceso mediante un recurso de impugnación que presentó en la Sala de Decisión Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito de Armenia, el cual tumbó la decisión del juzgado”Consideró evidente la violación del derecho a la igualdad de la accionante, en la medida en que a esta no se le ha aplicado la exoneración de la sobretasa ambiental con el mismo rasero que se aplica a la iglesia católica, situación que involucra un tratamiento desigual e injustificado”, explicó la Sala al exponer su fallo.

Esta decisión fue ratificada por la Corte Constitucional, por lo que en adelante el pago de dicho impuesto no deberá ser cobrado a ninguna organización que funcione como una iglesia en Colombia.

El alto tribunal además exhortó al Gobierno Nacional, por medio del Ministerio de Hacienda, y al Congreso de la República, a través de la Comisión Tercera Constitucional de la Cámara de Representantes, para que elaboren un proyecto de ley en el que se establezcan las disposiciones legales que regulen el cobro de la sobretasa ambiental a las iglesias y confesiones religiosas, en virtud de lo ordenado en la Constitución y la Ley 133 de 1994.

http://quindionoticias.com/locales/corte-constitucional-fallo-a-favor-de-una-iglesia-de-testigos-de-jehova-en-armenia/

TESTIGOS-DE-JEHOVA-e1529005326113.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      La Corte Constitucional falló a favor de una Iglesia Cristiana su petición de ser excluida del pago de impuesto ambiental.
      Este caso inició en febrero del 2017, cuando la iglesia hizo una solicitud formal a la Alcaldía de Armenia para exonerar un predio de su propiedad, en donde realizaban sus actividades espirituales, del pago de impuestos. 
      La administración municipal aceptó la petición en lo que tiene que ver con el impuesto predial, sin embargo, mantuvo el cobro del impuesto ambiental. 
      Por esta razón, estos testigos de jehová decidieron instaurar una tutela alegando una presunta violación del derecho de la igualdad y libertad de cultos. En la primera instancia, el Juzgado Segundo de Ejecución de Penas de Armenia consideró que no había discriminación porque con excepción de la iglesia católica ninguna otra había sido exonerada del impuesto ambiental. 
      La iglesia continuó con el proceso mediante un recurso de impugnación que presentó en la Sala de Decisión Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito de Armenia, el cual tumbó la decisión del juzgado. 
      http://www.wradio.com.co/noticias/actualidad/la-corte-constitucional-extendio-privilegios-tributarios-del-catolicismo-a-otras-iglesias/20180613/nota/3761660.aspx
    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      l fallar una tutela la Sección Quinta del Consejo de Estado advirtió que las autoridades encargadas de decidir si los templos religiosos deben o no estar exentos del pago de la sobretasa ambiental, son las autoridades municipales.
      Este pronunciamiento lo hizo el alto tribunal al estudiar una acción judicial presentada por la Congregación de los Testigos de Jehová, en la que solicitaban a la Corporación Autónoma Regional de las Cuencas de los Ríos Negro y Nare, la excepción del pago de la sobretasa ambiental.
      Señaló la Corporación Judicial que la CAR, no es la entidad para decidir sobre esos asuntos de carácter tributarios, pues “son los municipios quienes deben decidir si las iglesias deben o no pagar la sobretasa ambiental teniendo en cuenta que esa está incluida en el impuesto predial y el porcentaje que se destina para éste es determinado por los respectivos concejos municipales”.
      Para ello, explicó que mientras el Congreso de la República no regule la exención de pago de impuestos por parte de los centros religiosos, son los municipios de acuerdo a sus competencias, los que tienen a su cargo “el pronunciamiento frente a la exención tributaria”, al recordar que “la sobretasa ambiental es liquidada y recaudada por los municipios y tiene como finalidad la protección del medio ambiente y de los recursos naturales renovables”.
      https://canal1.com.co/noticias/justicia/municipios-quienes-deben-decidir-iglesias-deben-no-pagar-sobretasa-ambiental/
    • By Bible Speaks
      Armenia lost the case before the representatives of Jehovah's Witnesses at the ECHR *
       
      EREVÁN, March 7, 2018, 00:42 - REGNUM Armenia lost the next case before the European Court of Human Rights. This time, the case concerns four representatives of the religious organization "Jehovah's Witnesses" (an organization whose activities are prohibited in the Russian Federation). The ECHR found that Armenia violated the ninth article of the European Convention (violation of freedom of thought and religion) in its respect. According to the verdict of the court, the Armenian authorities are obliged to pay the claimants, in three months, 48,000 euros (12,000 each). Russian Su-57 attacked American militants and instructors
      Bold: Ukraine is hitting Russia unexpectedly
      The United States experienced a new weapon of mass destruction in the Black Sea
      MEMBER NEWS
      Four plaintiffs in 2011 were prosecuted for refusing to submit to compulsory military or alternative service.
      On July 17, 2017, the judicial board of the Supreme Court of Russia decided to reject the organization's appeal against the resolution on its liquidation. On April 20, the Supreme Court of Russia recognized the Jehovah's Witnesses as an extremist organization and liquidated it. Their activities are prohibited in the territory of the country.
      Syria in a stream of lies: about fighters in the United States, killed by blows Su-57
      Arab media: Shoigu avenged the "PWC Wagner"
      MEMBER NEWS
      Recognize that the organization "Jehovah's Witnesses" forbade and confiscated all their properties for the extremism that previously required the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. The lawsuit agency noted that "Jehovah's Witnesses" (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation) are promoting the idea of their exclusivity and superiority over other religions, which represents a threat to public order.
      In addition, the organization repeatedly ran into violations of the law and did not take any action to eliminate them. - https://regnum.ru/news/2387940.html


    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      Rima Grigoryan (Armine Avetisyan/OC Media)
      Armenian identity is so tightly interwoven with religion that it can often be heard that the only true Armenian is a follower of the Armenian Church. Contempt, discrimination, and outright hatred towards religious minorities have led to a worryingly widespread perception of them as outsiders — a threat to Armenian statehood.
      Deadly discrimination
      Anna (not her real name), 45, comes from Gyumri. She used to work as an Armenian language teacher in a local school, but was forced to leave after the school authorities discovered that she was a Pentecostal Christian.
      ‘I would never have thought that simply attending meetings of my religious organisation in my free time could be a reason for being fired from work. I was a teacher for ten years and my colleagues described me as a loved and respected professional. One day, I was invited to the principal’s office where he asked me to hand in my notice, because many parents had complained that a “sectarian” was teaching their children’, Anna told OC Media.
      Anna recalls that she initially tried to fight for her rights, but eventually got frustrated and left the school voluntarily four years ago.
      ‘I left voluntarily, hoping I would find another job. The whole year turned out to be full of suffering. All the schools I approached slammed their doors in my face, because I was considered a “heretic”. If not for my brothers and sisters in faith, I would have starved to death’, Anna said.

      Anna (Armine Avetisyan/OC Media)
      Despite always being able to count on moral support from her religious community, one day she attempted to end her life, tired of the almost universal scorn.
      ‘I drank bleach in order to die, but Jesus saved me — thank the Lord. I am grateful to him that I now have my little shop, which makes me feel human again’, Anna said.
      Anna is now earning her daily bread with trade, selling fresh produce.
      ‘I’m happy I’m able to help people in need. Each morning I distribute fresh and healthy produce to people in need. We must all cleanse our souls and share what we have with our neighbours’, Anna said.
      Although there are no official statistics to back it up, there is anecdotal evidence that Anna’s suicide attempt because of religious discrimination is far from unique in Armenia.
      Religious mosaic

       
      (Armine Avetisyan/OC Media)
      According to official data, there are 66 registered organisations carrying out religious activities in Armenia.
      According to the 2011 census, the Armenian Apostolic Church is the biggest religious domination in the country, followed by 93% of its 3 million inhabitants. Other Christian denominations make up 2.1% of the population, including Catholics, Evangelicals, Pentecostals and Jehovah’s Witnesses.
      The government considers these to be official religious organisations, although there are also several groups that only have the status of NGO, such as the Maharishi Transcendental Meditation Community or the Unification Church. Unregistered communities include Buddhists and the Hare Krishna community.
      The Armenian Constitution guarantees freedom of conscience and religious belief to every citizen. In theory, the rights of religious minorities are protected, yet in practice, the picture is rather different.
      The US State Department pointed out in their 2015 International Religious Freedom Report that religious minorities in Armenia are often subjected to various forms of abuse — obstacles in obtaining building permits for places of worship, and discrimination in education, the military, law enforcement, and public sector employment.
      The report also points out preferential government support for the Armenian Apostolic Church and negative media reports often referring to religious minorities in a derogatory manner as ‘cults’ or even as ‘enemies of the state’. It also pointed to instances of verbal and physical harassment of Jehovah’s Witnesses while proselytising.
      A family torn apart by religious intolerance

      Kristine (Armine Avetisyan/OC Media)
      ‘My family happiness lasted for only two years’, Kristine (not her real name), 35, recalls with sadness. She is currently taking care of her 5-year-old son alone.
      Kristine comes from the city of Vanadzor, in northern Armenia’s Lori Province. Six years ago she got married and moved with her husband to Yerevan. The first months were happy for the newlyweds, especially when they found out that they were to become parents.
      ‘When my child fell ill, I suffered a lot. At the hospital I met Jehovah’s Witnesses, who provided me with a lot of moral support. Over time, I began to read their books and I realised that I was living my life incorrectly, and that I needed different religious nourishment’, Kristine told OC Media.
      After she decided to join the Jehovah’s Witnesses, her life changed.
      When Kristine’s in-laws found out that she had embraced a new faith, they first tried to convince her to abandon it. Later, they stopped visiting her family home.
      ‘My parents-in-law forbade my husband from communicating with me. I struggled for half a year. I loved him, but I couldn’t lie to myself; I had to go my own way’, Kristine recalls.
      In the end, her husband’s relatives won over her husband. The separation process was painful, with her husband’s family trying to deprive her of her parental rights. After a long legal battle, the court decided that Kristine’s child should stay under her custody.
      ‘Now my son is with me and I am happy. He is often ill, but we are strong together. It’s definitely going to be fine. My husband doesn’t even remember us; he has a new family. I live with my parents. They are followers of the [Armenian Apostolic] Church, but they don’t mind and we respect each other’, Kristine said.
      Kristine managed to find a job as a saleswoman at a private company, but she’s still struggling to provide for her and her son.
      ‘His father bought him a bicycle for his fourth birthday. I never saw him after that. He told me that we could be back together if I started living as a “normal” person, otherwise there was no place for me to grow old by his side’, Kristine said, smiling.
      Faith can get you arrested

      Edgar Soghomonyan (Armine Avetisyan/OC Media)
      According to data provided by the Jehovah’s Witnesses to OC Media, since 1991, 19 members of the group have been arrested on charges of evading military or alternative civilian service, and sentenced to between one and one-and-a-half years in prison.
      After Armenia declared independence from the Soviet Union in 1990, members of various religious communities — especially Jehovah’s Witnesses — refused to undergo military service, for which they often ended up in prison. In 2001, a condition was set for Armenia to adopt a law on alternative civilian service before the country could become a member of the Council of Europe. A relevant bill was finally passed on 17 December 2013.
      According to the current Law on Alternative Service, one can join the armed forces without being obligated to carry or use a weapon for 36 months, or to undergo an alternative civilian service for 42 months. The usual length of military service is 24 months.
      After 2015, many Jehovah’s Witnesses and Molokan Christians who were undertaking civilian service realised that they were still under the supervision of the Ministry of Defence, and refused to continue. Several dozen were convicted on charges of desertion and sentenced to between three and eight months in prison. Their cases eventually reached the European Court of Human Rights, who ruled against Armenia, forcing them to change the law to provide a truly civilian option.
      Edgar Soghomonyan, 18, is a Jehovah’s Witness. he has already spent 4 months of alternative civilian service working in an elderly care home. His duties include feeding and taking care of people with disabilities. Edgar says that he is loved by all and he is content with his work.
      ‘I work six days a week, from nine to six. On Sundays, I’m free. The only difficulty is that the people I’m taking care of are heavy and difficult to move’, Edgar told OC Media, adding that he made the right choice because the Bible forbids him from carrying weapons.
      Jehovah’s Witnesses under the shadow of Russia

      Alvard Galstyan and Adrine Muradyan (Armine Avetisyan/OC Media)
      Rima Grigoryan, who has lived in a nursing home for two years, has been a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses for three years. She hasn’t encountered problems, but other members of her congregation often complain of discrimination.
      When members of her community approach pedestrians or knock on people’s doors and offer booklets, they are often treated with contempt. There were cases where the posters they were holding in the streets were vandalised by passers-by. Rima says that she can’t understand such treatment, because they only preach what’s good.
      There are also other religious minorities in the nursing home. The Pentecostals are especially numerous.
      Pentecostals Alvard Galstyan and Adrine Muradyan have been roommates since 1988. Over the years they have grown to be close friends and religious sisters. They are happy with their lives, although they remain isolated from society at large.
      ‘No-one persuaded us to believe or become members of their religious group, nor do we try to convince anyone. Our teaching is founded on love. We want to live in peace’, Alvard told OC Media, adding that Armenians lacked a little bit of kindness by judging people for their religion and not for the people they are.
      Alvard and Adrine are worried by the Armenian reactions to the April 2017 ban on the Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia’s Supreme Court, under its ‘anti-extremism’ law. They say that the news has intensified hatred towards religious minorities, with many Armenians openly calling for their own government to follow suit.
      http://oc-media.org/armenias-jehovahs-witnesses-enemies-of-the-state/
    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      Se plantea que los seguidores judíos, evangélicos, mormones, budistas, testigos de Jehová y ortodoxos puedan también aportar su ayuda a la religión que profesan. La Iglesia católica no puso ningún inconveniente sino todo lo contrario. Parece que en este caso el consenso político será amplio. También se habla de evitar oposiciones en días sagrados
      Justicia planteará extender la casilla de la Iglesia del IRPF a otras siete religiones
      El Ministerio de Justicia planteará durante esta legislatura la introducción en la Declaración de la Renta de una casilla como la de la Iglesia católica para las otras siete religiones con notorio arraigo en España: musulmanes, judíos, evangélicos, mormones, budistas, testigos de Jehová y ortodoxos."Uno de los problemas que se identificó fue la posibilidad de extender a las restantes confesiones con notorio arraigo, la posibilidad de que sus fieles marcaran la casilla del 0,7%", ha explicado el director general de Cooperación Jurídica Internacional y Relaciones con las Confesiones del Ministerio de Justicia, Javier Herrera García-Canturri, en una entrevista concedida a Europa Press.
      En concreto, este asunto se determinó en uno de los grupos de trabajo que se constituyeron en el Ministerio de Justicia cuando se estaba agotando la legislatura completa anterior, hace más de un año, con el fin de identificar los problemas a abordar en la siguiente legislatura, independientemente de quién gobernara.
      Herrera ha afirmado que existió "mucho consenso" sobre la posibilidad de que los fieles de esas otras religiones destinen el 0,7% de sus impuestos a su confesión, al igual que vienen haciéndolo los católicos desde el año 2007.
      Precisamente, ha asegurado que la Iglesia católica no puso ningún inconveniente sino todo lo contrario. En todo caso, aunque es competencia del Ministerio de Justicia "plantear e impulsar" esta propuesta, la responsabilidad y la decisión de implantarla dependerá del Ministerio de Hacienda, con el que Herrera ya abordó tentativamente este tema.
      "Al final de la anterior legislatura y casi como aproximación teórica, hice alguna gestión verbal con el Ministerio de Hacienda y lo que se dijo fue: 'puede ser una iniciativa interesante, cuando dejemos de estar en funciones, lo volvemos a hablar'. Hemos tardado mucho tiempo en dejar de estar en funciones pero ese es un tema a abordar, que está sobre la mesa", ha afirmado.
      El director general de Cooperación Jurídica Internacional y Relaciones con las Confesiones ha achacado al largo periodo en que el Gobierno ha estado en funciones, el hecho de que aún no se haya avanzado en este tema, que era una reivindicación, especialmente, de los protestantes. "Un Gobierno privado de capacidad legislativa no puede entrar a modificar una norma como sería la normativa en materia del impuesto sobre la Renta", ha matizado.
      Evitar oposiciones en días sagrados
      Asimismo, para este nuevo año se ha planteado incluir otra casilla en las solicitudes para las oposiciones a través de la cual los estudiantes puedan manifestar la inconveniencia de realizar el examen en un día determinado por motivos religiosos.
      El problema radica, según ha explicado Herrera, en el hecho de que la mayoría de las pruebas de oposiciones se convocan en sábado, que es el día sagrado para los judíos. Con esta casilla, los tribunales podrán saber de antemano cuántos opositores se encuentran con este problema y así determinar la solución.
      "Es algo que se previó en unas reuniones que tuvimos con el Ministerio de Sanidad para los exámenes MIR, una de las opciones que se está barajando para el año que viene es poder plantear esta posibilidad", ha precisado el subdirector de Relaciones con las Confesiones, Jaime Rossell.
      En el caso del año 2017, cuando se han contabilizado tres o cuatro opositores judíos, el examen seguirá celebrándose el sábado pero estas personas deberán permanecer durante todo el día en un aula cerrada con miembros del tribunal hasta la hora en que el Instituto Nacional de Meteorología determine que es el ocaso, momento en que termina el 'sabbat' y en el cual podrán comenzar a examinarse.
      Evitar los exámenes en Ramadán
      En cuanto a la petición planteada por el presidente de la Comisión Islámica de España (CIE), Riay Tatary, de adelantar la hora de los exámenes de Selectividad al coincidir con el Ramadán o Mes del Ayuno, Rossell ha indicado que las consejerías de educación que se veían afectadas se han comprometido a estudiarlo.
      Esta "sensibilización" en cuanto a la pluralidad religiosa también se ha extendido a las empresas, según ha indicado Rossell. Así, ha explicado que "cada vez va siendo más común que haya empresarios que hacen coincidir al empleado su mes de vacaciones por ejemplo con el Ramadán" o que le permiten librar en una festividad de su religión, por ejemplo, la fiesta del Sacrificio, a cambio de trabajar el día de Navidad.
      Incluir las fiestas de otras religiones en el calendario laboral
      En este sentido, Herrera ha afirmado que se está "contemplando" la petición de los musulmanes de España de incluir alguna de sus festividades religiosas, como la de Ruptura del Ayuno, en el calendario laboral de 2018 --en el de 2017, es festivo en Ceuta y Melilla el día de la fiesta del Sacrificio--. No obstante, ha precisado que es "complicado" porque el número total de fiestas no se puede modificar y si se quiere introducir otra, tendría que ser en sustitución de una fiesta cristiana o civil.
      No está sobre la mesa modificar los acuerdos con la Santa Sede
      Sobre las relaciones del Estado con la Iglesia católica, Herrera ha aclarado que "la posibilidad de modificar los acuerdos (entre el Estado y la Santa Sede) no es un tema que en absoluto esté sobre la mesa". Por ello, ha indicado que la Iglesia no tiene por qué estar preocupada ante las propuestas de algunas formaciones de derogarlos, unos planteamientos que, a juicio de Herrera, se escuchan más en campaña electoral que fuera. "Saben que no hay ningún motivo, ninguna necesidad y ninguna voluntad", ha añadido.
      En lo que se refiere a la confesión católica, el Ministerio de Justicia también se ha comprometido a acompañarla en sus gestiones con el Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social para articular una fórmula en la Ley para que los misioneros que retornan a España estén cubiertos por la Seguridad Social.
      Por otro lado, en este 2016 que ha terminado se ha cumplido el primer año desde la entrada en vigor de la Ley para la concesión de la nacionalidad a los sefardíes y Herrera admite que son "pocos" los que han obtenido la nacionalidad por esta nueva normativa. Si bien, recuerda que prácticamente acaba de echar a andar.
      Se prorroga un año más la ley para que los sefardíes puedan solicitar la nacionalidad española
      Además, ante algunas peticiones de los judíos españoles en relación a los requisitos que establece la ley como la necesidad de comparecer ante notario en España o el examen, el director general de Cooperación Jurídica Internacional y Relaciones con las Confesiones ha adelantado que "cabría la posibilidad de introducir modificaciones" si al final del periodo de vigencia de la norma "se ve que los requisitos que se establecieron, realmente han supuesto un obstáculo insalvable" para algunos sefardíes.
      Asimismo, ha adelantado que ya se puede "dar por hecho" que el plazo para solicitar la nacionalidad se prorrogará un año más, una posibilidad que contempla la ley. Herrera ha reconocido que el año 2016, "un poco extraño" por estar el Gobierno en funciones, ha sido de "consolidación" de las reformas realizadas en la anterior legislatura. También considera que ha sido "rico" en libertad religiosa aunque admite que "la gestión de la libertad religiosa es siempre una labor inacabada". Sobre los problemas que hayan podido surgir con las confesiones, los ha achacado "en gran medida" al "desconocimiento de ayuntamientos y comunidades autónomas".
      Por ello, ha anunciado que antes de que finalice el mes de febrero de 2017 convocarán la primera reunión al completo del Comité Asesor de CCAA, un órgano que ya estaba constituido pero que hasta ahora solo contaba con representantes de menos de la mitad de las CCAA. En la plenaria de este Comité, informarán a los representantes de las CCAA y de la Federación de Municipios y Provincias sobre cómo abordar las problemáticas con las que se pueden encontrar, por ejemplo, el hiyab en el colegio, los enterramientos u otros.
    • By The Librarian
      Special Preaching Campaign in Armenia
    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      Me llamó la atención la barba de uno de los hermanos que sostiene la pancarta  
       

    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      I noticed the beard  
       

    • By The Librarian
      Armenian Caleb and Sophia drawn on an iPad
      Have you drawn your own versions of them? Share a copy below:
    • Guest Nicole
    • Guest Nicole
    • By The Librarian
      70 happy JW's who survived imprisonment for being conscientious objectors
      Source
    • By El Bibliotecario
      QUE MOMENTO TAN EMOCIONANTE!!
      26 de Marzo del 2016
      ARMÊNIA LIBERTA 70 JOVENS TESTIGOS DE JEOVÁ QUE FUERON PRESOS POR
      REUSARSE A SERVIR A LA MILICIA Y NO QUERER USAR ARMAS E IR PARA A GUERRA.
      GRACIAS A NUESTRO PADRE Jehová Todo salió Bien.
      Fuente
  • Forum Statistics

    61,696
    Total Topics
    114,698
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    16,513
    Total Members
    1,592
    Most Online
    pastel
    Newest Member
    pastel
    Joined




  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After today's WT study I was reminded of how much simpler and clearer we have become. There are still some speculative elements there, but overall its nothing compared to some past WT studies, and although this might be slightly off topic here (but still on topic with regard to "difficult doctrine") I would just like to post one example from 1968. (WT 68/8/15)  Either people were more patient and studious than they are now, or even back then, perhaps only a handful were able to wrap their heads around this study. I will be bold enough to say many may have just heard "end in 1975", and that's it. Why Are You Looking Forward to 1975? 1, 2. (a) What has sparked special interest in the year 1975, and with what results? (b) But what questions are raised? WHAT about all this talk concerning the year 1975? Lively discussions, some based on speculation, have burst into flame during recent months among serious students of the Bible. Their interest has been kindled by the belief that 1975 will mark the end of 6,000 years of human history since Adam’s creation. The nearness of such an important date indeed fires the imagination and presents unlimited possibilities for discussion. 2 But wait! How do we know their calculations are correct? What basis is there for saying Adam was created nearly 5,993 years ago? Does the one Book that can be implicitly trusted for its truthful historical accuracy, namely, the Inspired Word of Jehovah, the Holy Bible, give support and credence to such a conclusion? 3. Is the date for Adam’s creation as found in many copies of the Bible part of the inspired Scriptures, and do all agree on the date? 3 In the marginal references of the Protestant Authorized or King James Version, and in the footnotes of certain editions of the Catholic Douay version, the date of man’s creation is said to be 4004 B.C.E. This marginal date, however, is no part of the inspired text of the Holy Scriptures, since it was first suggested more than fifteen centuries after the last Bible writer died, and was not added to any edition of the Bible until 1701 C.E. It is an insertion based upon the conclusions of an Irish prelate, the Anglican Archbishop James Ussher (1581-1656). Ussher’s chronology was only one of the many sincere efforts made during the past centuries to determine the time of Adam’s creation. A hundred years ago when a count was taken, no less than 140 different timetables had been published by serious scholars. In such chronologies the calculations as to when Adam was created vary all the way from 3616 B.C.E. to 6174 B.C.E., with one wild guess set at 20,000 B.C.E. Such conflicting answers contained in the voluminous libraries around the world certainly tend to compound the confusion when seeking an answer to the above questions. 4. What have we learned in our previous study, and, hence, what are we now prepared to do? 4 In the previous article we learned from the Inspired Writings themselves, independent of the uninspired marginal notes of some Bibles, that the seventy years of desolation of the land of Judah began to count about October 1, 607 B.C.E. The beginning of this seventy-year period was obviously tied to its ending, that is, with the fall of Babylon in 539 B.C.E. So with 607 B.C.E. as dependably fixed on our Gregorian calendar as the absolute date of 539 B.C.E. we are prepared to move farther back in the count of time, to the dating of other important events in Bible history. For instance, the years when Saul, David and Solomon reigned successively over God’s chosen people can now be dated in terms of the present-day calendar. 5. What history-making events took place in 997 B.C.E.? 5 At the death of Solomon his kingdom was split into two parts. The southern two-tribe part, composed of Judah and Benjamin, continued to be ruled by Solomon’s descendants, and was known as the kingdom of Judah. The northern ten tribes made up the kingdom of Israel, sometimes called “Samaria” after the name of its later capital city, and were ruled over by Jeroboam and his successors. By our applying the prophetic time period of 390 years found in Ezekiel 4:1-9 with regard to Jerusalem’s destruction the death of Solomon is found to be in the year 997 B.C.E. This was 390 years before the destruction of Jerusalem in 607 B.C.E. ISRAEL’S ERRORS CARRIED 390 YEARS 6, 7. What time periods are referred to in Ezekiel 4:1-9? 6 Notice what is said on this matter by the prophet Ezekiel: 7 “And you, O son of man, take for yourself a brick, and you must put it before you, and engrave upon it a city, even Jerusalem. And you must lay siege against it . . . It is a sign to the house of Israel. And as for you, lie upon your left side, and you must lay the error of the house of Israel upon it. For the number of the days that you will lie upon it you will carry their error. And I myself must give to you the years of their error to the number of three hundred and ninety days, and you must carry the error of the house of Israel. And you must complete them. And you must lie upon your right side in the second case, and you must carry the error of the house of Judah forty days. A day for a year, a day for a year, is what I have given you. . . . And as for you, take for yourself wheat and barley and broad beans and lentils and millet and spelt, and you must put them in one utensil and make them into bread for you, for the number of the days that you are lying upon your side; three hundred and ninety days you will eat it.”—Ezek. 4:1-9. 8. When did the carrying of the “error” of the southern kingdom end? 8 This chapter 4 of Ezekiel, was not recounting past historical events but was prophecy of future events. It was telling of the time in the future when the glorious city of Jerusalem would be besieged and its inhabitants taken captive, all of which occurred in 607 B.C.E. So the forty years spoken of in the case of Judah ended in that year. The “error” of the northern kingdom, said to be carried for 390 years, was nearly tenfold greater when compared with the error of Judah carried for 40 years. When, then, did these 390 years end? 9. What indicates the “error” of the northern kingdom also ended in 607 B.C.E.? 9 They were not terminated in 740 B.C.E., when Samaria was destroyed, for the simple fact that Ezekiel enacted this prophetic drama sometime after “the fifth year of the exile of King Jehoiachin,” which would make the termination not earlier than 613 B.C.E., that is, 127 years after the destruction of Samaria by Assyria. (Ezek. 1:2) Since this whole prophetic drama plainly pointed forward to the destruction of Jerusalem, and since both the house of Israel and the house of Judah were in reality one inseparable covenant-bound people, the remnant of whom would not be a divided people upon their return from exile, there is only one reasonable conclusion, namely, the errors of both houses ran concurrently and terminated at the same time in 607 B.C.E. In this way the 70 years of desolation of the land of Judah ended 70 years after the termination of carrying the error of both houses, so that thus a remnant of both houses could return to the site of Jerusalem. 10. So when did the “error” of Israel begin? 10 If the “error of the house of Israel” ended in 607, its beginning, 390 years prior thereto, was in 997 B.C.E. It began the year that King Solomon died and Jeroboam committed error, yes, great error, in that Jeroboam, whose domain was ripped off from the house of David, “proceeded to part Israel from following Jehovah,” causing them “to sin with a great sin.”—2 Ki. 17:21. DATE OF EXODUS, 1513 B.C.E. 11, 12. What other event in man’s history are we now prepared to date, and with the aid of what key text? 11 Looking back into the distant past we see another milestone in man’s history, the never-to-be-forgotten exodus of the Israelites from Egyptian slavery, under the leadership of Moses. Were it not for Jehovah’s faithful Word the Bible, it would be impossible to locate this great event accurately on the calendar, for Egyptian hieroglyphics are conspicuously silent concerning the humiliating defeat handed that first world power by Jehovah. But with the Bible’s chronology, how relatively simple it is to date that memorable event! 12 At 1 Kings 6:1 we read: “And it came about in the four hundred and eightieth year after the sons of Israel came out from the land of Egypt, in the fourth year, in the month of Ziv, that is, the second month, after Solomon became king over Israel, that he proceeded to build the house to Jehovah.” 13, 14. (a) On the Gregorian calendar, in what year did Solomon begin to reign? (b) In what year did he begin the building of the temple? 13 With this information one has only to determine what calendar year Solomon began building the temple, and it is then an easy matter to figure when Pharaoh’s army was destroyed in the Red Sea. 14 “And the days that Solomon had reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel were forty years.” (1 Ki. 11:42) This means that his last full regnal year ended in the spring of 997 B.C.E.* Adding 40 to 997 gives 1037 B.C.E., the year that Solomon began his peaceful reign. He did not begin the temple building, as the account says, until the second month of the fourth year of his reign, which means he had ruled a full three years and one month. Thus subtracting 3 years from 1037 one gets 1034 B.C.E., the year that the building work began. The time of the year was the second month Ziv, that is, April-May. This, the Bible says, was “in the four hundred and eightieth year” after the Israelites left Egypt. 15. (a) Explain the difference between a cardinal and an ordinal number. (b) So when did the Israelites leave Egypt? 15 Anytime we put a “th” on the end of a number, for instance on the number 10, saying 10th, the number is changed from a cardinal to an ordinal number. When one speaks about playing baseball in the tenth inning of the game, it means that nine full innings have already been played, but only part of the tenth; ten innings are not yet completed. Likewise, when the Bible uses an ordinal number, saying that the building of the temple began in the 480th year after the Israelites left Egypt, and when that particular year on the calendar is known to be 1034 B.C.E., then we add 479 full years (not 480) to 1034 and arrive at the date 1513 B.C.E., the year of the Exodus. It too was springtime, Passover time, the 14th day of the month Nisan. HOW LONG SINCE THE FLOOD? 16. How far back in history have we now penetrated, and what are the prospects of probing even deeper? 16 Already with the help supplied by the Bible we have accurately measured back from the spring of this year 1968 C.E. to the spring of 1513 B.C.E., a total of 3,480 years. With the continued faithful memory and accurate historical record of Jehovah’s Holy Word we can penetrate even deeper into the past, back to the flood of Noah’s day. 17. In recounting Israel’s experiences, to what events and to what time period does Stephen refer? 17 Stephen, the first martyred footstep follower of Jesus Christ, referred to what Jehovah said would befall Abraham’s offspring. “Moreover, God spoke to this effect, that his seed would be alien residents in a foreign land and the people would enslave them and afflict them for four hundred years.” (Acts 7:6; Gen. 15:13) Stephen here mentions three of Israel’s past experiences: As alien residents in a foreign land, as people in slavery, and as people afflicted for four hundred years. 18. What argues against the conclusion that these events were separate experiences following one another in consecutive order? 18 It would be a mistake to assume that all three of these experiences were of equal duration, or that they were separate individual experiences that followed one another in consecutive order. It was long after their entrance into Egypt as aliens that they were enslaved, more than 70 years later, and sometime after the death of Joseph. Rather, Stephen was saying that within the same 400-year period in which they were afflicted, they were also enslaved and were also alien residents. 19. How do we know the Israelites were “aliens” before entering Egypt? 19 Please note that, when Stephen said they were “alien residents in a foreign land . . . for four hundred years,” he did not say and he did not mean to imply that they were not alien residents before entering Egypt. So it is a mistake to insist that this text proves the Israelites were in Egypt for four hundred years. It is true that, upon entering Egypt and being presented before Pharaoh for the first time, Joseph’s brothers said: “We have come to reside as aliens in the land.” But they did not say nor did they mean that up until then they had not been alien residents, for on the same occasion their father Jacob, when asked by Pharaoh how old he was, declared: “The days of the years of my alien residences are a hundred and thirty years.” And not only had Jacob spent his whole lifetime as an alien resident before coming to Egypt, but he told Pharaoh that his forefathers before him also had been alien residents.—Gen. 47:4-9. 20. When did these 400 years end, and when did they begin? 20 Since the affliction of Israel ended in 1513 B.C.E., it must have begun in 1913, 400 years earlier. That year would correspond to the time that Isaac was afflicted by Ishmael “poking fun” at him on the day that Isaac was weaned. At the time, Isaac was five years old, and this was long before the Israelites entered Egypt.—Gen. 21:8, 9. 21, 22. Were the Israelites 430 years in Egypt exclusively, and how do certain ancient manuscripts shed light on this point? 21 Well, then, how long were the Israelites down in Egypt as alien residents? Exodus 12:40, 41 says: “And the dwelling of the sons of Israel, who had dwelt in Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years. And it came about at the end of the four hundred and thirty years, it even came about on this very day that all the armies of Jehovah went out of the land of Egypt.” 22 Here Ex 12 verse 40 in the Septuagint reads: “But the dwelling of the sons of Israel which they [and their fathers, Alexandrine MS] dwelt in the land of Egypt AND IN THE LAND OF CANAAN [was] four hundred and thirty years long.” The Samaritan Pentateuch reads: “IN THE LAND OF CANAAN and in the land of Egypt.” Thus both of these versions, which are based on Hebrew texts older than the Masoretic, include the words “in the land of Canaan” together with the word “Egypt.” 23. (a) So how long were the Israelites actually in Egypt, and how does Paul confirm this? (b) Explain the difference between the 400 and the 430 years mentioned in the Scriptures. 23 From the time that Abraham entered Canaan until Isaac’s birth was 25 years;* from that time until Jacob’s birth, 60 more years; and after that it was another 130 years before Jacob entered Egypt. All together this makes a total of 215 years, exactly half of the 430 years, spent in Canaan before moving in to Egypt. (Gen. 12:4; 21:5; 25:26; 47:9) The apostle Paul, under inspiration, also confirms that from the making of the Abrahamic covenant at the time the patriarch moved into Canaan, it was 430 years down to the institution of the Law covenant.—Gal. 3:17. 24, 25. The Flood began in what calendar year, and how long was this before Abraham entered Canaan? 24 By adding this 430 years to the 1513 it puts us back to 1943 B.C.E., the time when Abraham first entered Canaan following the death of his father Terah in Haran, Mesopotamia. It is now only a matter of adding up the years of a few generations to date the Flood correctly. The figures are given in Genesis, chapters 11 and 12, and may be summarized as follows: From start of Flood To Arpachshad’s birth (Gen. 11:10) 2 years To birth of Shelah (11:12) 35 “ To birth of Eber (11:14) 30 “ To birth of Peleg (11:26) 34 “ To birth of Reu (11:18) 30 “ To birth of Serug (11:20) 32 “ To birth of Nahor (11:22) 30 “ To birth of Terah (11:24) 29 “ To death of Terah in Haran, and Abram’s departure to Canaan at age of 75 (11:32; 12:4) 205 “ Total 427 years 25 Adding these 427 years to the year 1943 B.C.E. dates the beginning of the Deluge at 2370 B.C.E., 4,337 years ago. 6,000 YEARS FROM ADAM’S CREATION 26, 27. (a) How long before the Flood was Adam created? In what year? (b) What indicates that Adam was created in the fall of the year? 26 In a similar manner it is only necessary to add up the following years involving ten pre-Flood generations to get the date of Adam’s creation, namely: From Adam’s creation To birth of Seth (Gen. 5:3) 130 years To birth of Enosh (5:6) 105 “ To birth of Kenan (5:9) 90 “ To birth of Mahalalel (5:12) 70 “ To birth of Jared (5:15) 65 “ To birth of Enoch (5:18) 162 “ To birth of Methuselah (5:21) 65 “ To birth of Lamech (5:25) 187 “ To birth of Noah (5:28, 29) 182 “ To beginning of Flood (7:6) 600 “ Total 1,656 years 27 Adding this figure 1,656 to 2,370 gives 4026 B.C.E., the Gregorian calendar year in which Adam was created. Since man naturally began to count time with his own beginning, and since man’s most ancient calendars started each year in the autumn, it is reasonable to assume that the first man Adam was created in the fall of the year. 28. How does this chronology differ from Ussher’s in regard to Adam’s creation? 28 Thus, through a careful independent study by dedicated Bible scholars who have pursued the subject for a number of years, and who have not blindly followed some traditional chronological calculations of Christendom, we have arrived at a date for Adam’s creation that is 22 years more distant in the past than Ussher’s figure. This means time is running out two decades sooner than traditional chronology anticipates. 29. Why be concerned with the date of Adam’s creation? 29 After much of the mathematics and genealogies, really, of what benefit is this information to us today? Is it not all dead history, as uninteresting and profitless as walking through a cemetery copying old dates off tombstones? After all, why should we be any more interested in the date of Adam’s creation than in the birth of King Tut? Well, for one thing, if 4,026 is added to 1,968 (allowing for the lack of a zero year between C.E. and B.C.E.) one gets a total of 5,993 years, come this autumn, since Adam’s creation. That means, in the fall of the year 1975, a little over seven years from now (and not in 1997 as would be the case if Ussher’s figures were correct), it will be 6,000 years since the creation of Adam, the father of all mankind! ADAM CREATED AT CLOSE OF “SIXTH DAY” 30. What may occur before 1975, but what attitude should we take? 30 Are we to assume from this study that the battle of Armageddon will be all over by the autumn of 1975, and the long-looked-for thousand-year reign of Christ will begin by then? Possibly, but we wait to see how closely the seventh thousand-year period of man’s existence coincides with the sabbathlike thousand-year reign of Christ. If these two periods run parallel with each other as to the calendar year, it will not be by mere chance or accident but will be according to Jehovah’s loving and timely purposes. Our chronology, however, which is reasonably accurate (but admittedly not infallible), at the best only points to the autumn of 1975 as the end of 6,000 years of man’s existence on earth. It does not necessarily mean that 1975 marks the end of the first 6,000 years of Jehovah’s seventh creative “day.” Why not? Because after his creation Adam lived some time during the “sixth day,” which unknown amount of time would need to be subtracted from Adam’s 930 years, to determine when the sixth seven-thousand-year period or “day” ended, and how long Adam lived into the “seventh day.” And yet the end of that sixth creative “day” could end within the same Gregorian calendar year of Adam’s creation. It may involve only a difference of weeks or months, not years. 31. What do the first two chapters of Genesis disclose? 31 In regard to Adam’s creation it is good to read carefully what the Bible says. Moses in compiling the book of Genesis referred to written records or “histories” that predated the Flood. The first of these begins with Genesis 1:1 and ends at Genesis 2:4 with the words, “This is the history of the heavens and the earth . . . ” The second historical document begins with Genesis 2:5 and ends with Ge verse two of chapter five. Hence we have two separate accounts of creation from slightly different points of view. In the second of these accounts, in Genesis 2:19, the original Hebrew verb translated “was forming” is in the progressive imperfect form. This does not mean that the animals and birds were created after Adam was created. Genesis 1:20-28 shows it does not mean that. So, in order to avoid contradiction between Ge chapter one and chapter two, Genesis 2:19, 20 must be only a parenthetical remark thrown in to explain the need for creating a “helper” for man. So the progressive Hebrew verb form could also be rendered as “had been forming.”—See Rotherham’s translation (Ro), also Leeser’s (Le). 32. What indicates the sixth creative day did not end immediately with Adam’s creation? 32 These two creation accounts in the book of Genesis, though differing slightly in the treatment of the material, are in perfect agreement with each other on all points, including the fact that Eve was created after Adam. So not until after this event did the sixth creative day come to an end. Exactly how soon after Adam’s creation is not disclosed. “After that [Adam and Eve’s creation] God saw everything he had made and, look! it was very good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a sixth day.” (Gen. 1:31) After the sixth creative day ends, the seventh one begins. 33. (a) How do we know the end of the sixth creative day came very soon after Adam’s creation? (b) How does Genesis 1:31 prove the sixth day ended before Adam and Eve sinned? 33 This time between Adam’s creation and the beginning of the seventh day, the day of rest, let it be noted, need not have been a long time. It could have been a rather short one. The naming of the animals by Adam, and his discovery that there was no complement for himself, required no great length of time. The animals were in subjection to Adam; they were peaceful; they came under God’s leading; they were not needing to be chased down and caught. It took Noah only seven days to get the same kinds of animals, male and female, into the Ark. (Gen. 7:1-4) Eve’s creation was quickly accomplished, ‘while Adam was sleeping.’ (Gen. 2:21) So the lapse of time between Adam’s creation and the end of the sixth creative day, though unknown, was a comparatively short period of time. The pronouncement at the end of the sixth day, “God saw everything he had made and, look! it was very good,” proves that the beginning of the great seventh day of the creative week did not wait until after Adam and Eve sinned and were expelled from the Garden of Eden. 1975! . . . AND FAR BEYOND! 34. What has brought about a better understanding of Bible chronology? 34 Bible chronology is an interesting study by which historic events are placed in their order of occurrence along the stream of time. The Watch Tower Society over the years has endeavored to keep its associates abreast with the latest scholarship that proves consistent with historic and prophetic events recorded in the Scriptures. Major problems in sacred chronology have been straightened out either due to fulfillment of Bible prophecies or by reason of archaeological discoveries or because better Bible translations convey more clearly the records of the original languages. However, several knotty problems of chronology of a minor nature are not yet resolved. For example, at the time of the exodus from Egypt when Jehovah changed the beginning of the year from autumn time on the secular calendar to spring time on the sacred calendar, was there, in the Jewish calendar, a loss or a gain of six months?—Ex. 12:1, 2. 35. Why is this no time for indifference and complacency? 35 One thing is absolutely certain, Bible chronology reinforced with fulfilled Bible prophecy shows that six thousand years of man’s existence will soon be up, yes, within this generation! (Matt. 24:34) This is, therefore, no time to be indifferent and complacent. This is not the time to be toying with the words of Jesus that “concerning that day and hour nobody knows, neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father.” (Matt. 24:36) To the contrary, it is a time when one should be keenly aware that the end of this system of things is rapidly coming to its violent end. Make no mistake, it is sufficient that the Father himself knows both the “day and hour”! 36. What helpful example did the apostles leave us in this regard? 36 Even if one cannot see beyond 1975, is this any reason to be less active? The apostles could not see even this far; they knew nothing about 1975. All they could see was a short time ahead in which to finish the work assigned to them. (1 Pet. 4:7) Hence, there was a ring of alarm and a cry of urgency in all their writings. (Acts 20:20; 2 Tim. 4:2) And rightly so. If they had delayed or dillydallied and had been complacent with the idea the end was some thousands of years off they would never have finished running the race set before them. No, they ran hard and they ran fast, and they won! It was a life or death matter with them.—1 Cor. 9:24; 2 Tim. 4:7; Heb. 12:1. 37. So what will you be doing between now and 1975? And beyond that, what? 37 So too with Jehovah’s faithful witnesses in this latter half of the twentieth century. They have the true Christian point of view. Their strenuous evangelistic activity is not something peculiar to this present decade. They have not dedicated their lives to serve Jehovah only until 1975. Christians have been running this way ever since Christ Jesus blazed the trail and commanded his disciples, “Follow me!” So keep this same mental attitude in you that was in Christ Jesus. Let nothing slow you down or cause you to tire and give out. Those who will flee Babylon the Great and this Satanic system of things are now running for their lives, headed for God’s kingdom, and they will not stop at 1975. O no! They will keep on in this glorious way that leads to everlasting life, praising and serving Jehovah for ever and ever!     You are referring to Luke 10:17,18 "Then the 70 returned with joy, saying: “Lord, even the demons are made subject to us by the use of your name.” At that he said to them: “I see Satan already fallen like lightning from heaven".  But one of the cross references to Satan falling is Revelation 12:7-9   "And war broke out in heaven: Miʹcha·el and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8  but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9  So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him". I wonder why, since as you say we are to understand that it referred to the power Satan had over Jesus and his disciples. In a way no, but I think we are meant to see that the world in general was brought into more of a turmoil than it had been before, with the world warring on a worldwide scale, with lethal weapons capable of total world destruction I am thinking rather than using the word "defeat" (because Satan won't be defeated until after the 1000 years) the purpose of the battle in heaven in 1914 was to cleanse the heavens of his evil presence. Then during Armageddon it will be to bind him and put him in "jail" for a period of time. So no, I don't think there are several stages of defeat.   We are to believe that what changed after the battle in 1914 was the world in general.   Yes indeed. But how fatal would it really be if we ignored Jesus words about not knowing the day or hour?
    • The music video for Lionel Richie's "Hello" directed by Bob Giraldi, attracts attention as it tells the story of a music teacher (played by Lionel Richie) who falls in love with his blind student. "Hello is it me you're looking for?" is quite an insensitive pick up line to use on a blind woman.   Ah, the 80s, when people thought teachers stalking their disabled students was romantic...    
    • Quote @b4ucuhear " For example, we realized that the “superior authorities” mentioned in Romans 13:1 are, not Jehovah God and Jesus Christ, but the political rulers " BUT the original teaching by the Bible Students was that the 'superior authorities' was the political rulers. It was fully understood in the first place. So, why was false reasoning used to give false teaching ? Obviously no Holy Spirit involved there. So you cannot say that it was new light or better understanding when it was originally known anyway 
    • “We Must Obey God as Ruler Rather Than Men”  This is something that not sound to me as doctrine. This sound as standpoint. Also we have to take context. Apostle responded with this statement as position on Sanhedrin's command that they must not preaching....about what? Peter and John answered: “We cannot stop speaking about the things we have seen and heard.”  Well, this is original context. Some other examples speaking about similar things where JHVH and Jesus' servants refused to do something or have done something. Life has got to be more complexe through centuries, so we have now more explanations and interpretations how should look like today's reality of "obey god rather than man". Even things about education come to be viewed through this sort of glasses. Advice to not going to higher education coming from "spiritual place" as god's instruction through GB. Not obeying counsel/advice/recommendation in this matter is considered as not putting god on first place in life. But contrary, own selfish ambitions. As consequence this could be understand that you listen/obey yourself and not god.  About what JW's of today can making claim as apostles did? What things JW today "have seen and heard"  that make their standpoint so firm to obey god as ruler? They have seen and heard only their faith and beliefs. Because they have not seen and heard nothing similar what apostles or first christians experienced.   And this is good way how system making doctrines that sounds like "the truth". And after some time you will read new articles with similar explanation :))) ... year after year. ● At times there are changes in viewpoint on Biblical subjects discussed in the Watch Tower Society’s publications. We speak of what we believe as “the truth.” But does “truth” change? Yes, it changes. Because you believe in new, advanced knowledge. "The Truth" should not to be knowledge, but Principle. Because Principle is older than this what we calling "the Truth". Even in JW understanding when they speaking about something that is so firm and deep, unchangeable, they using word "Principle" not word "Truth". Principles in Old Testament, for example, that stood behind some laws of Moses, are visible in New Testament too.  In that context we can talk about Moses Law as "The Truth". Perhaps old Israel people used same or similar wording to describe what they think and feel about God' Words. But this kind of "Truth" and their "Truth" are gone. (Not completely, because we have Israel of today.) So, "The Truth" was changed, even more, with time it had been abandoned gradually by new formed Jew congregations. "Old truth" became useless as sort of knowledge about what, how, when and why to be practiced in daily life. Principles stayed. Love God, love neighbor are most known.
    • ronan keating singing a song from the film notting hill   Keith Whitley - When You Say Nothing at All  
    • This song does make you want to "hustle" in whatever you are doing. 😉  
  • Popular Now

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.