Jump to content
The World News Media

UN SERVICE IRRÉPROCHABLE


Guest

Recommended Posts

  • Guest

                                                                                                   UN SERVICE IRRÉPROCHABLE             

                                                                                                                                Image associée  

     
L’apôtre Paul dit : “ Je te demande... de garder le commandement, sans tache, irréprochable. ” (I Tim. 6:13, 14, Li). Il ressort du contexte que ce commandement, qui devait être gardé sans tache, englobe toute la vie chrétienne. Ce n’était pas seulement un commandement de prêcher. Il comprenait un entier dévouement à Dieu, la foi, l’amour, la persévérance, la douceur du caractère ; il exhortait à éviter la richesse et à rechercher la justice. Ce qui importe, ce n’est pas uniquement la manière dont nous prêchons et le nombre d’heures que nous consacrons à la prédication, mais c’est la façon dont nous nous conduisons tout le temps. Quelqu’un peut passer de nombreuses heures dans le service, prêcher, revisiter des intéressés, conduire des études bibliques et amener des gens aux réunions, les instruire même comme prédicateurs en les emmenant dans le champ, et cependant ne pas atteindre le but. Rappelez-vous les paroles de Paul citées plus haut : “ Je frappe mon corps à la face et le réduis en servitude, de peur qu’après avoir prêché à d’autres, je ne sois moi-même réprouvé. ” S’il n’avait pas triomphé de ses faiblesses charnelles, toute son activité n’aurait pas empêché qu’il fût désapprouvé. Il ne s’agit pas seulement d’observer le commandement, mais de le garder “ sans tache, irréprochable ”. 


Dans II Timothée 2:5 nous lisons (Jé) : “ De même, dans les épreuves sportives, ne reçoit la couronne que celui qui a lutté suivant les règles. ” Si nous désirons obtenir la vie dans le monde nouveau, nous devons observer les règles de notre mieux, aussi bien celles concernant notre instruction pour le ministère que celles relatives à la vie quotidienne. Si, malgré nos efforts sincères, nous commettons des fautes, nous demanderons à Jéhovah de nous pardonner et de nous faire miséricorde, ce qu’il fera. Nous manifestons ainsi notre résolution d’obéir et de vivre selon les règles théocratiques. Si nous violons sa loi parfaite par suite des faiblesses que nous avons héritées, Jéhovah fera preuve de patience, de compréhension et de miséricorde. Mais il désire que nous tentions un sincère effort, démontrant ainsi notre volonté de faire tout notre possible dans le monde nouveau. Si nous refusons d’essayer, ne nous imaginons pas que nous serons transformés miraculeusement quand Harmaguédon commencera. C’est maintenant le temps de notre épreuve, qui doit révéler quelle serait notre conduite dans le monde nouveau. Si nous nous sentons poussés à bavarder, à murmurer, à nous plaindre, ou à être orgueilleux, arrogants, égoïstes, ou à donner libre cours aux caprices de la chair — si nous nous laissons aller à toutes ces choses, nous y serions probablement portés dans le monde nouveau. Mais, si nous les combattons dès maintenant, nous les vaincrons complètement dans le monde nouveau. C’est pourquoi nous devons nous efforcer de vivre comme nous vivrons alors, en observant toutes les règles divines.w54 15/6

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 215
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.