Jump to content
The World News Media

Marriott claims up to 500 million guests had their records hacked


TheWorldNewsOrg

Recommended Posts


  • Views 1.2k
  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Member

Marriott (-5.59%) execs woke up Friday morning, meditated for an hour, and then unleashed the bad news: personal info on up to 500 million guests in its Starwood reservation system may have been exposed in a hack. 

For about 65% of those guests, the compromised personal info could include name, mailing address, phone number, email address, passport number, DOB, and even encrypted credit card numbers.

  • Marriott CEO Arne Sorenson's mea culpa: "We fell short of what our guests deserve and what we expect of ourselves. We are doing everything we can to support our guests, and using lessons learned to be better moving forward."

If 500 million sounds like a lot to you...

It is—and it's enough to earn Marriott a spot on the podium for the largest data breach ever (in terms of affected individuals).

  • Remember the earth-shattering Equifax hack last year? 148 million people were affected.
  • But the record holder by a long shot is Yahoo, which compromised 3 billion accounts in 2013. 

 

Starwood is the hotel company Marriott acquired in 2016 for $13.6 billion. And you've probably snagged a continental breakfast in the lobbies of some of its brands: Westin, Aloft, Sheraton, and others. 

By tacking on Starwood, Marriott became the world's largest hotel chain. It has over 6,700 properties in 130 countries and territories.

Next steps, for you and Marriott 

  1. Yesterday, Marriott began sending emails out to affected guests in the Starwood reservation database.
  2. It set up a website and a call center to handle your questions. Plus, it's giving guests the opportunity to enroll in an internet monitoring site free of charge for a year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Marriott (+5.97%) gave us more details about a November hack of its Starwood reservation database—one of the largest data breaches ever.

  • The good news: The hotel chain chopped the number of affected customers to an "upper limit" of 383 million, down from 500 million.
  • The bad news that kind of cancels out the good news: Hackers swiped about 5 million unencrypted passport numbers.

That amounts to a "potential foreign-intelligence gold mine," security analysts tell the WSJ. And who might be spearheading that foreign intelligence effort? Don't act too surprised, but the top suspect is China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.