All Activity

Satan as Lucifer was supposed to teach humanity about God, and other stuff, and from the time of his creation by Jesus as Michael sometime after the Big Bang, told the truth. That’s why he was there in the Garden of Eden. This is how simple things become when TRUTH IS YOUR GOAL, and not your AGENDA … and you ask the right questions. The right answers JUMP OUT AT YOU!

You asked a good question. As far as I know from the Bible, no angel ever sounded the alarm. Were angels not present during the conversation between Satan and Eve? If they didn't, then nobody knew what was going on. If one of them listened to it and did not react, then one must ask why? Yes, since Satan initiated the process of deception, it stands to reason that all his words thereafter become suspect. However, this does not prove that he was not telling the truth before that unfortunate event. It also doesn't prove that he can't decide to start telling the truth. Because you yourself say that it's all a matter of choice.

samo, samo malice and hatefulness on parade.

Pudgy, I see that you prefer to focus on semantics rather than addressing the actual question. It is often the case that individuals lacking intelligence resort to deflecting blame. But it would be you if you didn't. That's why you are tainted, and I am not in the eyes of God, and to the public that judged you.

Hmmmmm?

What’s the difference between THAT and you trying to be the Vicar of Warwick?

Keep in mind that God granted angels the same free will as humanity. However, Satan chose to assert himself as God, despite not being so, @Srecko Sostar

THAT avoids a mountain of misleading and obfuscating crap designed to impugn my simple straightforward Pastor Russel quote. No. One word. ONE WORD completely answers the one sentence question !!! (… anyone can easily see how simple this all COULD have been, Georgie)

Do you think that if the angels were aware of Satan's intentions to deceive mankind in the Garden of Eden, they would not have raised an alarm? From the very moment Satan made the choice to deceive Eve, he began a path of constant deception. What sets this apart from the previously asked question? It essentially boils down to the same matter.

What makes it any different to you? It's like asking if Satan, the father of all lies, is capable of telling the truth. You're looking at wording rather than action. Humanity was granted a capacity or ability by Satan, which is now resulting in a consequence. However, how can we ignore this fact in order to justify its rationality?

It can also be like this: "When did Satan start lying?" "Did the angel known by the name Satan ever speak the truth?"

"Does Satan always tell, speak the truth?"

Your reading comprehension skills approach ZERO. I did not ask you a question They were rhetorical. The “NO” answer, provided by me establishes that.

Considering that you continually ponder this question every time your reflection meets your eyes, it is only fair to assume that you should possess the knowledge to counteract your malevolent tendencies. It is worth recalling that I once extended an invitation to you to manifest civility, yet you opted for your customary bestial conduct. This implies that rational discourse is utterly futile when engaging with an egotistical, self-absorbed delinquent. Yet, you want me to respond to your ridiculous question, which is a complete joke. The good thing, the public knows. Go ahead, let it all out. You will forever remain insignificant and pitiful, as that is how you choose to treat others, not just your chosen group of apostate friends here.

Here’s a good question. Why should I get involved in the mad ramblings of a malicious evil person for his purposes, to defend a position or point I have not personally advanced? I see no reason to do so, and I don’t. If i did it would only be as a courtesy to you, because of your reasonableness, or graciousness, or because I liked you, or I thought it would contribute to a discussion i was interested in. Since none of those prerequisites exist … you can have a stroke on your own schedule. Here is another good question. Do you think any sane, reasonable person, after reading these “discussions” would be attracted to the Theocracy you claim to represent? NO.

Who granted us such extraordinary ability, God or Satan? Remember, let's not pay attention to that loser that can't answer a simple question. He simply revealed to the public his true low character. That's as simplest as it gets Srecko, an intelligent 6-year-old, understands consequences. Adam and Eve comprehended it, Jesus comprehended it, and he instilled the apostles with that understanding. Through scripture, we also understand it, genuine Christians who are not ignorant, disfellowshipped, or mentally ill. Even those individuals should grasp it, especially when secular law takes action against evil, Satanic acts. How should the question be formulated in order to receive a clear and coherent response from you?

Thank you so much for the study material.

Naw … that doesn’t work. If he doesn’t get his demented preconceived answer he has a fit.

Every intelligent creature created by God with free will is capable of telling truths and lies. What is unclear about that? Or what in that conclusion is contrary to the words of Jesus? Perhaps, if you want a different answer, you should ask a more adequate, more accurate question.

now what?

If you can't recall the passage @Srecko Sostar, it can be found in Matthew 4. The question arises, did Jesus comprehend that Satan was speaking lies or was he deceiving Jesus with a partial truth? One would assume that people would understand that the Earth and all of its kingdoms ultimately belong to God. Satan is merely the current caretaker. Therefore, could he truly give away something that he only has temporary possession of? Furthermore, if Jesus had accepted ownership of something that did not belong to Satan in the first place, what would have been the outcome for both Christ and Satan in the eyes of God? It's a matter worth considering. Think about it carefully and don't focus on your puppet master pudgy.

Somehow, I was certain that you would appear and manipulate individual words to convey agreement. You never fail to deliver. How can you convince a rational individual that the words spoken by the father of deception can be truthful without Satan resorting to trickery? How can you effectively challenge the teachings of Christ, a contradiction that is necessary to gain acceptance from your specific audience? Take control of the ball as it now rests on your side of the court. By the way, I'd like to share an example from John 8:44 that I find intriguing. There's a particular phrase that caught my attention: "for there is no truth in him." So, question the teachings of Christ. Recall the advice that Jesus gave to Satan to assist you.

Can Satan speak the truth? By George88 6 hours ago in Topics https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can can 1 of 5 verb (1) kən, ˈkan also ˈken; dialectal ˈkin past could kəd, ˈku̇d ; present singular & plural can Synonyms of can auxiliary verb 1 a: be physically or mentally able to He can lift 200 pounds. b: know how to She can read. c—used to indicate possibility Do you think he can still be alive? Those things can happen. —sometimes used interchangeably with may d: be inherently able or designed to everything that money can buy e: be enabled by law, agreement, or custom to Congress can declare war. f: be permitted by conscience or feeling to can hardly blame her g: be made possible or probable by circumstances to He can hardly have meant that. h: be logically or axiologically able to 2 + 2 can also be written 3 + 1. 2 : have permission to —used interchangeably with may You can go now if you like. transitive verb 1 archaic : to be able to do, make, or accomplish 2 obsolete : KNOW, UNDERSTAND Answer: YES

You know, I almost believe a wooden stake through your heart would not stop you.