Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
TheWorldNewsOrg

Ford is recalling an additional 950,000 vehicles worldwide to replace potentially defective Takata...

Topic Summary

Created

Last Reply

Replies

Views

TheWorldNewsOrg -
TheWorldNewsOrg -
1
47

Top Posters


Recommended Posts


Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By admin
      It's been abandoned since 1988, but today, we get a glimpse of its bright future: 
      Ford (+0.93%) bought the building in May, and it's announcing its ambitious plans in a celebration this morning. The company, which also bought up nearby properties, will eventually occupy 1.2 million sq ft in the station's neighborhood (called Corktown). The Corktown campus will be "an innovation hub for Ford's vision for the future of transportation."  Why we're watching the livestream: Detroit native Big Sean will be performing.  Bottom line: Michigan Central Station is more than a building—it's a symbol of Detroit's rise and fall...and current renaissance. For Ford to come in and open it again is a really exciting moment for the city.
    • Guest
      By Guest
      Ford (+0.17%) and Lyft are vying to become the next great duo in autonomous driving—think Ernie and Bert, Jordan and Rodman, Trump and Twitter. 
      The two will manufacture self-driving vehicles for Lyft’s ride-hailing biz. And it shouldn’t come as a shock. Lyft has been on cruise-control trying to hone this technology. It’s partnered with Waymo and two smaller startups (Drive and NuTonomy), while beginning to develop its own in-house solutions. 
      So why all the intermingling? Consider what both parties stand to gain: 
      As Lyft and Uber head towards profitability, they’ll look to cut drivers out of the equation. That’s why they need partnerships with self-driving tech companies and car manufacturers. The Fords of the world can make the cars, but they don’t have the distribution Lyft and Uber offer. If they want to be the first ones on the road, they need to work arm-in-arm with ride-hailers. Expect more partnerships to come.
  • Forum Statistics

    61,662
    Total Topics
    114,372
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    16,503
    Total Members
    1,592
    Most Online
    Guticolu
    Newest Member
    Guticolu
    Joined




  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks! If you go to listen and watch some other videos, you will also notice how she, Lara, going  complètement  with emotions through song while singing.   
    • ma nouvelle chanteuse française préférée
    • In the OT, there is a direct command, “Thou shalt not kill (murder)!” This command should contain God's view of human life, which emphasizes that life is holy, sacred before God, but also that people must have the same feeling about the lives of other people around them. By reading the Bible, which describes the events before and after the occurrence of this commandment, we can see that this commandment has no absolute power. Within the same set of legal provisions, there are other commandments that were binding on the Israelites, too. For example, commands like; "Don't steal, don't lie, don't commit fornication ...". These commandments should never have been ignored or mitigated by some extraordinary circumstances. The specificity of this commandment, "You shall not kill," is evident in the fact that it was not of valid, obligation for all men and for all circumstances. Powerful individuals in Israel sometimes making their own decisions to go on military campaigns against others (Israelis and non-Israelis) The law also justified killing for revenge. In some other places, God commands the death penalty against an individual. Also, the Bible describes that God instituted great actions that justified killing of other people. These were most often military actions aimed at killing soldiers of the enemy army, but also their families. The killings of these other tribes and people were justified on the basis of several facts: 1) they were not Israelis  2) they lived in territory that the Israel nation were to conquer for themselves, 3) they belonged to other religions. The execution of the death penalty for a crime still exists today in some societies and legal systems. Obviously, the death penalty decision is based on balance. The one who killed must be killed. But from some other biblical examples we have seen that murder is not the only crime punishable by death. The disobedient child was also sentenced to death. Different religious affiliations or different religious beliefs also led to the death penalty. Adultery was punished by death. From what we have described so far, we can see how the command, "shall not kill," had a stretched meaning. It is therefore necessary to look at religious practices that are not new but may draw some parallels in symbolism and meaning. As you may already guessed, it is about an act of symbolic "killing" that is carried out in such a way to exclude (disfellowship) another person from a particular social (religious) group in a specific way - by ignoring aka shunning. Shunning (this is about JW organization in particular) can be made because of two conclusions. The first conclusion is reached by an individual JW member who believes that another member of the congregation has wronged/sinned against the Bible and its principles to the extent that he / she personally presents a spiritual anomaly (in the form of a spiritual illness or threat) and decides to "label" particular person as inappropriate for him to have socializing contacts. He seeks to avoid contact and minimize any literal and spiritual communion. In second conclusion, the conviction of the inappropriateness of a member is made by the body of the elders. The judgment may be based on the morally inappropriate behavior of an individual member, or it may be that an individual no longer agrees with the ideological and organizational structure or with the theological solutions of the organization what made him/her as "hostile element". This is when a person is removed from congregational members aka "spiritually killed" in such a way to excommunicate (dfd) them (he,she) from the community and impose a ban on almost every contact with the dfd person. The ban has few variations and interpretations of how the shunning should be carried out. But the very core of such a demand not to contact the excluded person is evident from the widespread practice that JW members have consistently implemented - the excluded (dfd) is not even greeted with the simplest “Good afternoon” greeting (hallo) on the street. JW's want to be peaceful people who go to jail in some countries because not want even to carry weapon in mandatory military service. They don't want take self-defense courses even for protect themselves when attacked. But they are motivated to be active in using spiritual weapons and warfare against ex members who are in a disagreement with doctrinal issues. And "killing" them with shunning.   What are your thoughts?       
    • Absolutament incroyable!
  • Popular Now

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.