Jump to content
The World News Media

Amante del Amor

admin

By admin
in Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

admin Community Regular

admin

Posted
Posted

I love the comparison of the metaphors juxtaposed with the varied melody which goes from slow crescendo to a full out passionate climax back into a slow almost nostalgic melancholy.

Well done composer and singer!!

One of my favorite songs of all time.

 

"Amante Del Amor"
 

Mi prisión, mi libertad
mi obscuridad y mi lucero
mezcla de brisa y tempestad
así te quiero
mi pasión, mi corazón
lluvia de mayo, sol de invierno
que me estás dando, que tendrás
tal vez encanto, veneno
amante del amor
quisiera ser la enredadera
que sube por tu piel de seda
beberme tu pasión
amarte entera
amante del amor
mi placer, mi dolor
mi sensatez y mi locura
lo has sido todo para mí
amor violento, ternura
amante del amor
quisiera ser la enredadera
que sube por tu piel de seda
beberme tu pasión
amarte entera
amante del amor
a fuego lento yo te
quisiera amar
amante del amor
quiero quererte
dulcemente
y beso a beso hasta vencerte
muy poco a poco
profundamente
amante del amor

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Views 1.2k
  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

admin

I love the comparison of the metaphors juxtaposed with the varied melody which goes from slow crescendo to a full out passionate climax back into a slow almost nostalgic melancholy. Well done com

Queen Esther

Luis Miguel DVD Sevilla 1992 Amante del amor HQ  AMANTE DEL AMOR :  Luis Miguel Hermosa canción de amor ... Lo escuché por primera vez en 2011 y estaba atrapado, si...  ❤♥☼♥❤

Queen Esther

Luis Miguel - "Tengo Todo Excepto A Ti" (Video Oficial) Warner Music México 3 Mio. Abonnenten "Tengo Todo Excepto A Ti" Se ve que no te voy Se ve que no me vas Se ve que en realidad

  • Member
Queen Esther Newbie

Queen Esther

Posted
  • Member
Posted

I'm speechless, to hear one of my fav. songs just here.... I watch always another video version, but the song is really phenomenal ! Its blowing my mind, yes. Mostly I hear it again and again... after a longer pause. Luis Miguel's voice is wonderful  ;o)  Thank you for the reminder ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...
  • Member
Queen Esther Newbie

Queen Esther

Posted
  • Member
Posted

Luis Miguel - "Tengo Todo Excepto A Ti" (Video Oficial)

Warner Music México
3 Mio. Abonnenten
"Tengo Todo Excepto A Ti"

Se ve que no te voy
Se ve que no me vas
Se ve que en realidad
Solo me quieres
Como a un amigo más
Como algo de siempre.

Ya ves, me equivoqué
Creía que era feliz
Pensaba que yo lo tenía todo
Tantos amigos, caprichos
Amores locos.

Tengo todo excepto a ti
Y el sabor de tu piel
Bella como el sol de abril
Que absurdo el día en que soñé
Que eras para mí.
Tengo todo excepto a ti
Y la humedad de tu cuerpo
Tu me hecho porque sí
Seguir las huellas de tu olor
Loco por tu amor.

Se ve que no te voy
Se ve que no me vas
Pues tengo todo
Menos tu mirada
Y sin tus ojos
Mis ojos ya no ven nada.

Tengo todo excepto a ti
Y el sabor de tu piel
Bella como el sol de abril
Que absurdo el día en que soñé
Que eras para mí.

Me sobra juventud
Me muero por vivir
Pero me faltas tu.

Tengo todo excepto a ti
Y la humedad de tu cuerpo
Tu me has hecho por que si
Seguir las huellas de tu olor
Loco por tu amor.   ( enjoy )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Pudgy
      A Proclamation on Transgender Day of Visibility, 2024

      By Pudgy · Posted

      … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • Mic Drop
      The Ethereum Cryptocurrency Scam

      By Mic Drop · Posted

    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • BTK59
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By BTK59 · Posted

      Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • George88
      Can secular chronology be trusted?

      By George88 · Posted

      I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  

  • Members

    • misette

      misette 213

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,411

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592
    Techredirector
    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.