Jump to content
The World News Media

World largest and strongest nuclear Icebreaker - 50 Years of Victory


TheWorldNewsOrg

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

  • Views 428
  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just another opinion here, but I can't see any connection. Breaking the ice with one of these nuclear powered ice-breakers touches such a minute fraction of the ice and does virtually nothing to the t

I'm guessing that this person is on the right track: https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/icelights/2012/04/are-icebreakers-changing-climate Meier decided to crunch some numbers and find out. While

Posted Images

Couldn't these guys (How many are there total?) be responsible for much of the article ice sheet destruction over the past 50 years?

If they keep destroying the ice "sheet" then how can it ever grow deep and strong.

I wonder if this is a bigger reason than too many cows farting somewhere in Iowa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

It's all a political agenda, and pseudo-religion by ignorant people that do not understand that everything we know about "Global Warming" is in about 25 computer models ... and people pick and choose the computer models that will generate the most grant money, and discard the others.

The Earth's climate is ALWAYS changing.

At one time the ENTIRE planet was covered in about two miles of ice.

(See the PBS documentary "Australia - the First 4 Billion Years")

The political agenda is all about MONEY!

The buying and selling, and brokerage fees for buying and selling "Carbon Credits" ...

dt001216.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 8/9/2019 at 9:14 AM, admin said:

Couldn't these guys (How many are there total?) be responsible for much of the article ice sheet destruction over the past 50 years?

If they keep destroying the ice "sheet" then how can it ever grow deep and strong.

Just another opinion here, but I can't see any connection. Breaking the ice with one of these nuclear powered ice-breakers touches such a minute fraction of the ice and does virtually nothing to the temperature of the water, or the ice.

Also, nuclear power is about the most efficient type of power for producing green energy with no additional greenhouse gases added to the atmosphere. Of course, due to a couple near disasters and real disasters (3 Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima) the "Green" crowd will usually fight against this form of "green" energy."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JW Insider What about all the "heat" that the ship produces to make such energy? it is dispersed up there in the arctic.

so in addition to the ice sheets being cut up into smaller sheets allowing for a much larger solar energy "edge" surface area by the hundreds of miles on each side of the ship....

The nuclear power (heat) of the ship itself radiates / elevates the overall heat up there...

And I think I read that Russia has a dozen or so of these things? The USA one or two? And what about all the other countries?

Maybe they are tearing it all to shreds? 

Maybe that is why it is disappearing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I'm guessing that this person is on the right track:

https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/icelights/2012/04/are-icebreakers-changing-climate

Meier decided to crunch some numbers and find out. While his numbers are an estimate, he said, they provide a helpful comparison of just how much icebreakers might contribute to summer ice loss. Meier said, “In late June, when the sun’s energy is strongest, the total sea ice extent is around 10 million square kilometers or 3.9 million square miles. An icebreaker cruising through the ice for 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) and leaving an ice-free wake of 10 meters (33 feet) would open an area of water 10 square kilometers (3.9 square miles) over the entire cruise. In contrast, the Arctic sea ice cover decreases by an average of over 9 million square kilometers or 3.5 million square miles each year during its melt season—an area larger than the contiguous United States.  In total, researchers estimate that the number of icebreakers traversing the Arctic at any given time is usually less than three. So, Meier said, “The actual contribution is miniscule—only one part in a million of the total ice cover.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

That is why you don't bleed to death from a mosquito bite.

... and you are too heavy to carry back to the breeding pond.

.... and when you look at an ocean covered in ice ... that's ONLY the top.

... there is a lot more underneath that.

... same thing.

When I was a boy, I got shot in the face several times with BB gun bbs, in BB gun battles.

You just push on one side and they pop right out.  Leaves a small pocket for about a day, then closes right up.

...same thing.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

It takes  any specific Icebreaker Ship the same amount of energy to push through and break up ice, whether you are using oil as fuel, coal as fuel, uranium as fuel, or 400 million hamsters on a wheel, turning the Icebreaker's engines.

To do work, energy needs to flow from a greater concentration to a dump, or it will not move anything.  The amount of waste energy in an Internal combustion Engine of any type is about 60% ... even in your car.  Turbines, which many ships have to have heat dumps, nuclear reactors ... and even hamsters sweat like crazy to get rid of heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,380

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Miracle Pete

      Miracle Pete 1

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,669
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Miracle Pete
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.