Creation-Evolution-Creative Days-Age of the Earth-Humanoid Fossils-Great Flood

[Patiently waiting for Truth]

10 hours ago, Ann O'Maly said:

It all sounds a little 'gnostic,' 4Jah2me. Do you believe the 'true anointed remnant' have a dual nature, i.e. they are spirits inhabiting a physical body? Does this mean the 'true anointed remnant' cannot err in matters of interpretation or doctrine?

Gnostic. This is exactly what I'm saying. you are relating it to something. Being a physical person you need to relate everything to something else.  Please think outside of all the boxes.

Yes the True Anointed have a duel nature of types..  You probs' don't want scripture but it shows my point.

Romans 7 : 21 through 25

I find, then, this law in my case: When I wish to do what is right, what is bad is presentith me.v ²²  I really delight in the law of God according to the man I am within, ²³  but I see in my body another law warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive to sin’s lawy that is in my body. ²⁴  Miserable man that I am! Who will rescue me from the body undergoing this death? ²⁵  Thanks to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So, then, with my mind I myself am a slave to God’s law, but with my flesh to sin’s law.

So I agree on the idea of a duel nature, but not so much that thye are spirits in human bodies. Maybe i mean duel personalities.

However, this is where I am trying to go beyond what I am suppose to understand.  I am not annointed, so not entitled to know. 

It does mean that the True Annointed WOULD NOT ERR in matters of interpretation or doctrine. Hence it shows that the GB / helpers / Watchtower / et al, are not of the True Anointed. 

Why would God annoint a person then feed that person lies ?  It's complete contradiction.  God and Christ might hold back information until a chosen time, but not feed false information to the anointed.

Another thought. Why would they be annointed early on, if they were not going to be used NOW ? 

Why wouldn't God just watch them through their lives and then annoint them upon their death when they had proven worthy ? 

[Arauna]

On 1/18/2021 at 10:06 PM, AlanF said:

Creationist nonsense.

More evolution " thumbsuck". 

[Arauna]

On 1/18/2021 at 8:38 PM, AlanF said:

understand that situation, mutations played little or no part in it. Rather, natural genetic variations -- not mutations -- were selected by environmental conditions.

Lol.  Do you 7nderstand what you are saying?  That is the problem with evolutionists.... they don't think things through.

If I have a windows code to operate my computer and I suddenly develop a few "variations"  in the code or a few mutations.......... I will have to get the trouble shooter in to find the "variation"  so he can get the computer to run again.

Genetic code is a more complex operating system than a windows system.   

[Arauna]

On 1/18/2021 at 8:31 PM, Ann O'Maly said:

that to the finches on Daphne Major!

Darwins finches had "adaption" of their beaks when the food source changed and changed back again when the food source changed back......... they were still finches. They did not change into eagles. 

[Arauna]

On 1/18/2021 at 8:30 PM, AlanF said:

True, but you're missing the point: Natural selection and such filter out the bad ones, leaving only what work

Wishful thinking m'dear....... the million years it would take to sort that out would see the end of the specie...... 

[AlanF]

1 hour ago, Arauna said:

More evolution " thumbsuck". 

You're infantile even for a young-earth creationist JW.

[AlanF]

53 minutes ago, Arauna said:

Lol.  Do you 7nderstand what you are saying?  That is the problem with evolutionists.... they don't think things through.

If I have a windows code to operate my computer and I suddenly develop a few "variations"  in the code or a few mutations.......... I will have to get the trouble shooter in to find the "variation"  so he can get the computer to run again.

Genetic code is a more complex operating system than a windows system.   

Apparently you're too stupid to understand the video I gave you to watch.

[AlanF]

48 minutes ago, Arauna said:

Wishful thinking m'dear....... the million years it would take to sort that out would see the end of the specie...... 

The fossil record says you're wrong.

[TrueTomHarley]

21 hours ago, Ann O'Maly said:

It all sounds a little 'gnostic,' 4Jah2me. Do you believe the 'true anointed remnant' have a dual nature,

Think Santa Claus

[Patiently waiting for Truth]

9 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

Think Santa Claus

You have no idea at all tom. 

9 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

On 1/19/2021 at 10:01 AM, Ann O'Maly said:

It all sounds a little 'gnostic,' 4Jah2me. Do you believe the 'true anointed remnant' have a dual nature,

2 Peter 1 : 13 & 14  NWT. 

 But I consider it right, as long as I am in this tabernacle, to stir you with reminders, ¹⁴  knowing as I do that my tabernacle is soon to be removed, just as also our Lord Jesus Christ made clear to me.

Berean Study Bible
I think it is right to refresh your memory as long as I live in the tent of my body, because I know that this tent will soon be laid aside, as our Lord Jesus Christ has made clear to me.

@Ann O'Maly Please ignore Tom, he's an empty vessel that makes more noise. 

I hope you can see here that the apostle Peter is saying he is not just human. He is saying that his body is only a tent or tabernacle, a covering, a human life encasing a spiritual one. Peter was awaiting the time for this 'outer covering' to be removed. 

[Arauna]

2 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

Think Santa Claus

Reminds me of the "goldilocks epochs" when there were no natural disasters for millions of years so that the "soup" was stable for the millions of mutations to lead to beneficial selections. Hitting the jackpot every time. 

[Ann O'Maly]

22 hours ago, 4Jah2me said:

So I agree on the idea of a duel nature, but not so much that thye are spirits in human bodies. Maybe i mean duel personalities.

So they are humans. Men and women.

22 hours ago, 4Jah2me said:

It does mean that the True Annointed WOULD NOT ERR in matters of interpretation or doctrine.

How would you know?