And what have you learned regarding helping the children concerning talking to them about such things? Information you convey here and give insight to those on this forum and any onlooker who is a guest.
Yes that is true. Spiritual Jerusalem does not reject the Christ. Although Witness is as blind and misguided as ever so evident, Witness was aware of these despite confusing Earthly and Spiritual in the past, and did not make the correction even later on.
The New Covenant is of HIGH importance, we should not belittle ourselves to the level of stupidity and or ignorance of what it entails, something the MSC does not understand, the interfaith among them twist what it means and tarnish what t
Clearly, I do not kid.
So I suggest you answer the question, which I will quote again.
The others can be addressed based on you not recognizing the heirs:
Also in the link regarding the discussion about who the Destroyer is, you contradict regarding what is addressed here.
What you do not get is there are people, lost ones out there who want to learn about who God is, questions like this they themselves will ask as they make progress to accepting the teachings of t
@Equivocation I want to hear evidence from claim from him, this is a debate that is ongoing.
@Equivocation @Srecko Sostar
Also for the both of you, this is signs of a losing debate, as we can see what Srecko is suffering from.
Hello guest! Please register or sign in (it's free) to view the hidden content.
Apparently with little discernment, anyone who is on the receiving end of a debate is always angry, not to the point of becoming the hulk, no, but to the point of copyi
You do not agree, because if you had, your claims would have been talked about even more, for originally, I even told you, bring evidence to your claim whereas not even the Bible could save you in this regard. If you do not have anything related to JWs to hold your head, you end up dead in the water concerning this debate, and go about fish flailing and the most common moves made by someone on the losing end of a debate, an appeal to motive and Ergo Decedo.
My claims are not in err because