Jump to content
The World News Media

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I can honestly say in my 77 years on this Earth I have never run across such a whiney, self-centered arrogant personality as yours BTK59. Perhaps it’s a good idea you don’t tell us more about yourself. It might erode the image of yourself you have so carefully cultivated here.
  3. Well, this depends on how you view repentance. Why would anyone want to associate with such a negative person who is a hardcore apostate with evil intentions and no chance of redemption? Indeed, there is no thesis involved, only the application of common sense. God's people need to understand the scheme of things, but apostates do not.
  4. I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. It is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes. Can you tell me about Allen Smith and why you added that person? Were you responsible for ejecting that individual from the forum, as a biased hypocrite? Do not pretend to be sympathetic when you are aware that God sees your actions and behavior, JWI So, when I get kicked out, delete all my posts, Tom, JWI.
  5. Politics, optics, and money. Politics, optics, and money. … and whenever you think something else is involved, it’s Politics, optics, and money.
  6. I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  7. Massimo Introvigne is a lobbyist for WTJWorg. So it's interesting to hear how an ex-JW from Norway comments on this lobbyist that WTJWorg likes to use for its defense. The most interesting is the new thesis of GB in which it creates a categorization of former members. According to their latest instruction, you can greet a former member (but only to a limited extent, without socialization) who wants to come to a meeting in KH. But another "type", labeled as "apostate" of ex-JW should not be welcomed. So, GB sinks deeper and deeper into their instructions that "make sense only from their point of view", while ordinary JWs mostly cannot understand them, but are obliged to obey, because these are the "last days".
  8. Today
  9. … a good, common sense solution. The time has already been wasted and is gone, and … uh …
  10. @BTK59 ( @George88 ) ( @BillyTheKid-55 ) ( @Allen Smith ) ( @AllenSmith35 ), etc., etc., etc., etc. -- and @Pudgy ( @James Thomas Rook Jr. ), I once got in trouble from an Admin here for revealing that @TrueTomHarley was from Rochester, based on the assumption that I had used a moderator's ability to read I.P. addresses. I got out of trouble by showing that TTH had himself made posts claiming he was from Rochester. It is considered very bad forum etiquette to reveal information or attempt to reveal personal information about a forum participant that isn't something they bring up about themselves. If it is specifically to reveal something negative, it is clearly malicious. Because it also goes against the rules of the forum, BTK59 and his cohorts might end up getting banned. I don't want to see BTK banned, for all the reasons I've stated before: Banning is meaningless on a forum like this one, because anyone can come back under a different name. Banning is a form of shunning, which can have serious and unintended psychological consequences. Banning can involve erasing all of a person's writing here, into which they may have put a lot of time and research. Banning a person who shows signs of maliciousness and viciousness and paranoia usually will motivate the person to come back only to seek vengeance on everyone they think was involved in their "excommunication" or "disfellowshipping" from the forum. In practice that has meant attacks on persons who were not even interested in the matter. So, for these reasons, I recommend the following so that BTK and cohorts are not banned. I recommend that the posts related to the malicious attempt to expose personal legal issues and troubles be removed. I will remove all related posts within 24 hours, unless both parties to this matter request that they remain.
  11. One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated. It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.
  12. My credibility is 100%, assuming sane, rational people. You haven’t the slightest clue. Every time you resort to incoherent guesses as a diversion, it emphasizes that you maliciously lied. Your above post proved it once again … with your own testimony to betray you.…. as a malicious liar. …. and with that, I consign you to argue with yourself, BTK59.
  13. Was I referring to your plea deal that was ultimately dismissed or will be dismissed, considering that the date of February 2023 is not four years ago, but rather a recent no bill? It's important to note that this dismissal does not erase your record or the charges that were brought against you. A dismissal does not automatically expunge your arrest record, especially on felony charges. If your lawyer told you, he/she could, you were taken for a ride. Felony records stay with you forever. If you want people to believe that you are innocent of the crime, the dismissal alone does not prove it. It simply indicates that you managed to persuade a lawyer to argue that you are an elderly person with health issues, and the court took that into consideration. Therefore, the information still stands as an indictment of your behavior. Who cares if you're confidently at home? "True No Bill" is simply another way of expressing superseding charges. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain your focus on these matters. I wouldn't be surprised if this type of content about children was forbidden to you with certain conditions. Why would a blogger ignore it? That is a choice. Your credibility is nonexistent.
  14. My guess you are institutionalized in an Asylum somewhere and are mad and jealous, BTK59. It may be just a guess, but it fits the dialog.
  15. I stipulated here 4 years ago my mugshot and arrest. You are beating a dead horse because that’s the only horse you HAVE. You LIED about any convictions and sentencing, which never happened. Ask yourself, why four years later, I am still at home, I go anywhere I want to go, with no geographic restrictions, eat at Golden Corral three to five times a week with my wife, and attended the Memorial March 24. You lie about EVERYTHING! That is a PROVEN fact. You are a pompous bat-crap crazy blowhard. You prove that yourself with EVERY POST! With your continuous assistance, I am merely documenting it for posterity. …. and now … from your insane perspective …. I will NOW “allow” Srecko Sostar to say a few words….
  16. Cease your childish complaints. I have informed you previously: simply state your desired action, and I will proceed to publish your arrest record, mugshot, and the associated terms for your arrest, James Thomes Rook Jr, also known as Pudgy. I grant you at least that respect solely because I am aware that committing such an atrocious crime requires a disturbed state of mind. Say the word! Avoid avoiding the issue, stay focused, and say it directly without deviation or deflection! When it comes to child abuse or pedophilia, you should be the last person anyone considers. Your credibility on these issues is nonexistent since you have become involved in them. Speak up! I will be more than happy to assist.
  17. If you had the sense God gave a golf ball you would see I was demanding nothing. ….. just suggesting the only way you could have proved you are not a compulsive liar. We both know you are. Everybody reading these posts knows you are. When the moment of Truth arrived you choked, sputtered, and failed to prove your insane accusations. You lied.
  18. So, you officially choke and sputter with no proof, eh? Of course.
  19. Yesterday
  20. 😂 Who are you to demand that I prove myself to someone of such low character? You are certainly demonstrating an understanding of mental illness through your words. 😂 Once you're done with the childish behavior, I believe Srecko would like to contribute more of his misleading information to this discussion, if you're agreeable. I find his distortions highly enjoyable.
  21. May I suggest as a remedy for your exaggerated mental illness that you go on YouTube and watch both versions of “A Man For All Seasons”, full movie, about a 1500’s Englishman Sir Thomas More. An innocent man beheaded by the Crown legal system. You remind me, in either version, of King Henry VIII’s State Prosecutor so close it’s like you deliberately copied his personality.…. just an observation …. not an indictment. Both are GREAT movies, full of insights and lessons!
  22. PROVE I AM WRONG ABOUT YOU …. POST MY SENTENCING OR CONVICTION RECORDS. Because there are none, and I know that …. THAT proves, once again, you BTK59 are the agenda driven, malicious liar. That’s why you are the whack-a-mole.
  23. Your proposing irrelevant total crap made up from your imagination is not even a valid rebuttal. TO ANYTHING! The really sad thing is you don’t know that! If you are not living in a car or homeless, EVERYBODY has an address. Doxing is always evil, and often illegal. You stated I was a convicted sentenced criminal. POST THOSE DOCUMENTS! You can’t because they do not exist … which makes you once again, a PROVEN liar. …. and a malicious slanderer, and/or libelist. …. but THAT has already been proven from your own words , here on this forum many, many times in the past. Wally McNasty, failed comic sidekick and co-joined evil twin of the Vicar of Warwick.
  24. Really REALLY need a different hobby. May I suggest fishing or cicada stomping.
  25. If that's the best you have to offer, then we definitely need an air freshener for the words you just uttered. Your insults seem like nothing more than a feeble attempt to distract from the truth. It's clear that the room needs to be thoroughly ventilated to rid it of such negativity. 😂 If desired, I can provide the recorded address for you. Is that address included in or part of the United States? What does your mental state imply? That Gastonia N.C. is in Canada? 😁
  26. It is obvious you have absolutely no reading comprehension skills whatsoever. And all that crap you think up and post is irrelevant and immaterial, roughly the equivalent of “See! The United States IS a real place!! How dare you say it’s NOT! Every goofy premise you dream up is useless!
  27. I'm simply being respectful by asking, but I want to clarify that I don't require your authorization to share public information. If you have an inexperienced attorney pressuring you to have your personal record revealed with that sensitive information, I suggest recommending that they review the Freedom of Information Act and understand how your checkered past is covered. This applies to all those aspiring attorneys without education who provide misguided counsel.
  28. 🤣 Are you attempting to mislead with your arrogant claim that Gaston County is located in either North Carolina or Virginia? Although I initially refrained from mentioning Gastonia, North Carolina in order to be polite, I can now reveal the area code since you insist on deceiving others if you wish. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaston,_South_Carolina Speak the word directly without avoiding or evading it. Refrain from your regular habit of dishonesty. Just say the word, and I'll post the TRUTH!
  1. Load more activity



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.