I know little specifically about any these characters, but I see the name Ann Omaly again. She is one of the three “apostates” from the original “TrueTom vs the Apostates” thread that got me into trouble when I asserted with some ad hominem detail that while were they managed to unite for a common cause, they probably would not be able to stand each other were they to meet in public.
Who is Ann? She is the inspiration for my reclusive @Top Cat O'Malighan character, but I still do not know who she is
OK, I agree that I must have sounded a bit anxious to get feedback from a blatant apostate. I remembered his disdain for all things sacred but forgot that you'll end up trapped in an inextricable whirlwind of words. If you try to get the last word, at least you will probably keep him around long enough to get some good material.
Funny that I see scholarJW's name pop up in the "who's online" box, and each time I think he might be ready with something new on 607/587 in which case, I always expect to learn something when he's challenged by persons like AlanF and Ann Omaly. I'm always anxious to learn, but I think I was too willing to overlook the way he treated you and Arauna last time.
Too bad you won't find any here 😁
Just as I have indicated. All talk no action. You and JWinsider can’t prove a thing, but are willing to sully the native to heighten JWinsider’s claim.
Show the proof or get a better job, you’re ego account is not too good as a ringer.
I will ask you to watch your profane language. Some of us can’t be as offensive as you without being cut-off by your supporter.
In order to have an intellectual debate, it would be better not to muddy the water by you or your kind of baseless opposers. Using your term, Opposer buddies.
Aside from that, no! Some of your English grammar is not compatible to Spanish language. You’re assuming too much. There is a difference with Spanish dialects and the Spanish language. From Spain, Argentina, Chile, Brazil to Mexico etc. Trying learning, how to be properly, objective.
Therefore, there is no need to debate grammar that some of you do, with your own poor grammar usage.
Coming from a righteous man. That's what scripture indicates, not from an unrighteous man, that's what scripture indicates. So no, scripture doesn't support your words.
César Chávez said:
I've said several times now: I do not have proof of these things; I have evidence.
If I had proof, a number of Watchtower officials would be in jail.
WTF are you talking about?
She lost because the Tennessee judges were too cowardly to make a ruling that would adversely impact the power of their own religions in the Bible Belt.
The Watchtower Society directed the local elders to disfellowship her, contrary to the Society's stated policy, and that's why she sued the WTS.
He gave me the same kind of information he gives your Governing Body.
Already done, since I know enough facts to be certain of what I've said.
We will note that you have no contrary information.
No, what I'm saying is that you and your JW buddies are so twisted by your cult that you'll believe your cult leaders over even the one you claim to follow.
And here I thought that you had a measure of intelligence.
I made no mistakes. You copy/pasted wrong and somehow dropped the 's' on the end of "apologists". You can't even read now.
Except that I told you quite clearly that I don't hold with evolutionary psychology, so that all your dumbly critical nonsense was for naught. You refused to accept that.
What you continue confirming is what I've told you before: you're among the dumbest posters I've run across, having little intelligence or reading comprehension. Your responses are usually for the straw men that inhabit your brain, as with your above invention.