Jump to content

First day of campaign, south congregation, Portuguese ospino. Venezuela.
 

First day of campaign, south congregation, Portuguese ospino. Venezuela.


Photo Information for First day of campaign, south congregation, Portuguese ospino. Venezuela.


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

  • Similar Content

    • Guest
      By Guest
      No importa lo que suceda, confiamos en Jehová y en su protección amorosa mientras le servimos de la mejor manera. Muchas gracias por sus constantes oraciones, sepan que los amamos también y qué oramos también por ustedes. Amor Ágape! Compartido por @duglesd96
    • Guest
    • Guest Nicole SG
      By Guest Nicole SG
      Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaidó declared himself the country's interim president amid nationwide protests Wednesday, in a bid to seize power from sitting leader Nicolás Maduro.
      The U.S. swiftly proclaimed its support for Guaidó. Maduro responded by announcing a break in diplomatic relations with Washington.
      Guaidó, the 35-year-old recently elected head of Venezuela's National Assembly, took the oath of office on an outdoor podium in Caracas, flanked by yellow, blue and red Venezuelan flags. He raised his right hand as a crowd erupted in cheers. He promised to serve as interim leader and call for general elections.
      Read more: https://www.npr.org/2019/01/23/687643405/anti-maduro-protesters-march-in-cities-across-venezuela

    • Guest Nicole
      By Guest Nicole
      Desde que está al aire hace dos años JW Broadcasting, es visitada mensualmente por 10 millones de personas.
       
      Los testigos de Jehová tienen dos récords mundiales: La página web más traducida del mundo, Jw.org en 750 idiomas, y La Atalaya, la revista de mayor tiraje mundial (42 millones de ejemplares mensuales), seguida de la Despertad (41 millones/mes).
      Desde aquel lejano 1879 cuando nació revista La Torre del Vigía, conocida después como La Atalaya, hasta la sorprendente Broadcasting o la página web en 750 idiomas, los testigos de Jehová obedeciendo el mandato bíblico de “predicar las buenas nuevas del Reino…”, han utilizado todos los medios tecnológicos disponibles.
      En esta nota no nos ocuparemos de temas doctrinales. Simplemente relataremos cómo esta organización ha adaptado la tecnología del siglo XXI a su propósito.
      Su interés se centra en quienes asistentes a las reuniones de congregación, asambleas regionales o internacionales o participan de la “Noche de adoración en familia”, pero principalmente a la predicación de casa en casa o en corredores comerciales, como agentes de publicidad del Reino, columna vertebral de su mensaje.
      El 24 de febrero de 1924, cuando empezaban las primeras transmisiones radiales, la sociedad Watch Tower inauguró su propia emisora.
      A principios de los 80, testigos ingenieros electrónicos japoneses, crearon en Brooklin el Sistema Electrónico de Edición Plurilingue, (MEPS), por sus siglas en ingles, para traducir las publicaciones simultáneamente en 186 idiomas.
      Fue de gran ayuda al recomponerse el mapa geopolítico europeo con la caída del Muro de Berlín, seguida de “la cortina de hierro” con sus países asociados y abrirse una puerta inmensa de predicación donde su obra estaba proscrita.
      Con el avance de la ciencia y la tecnología del siglo XXI, se hizo una reingeniería a la forma de llegar a una creciente población mundial, de 8.000 millones de personas, cada vez más ávidas y sedientas de explicaciones, y perpleja por los acontecimientos mundiales que enmudecen al planeta diariamente.
      En 2014 los testigos presentaron JW Language, una aplicación gratuita que ayuda a explicar en diversos idiomas lo que enseña la Biblia.
      El 6 de octubre de 2014 se lanzó experimentalmente el canal de televisión por internet JW Broadcastin, inicialmente en ingles. Desde agosto de 2015 está disponible en 70 idiomas.
      En condiciones normales, montar un estudio de televisión climatizado, con equipos de audio y video, estudios, sets, producción, grabación, redactar guiones, escenificaciones, producir videos y aprender manejo de cámaras, tarda dos años. Los testigos lo lograron en dos meses.
      Los TJ son un ejercito de más de 8 millones de personas reconocidas mundialmente por predicar en más de 230 países. Con ese contingente cubren palmo a palmo todos los rincones de la tierra.
      Ahora, además de hacer visitas en las casas, desde hace más de un año emplean exhibidores portátiles, mesas y kioskos.
      Solo se entra en contacto con los transeúntes si estos plantean una pregunta o inquietud.
      También, parte de lo publicado en 137 años esta sistematizado, comprimido y disponible en el sitio web JW Library y JW Biblioteca Virtual.
      En las reuniones de congregación y en la predicación se agiliza la búsqueda de textos bíblicos o videos, en tablets y equipos móviles.
      Las Asambleas son amenas reuniones instructivas donde se enseña con representaciones video grabadas, proyectadas en gigantescos video Beams, como en los dos auditorios del Salón de Asambleas de Galapa donde pueden acomodarse 4.000 personas.
      La Atalaya redujo su paginaje y tiene dos ediciones mensuales, una que se coloca públicamente y otra exclusivamente de estudio semanal en las congregaciones.
      Despertad ahora se edita mensualmente y se distribuyen 12 revistas anuales.
      Con 137 años de circulacion global, la Atalaya ha tenido tal acogida que hace algunos años una multinacional de refrescos, sodas o gaseosas como decimos en Colombia, propuso financiar un aviso que copara la contraportada.
      Por supuesto, la oferta fue desestimada.
       
      http://www.ruedalaeconomia.com/tecnologia/el-asombroso-salto-tecnologico-de-los-testigos-de-jehova/
    • Guest Nicole
    • By El Bibliotecario
      Testigo de Jehová le predica al Presidente Chavez - YouTube.webm
    • By El Bibliotecario
      A pesar de la crisis económica, los testigos de Jehová se mantienen espiritualmente activos en Venezuela.
      Fuente
    • By The Librarian
      Despite the ongoing economic crisis in Venezuela, Jehovah’s Witnesses in the country remain active in their spiritual activities.
      Source
    • By El Bibliotecario
      Buen día Hernano ,estos son algunos msjs ,(Hola mi Hna, estamos bien gracias a Jehová.. En la congregación bien, aunque la ciudad esta en alerta roja por lo del río..)( si, ya evacuaron a algunos hnos de la lorena y mereyal en los coquitos.. La sucursal organizo un comité de socorro.. Los hnos de pto Ayacucho están en refugios, porque allá la inundacion pasa los 2mts de desborde.. Hay 5 estados en alerta roja..)
      Ayer se nos dijo que hay que estar preparados y también la congregación se esta organizando para prestar ayuda a nuestros hnos damnificados..
      Esto es en el estado donde vive la hermana Yajaira .
      Hermano se acuerda de la medicina que envíe ? Bueno todavía esta en Cúcuta no la an podido pasar y el envió de hay a donde se debe enviar es muy costoso .
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    61,556
    Total Topics
    113,290
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    16,484
    Total Members
    1,592
    Most Online
    César Chávez
    Newest Member
    César Chávez
    Joined




  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And, as I remember, the Colonists thought the British Interpretation of how things should be handled that was an onerous burden to them ... sufficient enough to go to war against the mightiest  army and navy of that time period.
    • Per Wikipedia, The Constitution says: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." When the Constitution was written, the terms "high crime" and "misdemeanor" were both used in senses that are quite different from the way we've come to think of them today. The original sense came from the laws that the framers had themselves been under, the British laws, which had used the term since as far back as 1386. It was originally a phrase to highlight the fact that almost any kind of "maladministration" --even things we might think of as NON-crimes-- could have a magnified effect due to the "high office" of the official, judge, president, etc. Most of the items that were considered "maladministration" would not be considered much of a problem at all if you or I practiced them. But they could become a perverting of justice or subject the populace to the ill effects in a way that only a person in high office had the ability to do. When James Madison discussed the formulation of the "constitution" with Mason, they started out with only Bribery and Treason, but Mason argued that the definition of Treason is too narrowly tied to enemies when at war, and that this would hardly cover situations when a president "attempts to subvert the Constitution." So the British term "maladministration" was suggested and then, after discussion, changed it to the more formal British term "high crimes and misdemeanors." According to the Wikipedia article on "Maladministration"  it means the following in UK law: The definition of maladministration is wide and can include: Delay Incorrect action or failure to take any action Failure to follow procedures or the law Failure to provide information Inadequate record-keeping Failure to investigate Failure to reply Misleading or inaccurate statements Inadequate liaison Inadequate consultation Broken promises That's such a vague definition that Madison said it would be the equivalent of just having a President who served at the pleasure of the Senate. It would "normalize" impeachment, and therefore the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" was deemed closer to the idea of "subverting the constitution." The phrase was definitely intended to narrow the reasons that the Senate might try to impeach a President, but was also a way to include things that would not nearly reach up to the definitions of bribery and treason. In Britain the phrase meant abuse of a high office even if the abuse did NOT violate any criminal laws. So this is how legal scholars have also applied it to the US presidency, usually with a focus on any subversion of the Constitution. The Wiki article on "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" includes the following that gives an idea of how the original framers understood it: Benjamin Franklin asserted that the power of impeachment and removal was necessary for those times when the Executive "rendered himself obnoxious," and the Constitution should provide for the "regular punishment of the Executive when his conduct should deserve it, and for his honorable acquittal when he should be unjustly accused." James Madison said that "impeachment... was indispensable" to defend the community against "the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of the chief Magistrate." With a single executive, Madison argued, unlike a legislature whose collective nature provided security, "loss of capacity or corruption was more within the compass of probable events, and either of them might be fatal to the Republic."[10] The process of impeaching someone in the House of Representatives and the Senate is difficult, made so to be the balance against efforts to easily remove people from office for minor reasons that could easily be determined by the standard of "high crimes and misdemeanors". It was George Mason who offered up the term "high crimes and misdemeanors" as one of the criteria to remove public officials who abuse their office. Their original intentions can be gleaned by the phrases and words that were proposed before, such as "high misdemeanor," "maladministration," or "other crime." Edmund Randolph said impeachment should be reserved for those who "misbehave." Charles Cotesworth Pinckney said, It should be reserved "for those who behave amiss, or betray their public trust." As can be seen from all these references to "high crimes and misdemeanors," the definition or its rationale does not relate to specific offences. This gives a lot of freedom of interpretation to the House of Representatives and the Senate. The constitutional law by nature is not concerned with being specific. The courts through precedence and the legislature through lawmaking make constitutional provisions specific. In this case the legislature (the House of Representatives and the Senate) acts as a court and can create a precedent. In Federalist No. 65, Alexander Hamilton said, "those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."[11] The first impeachment conviction by the United States Senate was in 1804 of John Pickering, a judge of the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, for chronic intoxication. Federal judges have been impeached and removed from office for tax evasion, conspiracy to solicit a bribe, and making false statements to a grand jury.[12]
    • France is in shambles right now. To this day the Yellow Vest still march, and as even stated before, which turns out to be true, protests everywhere, in and outside of France. The Americans will get quite the treat in a few weeks, this I am sure of due to the ongoing chaos we see now.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.