I have no idea who she really is, but she is a name known from the big exJW forum (Simon something-or-other) and I have seen the name on a private yahoo forum run by Witnesses where I have discussed chronology. I haven't checked it in a couple of years, but it has included some Rolf Furuli defenders. (Furuli is a JW with a PhD who has tried to make the Watchtower chronology seem possible. No one outside of a few Watchtower defenders have ever taken him seriously.)
It is because you are looking for dogma or new rules or something like that. Not looking for the right stuff....... one can see and still be blind to something in front of you..
Truths are being refined to get us through Armageddon right now.........we are shedding the unnecessary stuff and weight and 'growing' in support and care of each other. As I said...... you are looking for the answers that can suit your agenda.
9 What shall we conclude then? Do we have any advantage? Not at all! For we have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under the power of sin. 10 As it is written:
“There is no one righteous, not even one; 11 there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God. -- Rom 3
20 Surely there is no righteous man on earth who does good and never sins. --- Eccl 7
Do you know who is "righteous man"? Do you have unmistakable "nose" for that? :)) Or, Pinocchio effect is visible when "unrighteous individual lies to you"?
By this cited verses i really don't know WHAT sort of people you see as "righteous" and whose words you see as trustful. Jews and Gentiles, Jehovah's Witnesses and non JW's ...all are unrighteous human.
Even those who made efforts to be "righteous" (many times only in their own eyes) sins commonly, most often in words.
I know little specifically about any these characters, but I see the name Ann Omaly again. She is one of the three “apostates” from the original “TrueTom vs the Apostates” thread that got me into trouble when I asserted with some ad hominem detail that while were they managed to unite for a common cause, they probably would not be able to stand each other were they to meet in public.
Who is Ann? She is the inspiration for my reclusive @Top Cat O'Malighan character, but I still do not know who she is
OK, I agree that I must have sounded a bit anxious to get feedback from a blatant apostate. I remembered his disdain for all things sacred but forgot that you'll end up trapped in an inextricable whirlwind of words. If you try to get the last word, at least you will probably keep him around long enough to get some good material.
Funny that I see scholarJW's name pop up in the "who's online" box, and each time I think he might be ready with something new on 607/587 in which case, I always expect to learn something when he's challenged by persons like AlanF and Ann Omaly. I'm always anxious to learn, but I think I was too willing to overlook the way he treated you and Arauna last time.
Too bad you won't find any here 😁
Just as I have indicated. All talk no action. You and JWinsider can’t prove a thing, but are willing to sully the native to heighten JWinsider’s claim.
Show the proof or get a better job, you’re ego account is not too good as a ringer.
I will ask you to watch your profane language. Some of us can’t be as offensive as you without being cut-off by your supporter.
In order to have an intellectual debate, it would be better not to muddy the water by you or your kind of baseless opposers. Using your term, Opposer buddies.
Aside from that, no! Some of your English grammar is not compatible to Spanish language. You’re assuming too much. There is a difference with Spanish dialects and the Spanish language. From Spain, Argentina, Chile, Brazil to Mexico etc. Trying learning, how to be properly, objective.
Therefore, there is no need to debate grammar that some of you do, with your own poor grammar usage.
Coming from a righteous man. That's what scripture indicates, not from an unrighteous man, that's what scripture indicates. So no, scripture doesn't support your words.