You may proceed.
The requirements are not high. You must simply make sure that you are not the most unpleasant person here. The mere fact that you raised the above two points guarantees that you will not be.
I have found in over 7000 posts that I can be rude, and belligerent, and insulting ... if the level of stupidity rises to the point where a "reasonable person" would conclude that it is a defense to previous insults and/or accusations, not based in fact.
And that insulting ideas and philosophies with provable facts is quite OK, here.
Ad Hominem attacks are never acceptable without a solid basis to do so.
...... and never invoke "Godwin's Law", unless you fully understand what it says and does not say.
I am ashamed to admit that you have many irrefutable points in you above post. I cannot refute any of them,
EXCEPT your quote, posted here on this post..
FACTS about such things are NATURALLY abusive and insulting to the agenda driven.
But, willy-nilly ... they are still facts.