Jump to content
The World News Media

If Armageddon happened how would we all be killed?


Jack Ryan

Recommended Posts


  • Views 4k
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

@Witness He may be referring to haters of God, which was the case with enemies of God as seen in the Old Testament, examples like Gideon to both Zebah and Zalmunna, both of them who clearly were not f

I do not understand how Anyone could believe in the pagan doctrine of the trinity. It truly is Not Biblical.

Would we just drop dead? Would it be painful? Would we suffer? Would we know? If we die wouldn’t our sins be forgiven anyways cause if not that makes god a liar. No one ever talked About how we would

Posted Images

  • Member

NÃO SE PREOCUPE COM ISSO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No Armagedon, aqueles que ridicularizam a promessa de Deus, onde os fiéis viverão para sempre num paraíso terrestre fazendo a vontade Dele, e ainda por cima fazem hoje uma oposição renhida à Sua vontade, "poderão" perder o privilégio de viver aqui na Terra para todo o sempre! 

JÁ É HORA DE VOCÊ CAIR NA REALIDADE!!!! 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
20 hours ago, Querotevernoparaiso said:

JÁ É HORA DE VOCÊ CAIR NA REALIDADE!!!! 

Maybe he IS finally falling into reality.  Armageddon is fought in the valley of DECISION; the time period where both truth and deceitful lies are presented. 2 Thess 2:9-12  It is the making up of one's mind to love one or the other, and the ultimate judgment of each one of us, when we face Christ.     Joel 3:14;   Dan 7:9,10,22; John 5:22

2 Pet 3:7 -  But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Jer 23:29 - “Is not My word like a fire?” says the Lord,
“And like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?

Any casualties are the resulting influence Satan has over this world. 1 John 5:19   Doesn't he already perform that now?  Out of rage of losing his earthly kingdom, who knows what he'll do.  Rev 12:11,7,8

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@Witness He may be referring to haters of God, which was the case with enemies of God as seen in the Old Testament, examples like Gideon to both Zebah and Zalmunna, both of them who clearly were not fans of God and were quick to mock, resulting in Gideon taking his blade to take them both out himself instead of Jether, Gideon's firstborn doing it himself. And of course there will also be a gnashing of the teeth and wailing of those who assume they are for God, but clearly ate out of the hands of falsehood.

As for the verses in question, John's vision is prophetic. The Angel of the Abyss is regarding the one called Satan the Devil and that part in what is also mentioned, in whole, points to Revelations 9:1 and 20:1-3.

 

That being said, for anyone who does not read Portuguese, what @Querotevernoparaiso said is the following:

DO NOT WORRY ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In Armageddon, those who ridicule God's promise, where believers will forever live in an earthly paradise doing His will, and today make strong opposition to His will, "may" lose the privilege of living here on earth for all the time!

IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO FALL INTO REALITY !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
26 minutes ago, BillyTheKid46 said:

Nice! it's refreshing to find someone that understands scripture. Unlike Portuguese, we use google translate for that, and we use linguists to make sense of ancient writings. It doesn't matter just about anything else, but an interpretation is a must.

Agreed, also I actually did use Google Translate for that one, if it was French or Spanish I wouldn't have a need for it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@BillyTheKid46 French is my birth language, but some of my family speaks Spanish also, so I have 2 languages including English, which I find easy to learn granted at the time my family had already moved to the US. I know other languages too, but I'd give myself a 5 out of 10 for them, but for Greek and Hebrew, I do not speak it, but I can understand a bit of both in terms of writing and some words and language forms, the Hebrew was a bit of self-teaching though and learned a bit more from a man named Jeff A. Benner, a Hebrew Professor and Researcher.

For Bible Translations I mainly use the ESV version, secondary being the AS, and on rare occasions the YLT and or NIV.

As for the other things mentioned, I'd have to look into them, but I do dwell heavily on Biblical Hermeneutics.

That being said, the google translation is indeed a good tool when it comes to seeing what someone is saying, although it isn't always correct. And as for the verses in question, examples from the Bible are clear and understood when brought up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@James Thomas Rook Jr. 

Qual é mesmo a pergunta? 

EU NÃO ENTENDI!!! Nem usando o Google translate! 

Acho que... o problema do mau entendimento, NÃO FOI DO TRANSLATE DO GOOGLE!!! 

MAS SIM... da sua infeliz tentativa em comparar algo que vai ser bom para a humanidade, assim como foi prometido, com os filmes de ficção que ridicularizam esta magnífica promessa de Deus :

* Não haverá mais morte, guerras, fome, doenças, catástrofes, etc...etc.. 

A HUMANIDADE VIVERÁ NA TERRA EM CONDIÇÕES PARADISÍACAS!!!! 

Eu... se fosse você... não gozava com o aviso prévio do nosso Criador, porque o que promete Jeová, CUMPRE!!! 

JÁ ESTÁ MAIS DO QUE NA HORA DE VOCÊ LEVAR A SÉRIO A PALAVRA DELE!!! 

NÃO ESTAMOS NO TEMPO PARA BRINCADEIRAS!!! 

RETORNE, RETORNE, RETORNE PARA JEOVÁ DE TODO O SEU CORAÇÃO!!! 

 

Mas cada cabeça sua sentença! 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
Obrigado por seu conselho ... mas muitos dos meus comentários são 
o que chamamos em inglês "tongue in cheek", ou seja, uma piada
leve e sutil com algum elemento de verdade.

Eu suspeito que isso não se traduza bem em outros idiomas sem um
especialista muito real em ambos os idiomas, que tenha senso de
 humor e entenda o humor em ambos os idiomas.

É claro que, para o humor ser engraçado, deve conter ALGUM 
elemento de verdade.

Thank you for your advice .... but a LOT of my comments are what we call in English "tongue in cheek", that is to say a subtle light hearted joke with some element of truth.


I suspect this does not translate well into other languages without a very real expert in both languages, who has a sense of humor, and understands the humor in both languages.


Of course, for humor to be funny, it must contain SOME element of truth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@James Thomas Rook Jr. @James Thomas Rook Jr. 

The joke lies in the incredulity of the people in the real amargedon because of the movies that speak of it?

Do not even understand this English humor?? 

MAS o seu português está excelente!!!  É de certeza melhor do que o meu inglês do Google!  ?

SERÁ QUE A SUA AMABILIDADE PODERIA EXPLICAR-ME A PIADA EM PORTUGUÊS? 

Obrigada! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

The only joke I know in Portugese is this one:
A rabbi, a Priest and a Muslim Cleric walk into a bar mitzvah,

and the bartender asks if they brought their Hippopotomus. 

 

A única piada que conheço em português é essa:
Um rabino, um padre e um clérigo muçulmano entram em um bar mitzvah,

e o garçom pergunta se trouxeram seu hipopótamo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,367

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.6k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,648
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Miracle Pete
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.