Space Merchant

No at all, no copyright issues. The verse can easily be found on the main website of Jehovah's Witnesses' online Library, by simply clicking on the verse it gives you references as well as books and publications regarding the use of this verse and or passage. In a way, it is similar to the other Bible sites but not as complex. The Jehovah's Witnesses online library does not have commentary information, but they do quote people sometimes. But yeah, it was not that hard to look up, granted he is using their website to pull his information, must've forgotten about the online library. Yes. People, even here remain ignorant to the fact that Jehovah's Witnesses, at their core, even as Bible Students are Restorationist, hence Restorationist Christianity. Be it a single person or group, such ones are hardcore in striving to the teachings and practices of the early apostolic church. The irony here is the early church never believed in hell being the lake of fire but mainstream Christians teach this heresy, for in reality hell is simply the grave, for David is spoken of of making his bed in hell, Jonah, he himself was in the depths of hell, and so forth. They ignore the fact God reacted emotionally to fire torment in the Old Testament it was spoken of several times.

Rest easy. Of which cannot be done today, can be done tomorrow. This is because Restorationist as they are, they came to that realization very later on, mainly when you have verses like 1 Kings 8:2 and the Jewish Calendar,as well as the origins of the holiday itself. So after learning of such things, the Jehovah's Witnesses, also known as Bible Students, do not want to offend God by imitating these celebrations which incorporate so much falsehood and are associated with the most horrible beliefs from the past. The Bible does not specifically address smoking at all, however, it does provide some examples that offers an answer regarding this. Now, no one disputing that obvious fact that smoking is bad for your health. The Bible says that we should cleanse ourselves of every defilement regarding the flesh, to abstain from second-hand smoking and other harmful things. They never claimed or say Armageddon would start in 1975, therefore, the claims are incorrect. They still adhere to the 6,000 years of Creation. As o what meaning has changed? The Strong's are still correct in accordance with the manuscripts and other sources. Also can you provide more detailed information of the 3 times they changed this? Well you have to provide more details, as for the other stuff that has been debunked and the truth came to light. That being said, if you dislike and do not trust them, you are not doing yourself a favor by using their website.

@Srecko Sostar And yet you have not [stick to scripture], hence you didn't stick to scripture when you deem Abraham selfish and one who is influenced but he devil.

You spoke of yourself to be a former member of the Jehovah's Witnesses, pretty much a free agent Christian, so to speak, for passwords and logins are meaninglessness, for the focus was being an actual member vs. being a former member, you said you use to be one of Jehovah's Witnesses and you explained yourself the first time I ever responded to you. And oh, I can back it up, was trying to see if you'd actually take the time yo look it up yourself, as you did with the Biblehub response, of which didn't end too well for you. Here you go: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/b/r1/lp-e/nwt/E/2013/42/14#s=11&study=discover&v=42:14:11 you can see under marginal references of listed publication and non-outlined cross references. I can always back up my information, do not underestimate Mr. Butler because it will always come back to haunt you. It's a reminder. Because all that is said is 100% true, just like the Ambassadors and the whole bit about supplication - all correct in regards to the Strong's. Good attempt, but not close regarding this question. These types of questions are asked by those out there to whom you preach the gospel too. When they seek answers to questions like the one posed, you have to have a good answer with at least 1-2 bible verses and or a single passage to bring up. In this question an example regarding Jesus could have been made, but you missed that opportunity. If you were an Evangelizing Missionary, you would not last long if this question came up. But, I give you another shot at answering this question, hence Spiritual Wisdom. So I'll ask you again: How can you have free will if it is punishment for disobedience? I said somewhere before I do not get sarcasm, therefore, I see the response as literal, for spying in faith community is very absurd. That being said, these sources are indeed trusted. I can guarantee you, 110% that these sources are legit and I have relied on them for sometime now, mainly when I post information about Israel, the Religion of Babylon, and other things. Not quite, some take such a study as if it is a lifestyle, to be forever learning of the True God, his Son and the Kingdom. What God's message through the Bible conveys and so forth. One does not look at it from a human standpoint, of which this is the point I made regarding Tradition of Men and or Man's Understanding time and time again, and man's understanding does not have quite the relationship with pure biblical hermeneutics, i.e. 2 Corinthians 5:20 or when one brings up John 20:28 for instance, they can fully explain to you the truth of this verse vs. those who use man's understanding to assume Jesus is God, when in reality such ones avoid the final verse and Thomas' first mention and later mention in the New Testament. God's Word isn't impossible, nor his his Laws burdensome, yet we have folks wanting to cherry pick, twist and even say to others that this or that of God's Laws shouldn't be followed, or the fact that Jesus entrusted the Church with commands of which today's folk deem it too harsh. And yes I am spiritual, hence why I did you the honor of giving you quite the question.

I want to discuss about Armageddon, and yet you run back to the WT which will lead to another spin of responses. But to be brief, the Jehovah's Witnesses believe that Armageddon is the means by which God will fulfill his purpose for the Earth to be populated with happy healthy humans free of sin and death. They teach that the armies of heaven will eradicate all who oppose the Kingdom of God, wiping out all wicked humans on Earth, leaving only righteous mankind. That being said, Armageddon focused, what do you think it is? In details, no cryptic responses, please - keep it Bible focused.

You were formerly a Jehovah's Witnesses, surely you are not barred from your the very website you can still pull pictures from. Indeed, because nowhere in the Bible was a disciple of Christ was being tempted to kill out of his own will, thus the one of whom I speak of shed no information to back up his claim, you can remember this, but what was said has been said. Do what you must. How so? Give an example, for instance, Peter's nakedness when fishing. Everything said is correct, mainly with the Ambassadors and the supplication thing - correct. If you want to put my Spirituality to the test so be it, but as I told Srecko and Witness, stick to the scripture, but every time when this is said they run back to the Watchtower, when I even said even they cannot help them. So if you want to test my spiritual wisdom, we can start with this: How can you have free will if it is punishment for disobedience? Surely for someone who studies and read the Word daily, this one should be a no-brainer. If I am lacking, enlighten me. My day would be great if you can get Spiritual with this one. Free Radio Europe are not spies. They operate in the EU and were among the many barred by the State Duma new laws regarding outside broadcasting in Russia. Jake Morphonios isn't a spy because of him information about Las Vegas survivors who were killed is made public and a list of other things. Tim Pool, Soulja of God, Max Igan, T.A.U., Stefan Molyneux and a list of others... Tell me, are they spies? Surely they do not adhere to the mainstream media, for at least some of them had the audacity to speak of of grooming gangs while your own people target a whole faith community for the actions of a few in the UK and so forth bring chaos into a park because of it. Also Butler, you make a claim, I suggest you offer proof. What spies to I have in a faith community? I merely study Christianity, Judaism and Islam, why would I waste my own time spying? This claim of yours is as absurd as a cow in a dress... There is a thing called Biblical and Theological studies. As to when and where I have offended you, as you claim? Ah and yes, of course. I guess knowing way too much of the bible makes me a clown in your eyes, as Paul to those who throw him out of the city. I am glad I do, your remark on Peter's nakedness was quite amusing or what I sent over to the Christians against masturbation community, they had quite colorful words for you.

It never stops. The game of command and conquer is ongoing.

There is more going on in Russia than you realize. If anything, I recommend you seek the 777 crew, but you'll have to look them up in Russian. Free Radio Europe is another source. I know of a guy, irl friend of course, too, a non orthodoxy Christian, who knows some things. Other that all eyes in the Christian space is on Russia and Israel right now.

The only blood that should be of anyone's concern is the Christ. It isn't easy when one recognizes what Covenant he or she is under. In the end, as they put it, it is up to choice.

I know it isn't the case in some parts of the US. To me, even my own people, they see blood as something sacred, that blood is life, therefore consuming blood of any kind they will not do, be it from man or beast, far deeper than that there is superstition regarding blood use by those who are occult, those who practice voudou, to which in English is referred to as Black Magic, and such is practiced very heavily in forbidden areas of the country in the Caribbean. Anyone who practice such tends to consume not just blood, but flesh too, even from human beings, which is satanic to the highest degree. Although most of us live in the US or elsewhere, this part of which we abide by still in effect. Whenever we are to eat something, we clean it because in the US, chemicals is put on to the food, especially meats and poultry, seafood, we do so by using lemons and lime to clean with hot water. This is the same case as making sure the blood is 100% cleaned out, hence using lemon, lime and hot water, sometimes vinegar. I think what needs to be done is cleaning the meat properly, but for me, it angers me how some here, mainly in New York just unpack some red meat and throw it on the grill like that, no realize things can go south, others can get a sickness and or cancer. Another factor is what they are feeding the animals, such as Cows, Chicken, and or other, for if the Cows were given drugs and or some hormones or something of that nature, people can end up consuming such. I know there are JWs who are also Caribbean, some African, Latinos, they clean the meat thoroughly before eating, even non-JWs among them too. As for blood transfusions it is a mixed bag, for I know JWs are not the only Christians with this view. In Islam, they do not take blood unless you force them, but they are semi-compliant with another Muslim who is their doctor, for Jews, it is 50/50 for some are for it and others are not. Then you got Project Ambrosia, and the Black Market whereas young children and teens from Black and Latino communities.

I have the time and I make the time. If you noticed, there is a certain amount of time I am on and other times I am absent. Ah, using the word "stupid" now are we.... I it makes me question if I am dealing with a grown man or a mere child. I guess the term in application should the obvious, especially with the little smiley face at the end, so therefore, I know the type cryptic person I am dealing with. Your a grown man, that word is beneath you, or is that so. That being said, whenever it is not something technical, I spend most of my time at a Boys and Girls Club, helping the little ones, of which last time you assume you need to be a doctor or some sort to help out.... An absurd claim, on your part.

I would say he is semi-new. He was here several months ago I believe for I had the first discussion with him regarding his claim of focus.

It's not a support, it is merely correct the wrongs here. Like I told you before, if you say something that is in error, about Judaism, Islam and or even things of the Bible, I will speak, even if you say something out of line regarding JWs, I will speak, remember Glasgow and the Registry information you tried to pass off as something big? Things of that nature. Unitarianism isn't a movement.... Do you even know what a Unitarian is or which denominations among them are present? That being said, you'd be surprise of how Restorationist tend to agree with others on some points. Anyways, discussion, Armageddon, in accordance with you.

That's pretty much what is being talked about all over the place. But when people speak up, disgruntled ones will also speak and they will attack. Not all former JWs are on a warpath like their counterparts, but those that are on a warpath will be going nowhere.

Simply go to their online library, look up the verse and viola, as easy as making scrambled eggs. Biblehub and Gateway you simply scroll down and or look for commentary or it is spotted under Bible Study Tools website. That because I am. It is not something done on purpose for I have said knowledge is power. I do not care for I didn't come to impress, I come to correct. Also your trust in the guardian is somewhat.... telling. As for the other thing you said, most news media, news outlets and the like are not always trusted, for me, personally, I go to independent sources, 3 of which are very credible, mainly when it comes to world affairs and things happening, like in Israel and so forth, another in Russia. But it would seem someone who is educated offends you and others here. No worries. This is the case with those are as so, for the care isn't there but the information still presses forward.

And where have I mentioned or assumed that?

No one pays attention to what is going on in the world. Those who seek security will be at odds with these men shown above, angering the US, Israel and other US allies. The UK has their hands dirty too, granted they are US allies themselves. You have the Pope and the religion of Babylon seeking to united all religions into one fold. One seeks peace, the other seeks security and we know what that is all about. 1 Thessalonians 5:3 - While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. So far only a few of us, me included, is aware of what is going on. Also if you own any Huawei devices, you might want to seek an upgrade, there s spy chips in their, place of origin: China.

Some people are good at Whack-A-Mole Some people are just waaaay to good at Whack-A-Mole Some people are not good at Whack-A-Mole

Controversial Posts, thee cometh here best be ready, Fir it is smite or be smited here. In English, if I remember what the heading here use to be, something along the lines of you can be challenged or be put to task, something like that. I see it just as that.

Most parents and even friends do not see the signs at all, only those who are taught and or trained to see the signs of any kind of abuse and or neglect can see this very easily. The gift giving is a big red flag, and has always been this way regarding sexual abuse of children, this also goes with abuse in relationships, gift giving and the like. Not many parents talk about sex to their children when they are that age, let alone stranger danger and or bad associations. They often also ban their children from any sex-ed classes in school. NBC is not a trusted news media so one would have to dig deeper for information, for they also are known for hiding lies or not being truthful of their words. And yes, I agree on this also. Some people are not as knowledgeable, and the fact NBC news mentioned the Watchtower's two witness ruling, anyone who does the research can see this ruling has no play in this case, but they make it seem as such. As for the Scholars NBC speaks of, the only hardcore opponents of the Watchtower and Jehovah's Witnesses as a whole are Trinitarian Scholars. Why? Because JWs, like others, are Non-Trinitarian.

That is because you leave questions unanswered as well as you being cryptic with a hint of trickery, so they will be brought up and no, it isn't a method of teaching, it is bringing up claims in regards to such. You cannot heed command of the Christ if you think the way you do of very specific things, and you show yourself to be openly accepting of Traditions of Men in some of your claims and confusing passages, thus I will remind you every time until you better yourself. You are dealing with a Unitarian from CSE, what did you expect? That being said, I only bring them up briefly because I know if I bring up the specifics, you will wiped them out. What is being asked of you is recent stuff, not past items so I ask you the following: You directed your last response towards me being stubborn and persistent. So how is it this time I am somehow a Jew part of a Jewish Community? You can start with that, in the other thread you can address what is being asked of you there - otherwise this will be a reminder of you just as your very reflect always reminds you of who you are everyday and every night. How haven't I noticed if I am the one who brings it up time and time again? I bring it up so people know your stance, so they can see for themselves or before such information is wiped out. You know by now I respond to a response, if you've forgotten of how this recent response come to this point, there is no spinning because if the topic is of your focus, you'd have to checked. I didn't start the thread, Srecko, look again and see how things turned up the way they are, you were not too focused yourself. If you want to speak about Armageddon, speak your resolve now, but this time when you want to go back to this focus, you say, do so without adding opinion and emotion into the text, use the Bible this time, nothing else but that and what the Word itself says.

How many times have I told you when I said I study religions and theology? Must I tell you a 6th time, a 7th, perhaps an 8th? You do not have to be a JW to know how they function, if scholars can study a religion, so can those who take the time to read into Christian history. If you want to play that game, you do not have to be a reader of the Bible to understand what Ambassadors in Bible times are. That being said my response was not directed to you, but if it is such you seek, it is such you shall have. And? What I have written down is their function in terms of how and where they get their rules from, nothing more. So Christians listening to Clement of Rome, Apostle Paul, and Timothy were possibly robots. You already spoke of religious leadership as something of pharisees with no facts to back it up. Anyone and everyone leaves any religion for something, even that of child abuse, it is no surprise, as I had told you before, it is the same with JWs. We are all imperfect, JWs, even their leaders are also imperfect, for as I told Srecko, who thinks there is perfection in some folks, all men are imperfect regardless of how you try to knock it. I heard your story already even months ago and I know the specifics of your story, unless you have forgotten my very first discussion with you. If you had the experience, you know more about your former faith that surface information. All of them? Ever ran into Kathgar? Who is a JW, who lives in England and is one of the many, many people who ends up at Speaker's Corner? Surely you'd know more, Butler. Other than that, this is going on your word because there others, both JWs or former, who had very different things to say. Indeed, a few points. They are all over the place. I have believed you if you forget our first discussion, I even gave you encouragement and you showed yourself to be sincere, but it would seem you threw that all out of the window, and show yourself to bash and insult when you see fit. When I spoke against brazen conduct, you make it seem that God does not help such folks, and your word I showed to others of that community who were literally running a lynch mob at every word you said. And how is it I do not believe you when I have in the past? Don't assume things. Child Abuse is globe and everywhere, not just within JWs, a few weeks ago a girl was taken into a men's room and nearly molested, he was taken care of and nearly met with Jungle Justice and a list of other things. I even told you such things are not the same elsewhere and or is unheard of in places, like the Congo and others. To assume child abuse only happens with solely JWs is being narrow minded and ignorant, this is ALL over the place, also you should know what your money does in such things, like in the EU, in the UK as is done in the US also. This is coming from a guy who deals with young ones who speak boldly of this issue as with young adults, even I teaching them and they teaching others to see the signs and help prevent child abuse. That being said, if the specifics in the story are said, let it be known, at least take that into consideration. Therefore, all I have said, regarding this article is in correct, I am still reviewing other sources too, and can update if I have to.

And those who maintain faith ere burned at stakes, fed to the dogs, killed and used in rituals and a list of other things as time progresses to present day and onward. I can imagine a day will come where things can be outlawed for in some parts of the US you can't even read and or quote the Bible. Some Atheists tend to detest all religions, others, among them, do not, they wish to understand religion and the Bible, others to the Qu'ran. And there is that small few that will go out of their way to cause problems. Also true, but not all admins are the same, as to why I compare them to Game Masters, for you take his or her gold, they can boot you from the server, in this sense, admins tend to have a large control of a forum space, but at times can feel somewhat threatened and or other, thus taking action. Although this is true, there are some admins who have a chill personality, and as we can see this thread isn't locked yet. At all people like to hear the voices of others, be it the truth or false truths. That is his situation, for we had an example some months ago with a specific individual on this forum. He is still here, but is rumored to be under a different name and possibly pops up on occasion, mainly when anything more focused on Watchtower specifics is being talked about. The truth should always be spoken, but not everyone likes hearing the facts, thus resorting to name calling and a few other things, also repetitive things in an attempt to get a thread closed, and or topic derailing. It is open, however things can get a little hectic. It isn't as bad as several other forums which can go from a rain forest to fire blazed woodland in an instant. But originally, this area in the forums use to be called Controversial Post where often times you can be challenged and you have to be ready. Although it does not say that, such atmosphere is still present and we end up having forums posts like this.

Not out of context, it is actually true, hence why I put forth the examples. I don't mind the insult because I am unfazed, this is going from a man who has seen things you consider unreal. And no, everything uttered is exact truth unlike your claims of Peter being tempted or Chloe leading a church. I don't. For as said to you before I am bounded by what the Bible says, what the church teaches, what comes from God, his Christ and the Word that is written. I am bounded by my culture in terms of respect, truth and integrity and so forth. I speak what is right because such ones like to cloud information, such ones base their belief on opinions and emotion, not realizing what is the actual truth in the matter. That being said, tell me Srecko, how am I basing everything on my own feelings and emotion, in this sense? And no, my culture does not allow to be prideful and or righteous, nice try though. I am always relaxed. I have changed lives, I have made a bit of change in the world, in my own country when it was hit by an earthquake and have witnessed death and a list of other things, even coming face to face with the occult that has plagued the islands, to add more salt to injury, our children was nearly taken into human trafficking and someone who was fighting against it was assassinated and his death ruled out to be a suicide and yet we still press forward. I helped out in Texas and even Puerto Rico when it was hit by the hurricane, when Sandy hit in 2012, I helped out on rebuilding the shore. I went to Africa and Thailand and met some good people, some of which who didn't know God, and the list goes on. I do not care what I was given, I do not do things to show off, I did such things because I choose to for God's people are able bodied and will give a helping hand. Others can have their say, but surely no one is going to accept correction from a man, who stated God isn't surprised about people who change not just their sex, but their literal reproductive organs. It is thinking like that that shows you are not putting into application of God's Word let alone confusing Barak for Deborah, purposely, if you forgot that one. If you want to "correct" show me evidence your Chloe claim, as with Peter's temptation because when I asked you, you dodged and evaded several times. Perhaps this time you can speak to correct something you yourself know to be false.

Have you bother to take 2 seconds to scroll down? You yourself stated that regarding Luke 14:11 the GB has their own idea of what it is vs. others, or should I quote you? Your GB say that they are important, exalting themselves, and we know what Luke 14 v 11 says about those that exalt themselves don't we ? The WT says the following, for this is but one of several: The need to be humble was repeatedly stressed by Jesus: Become like a little child; take a lowly seat at a banquet; when praying be like the lowly tax collector, not like the self-righteous Pharisee. Note also that a command to be humble served as the springboard for Jesus’ scathing denunciation of the proud and hypocritical religious leaders of his day. In striking contrast to their proud course was the humble course of Jesus, that of honoring God at all times: “I do nothing of my own initiative.” His very coming to earth as well as his entire earthly sojourn was a shining example of humility, as the apostle Paul so clearly shows at Philippians 2:5-8. Typical of Jesus’ humility was his willingness to wash the feet of his apostles.—Matt. 18:3, 4; Luke 14:7-11; 18:9-14; Matt. 23:12; John 8:28; 13:5. They also have more to say, So applying the expression to these two classes, it becomes understandable in all its different settings, and makes sense whether referring to situations in Israel in Jesus’ day among the Jews, or referring to the addition of Gentiles to the church class, or to conditions in Christendom in these last days. The exalted clergy class once thought to be first are abased to last, and humble ones abased to last God exalts to first position with him.—Luke 14:11. Let's go to Biblehub: (11) Whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased.--The reproduction of the teaching in words which are almost an echo of these, in 1Peter 5:5, is interesting as showing the impression which it had made on the minds of the disciples. For whosoever exalteth himself,.... Either in the above way, or any other, shall be abased, humbled and mortified: and he that humbleth himself; behaves in an humble and modest manner, shall be exalted; See Gill on Matthew 23:12. 11. whosoever, etc.—couching them in a chaste simplicity and proverbial terseness of style which makes them "apples of gold in a setting of silver." (See on [1668]Lu 18:14). 14:7-14 Even in the common actions of life, Christ marks what we do, not only in our religious assemblies, but at our tables. We see in many cases, that a man's pride will bring him low, and before honour is humility. Our Saviour here teaches, that works of charity are better than works of show. But our Lord did not mean that a proud and unbelieving liberality should be rewarded, but that his precept of doing good to the poor and afflicted should be observed from love to him. So how is this different from what the GB were spouting about? You did consider Biblehub interesting, but when it is in use, somehow the interest has subsided. then am I wrong regarding my response, to you about Luke 14:11? Am I wrong regarding Restorationist Christology? Am I wrong because someone assume human and angels can be hybrids? Am I wrong for correcting a man who compares me to a Jew, let alone thinks a woman led a church in Corinth? Or am I wrong for correcting someone regarding nakedness in terms of the Greek Language? Tell me Mr. Butler if I am not correct on these things, speak your resolve. And no, I do not seem to know anything and everything, I am always learning, as I have been learning about religion, the bible and a list of other things for years now. But it would seem if someone knows way too much, they are often found as targets because they come to correct. But I can correct you on any biblical violation you speak, or of any Christology. When I corrected you on Peter, it was as accurate as 2+2 equaling 4. Indeed, this forum is enough, but you have to remember where you are, for originally this space you can always get a response, even challenged, for this use to be Controversial Posts and this still applies. No need to be simplistic, Butler, I know who they are and their church structure. In the early church, Christians of the church followed people of God such as Apostle Paul, Timothy, and others. One of which being Clement of Rome (90-96 A.D.). He may be the Clement mentioned in Paul's epistle to the Philippians. This epistle to the Corinthians does not carry his name, but is simply addressed from the church at Rome to the congregation at Corinth. However, a epistle from Corinth to Rome a few decades later refers to "the letter we received from your bishop Clement, which we still read regularly. Other early writers are unanimous in attributing the epistle to Clement. The epistle is occasioned due to a group of Christians at Corinth who had banded together against their leaders and had deposed them from office. Clement writes to tell them that they have behaved wrongly, and to remind them of the centrality of Christian unity and love. So in this sense, you have the Church and it's people, and there is one, a pastor/bishop who takes the lead among them, for that is referred to as Orderly Worship. In the case of the GB, they do not do such on their own, for they, being the Restorationist as they are, put that into application, hence you have 8 of them who is taking the lead among 8.5 million plus others. I remember before you made the false claim that leadership of the church is of Pharisee, yet you completely ignore the fact that Paul and others led, even wrote to the Churches. So if you want to call people puppets, I, as I told those who are Anti-Pauline, to tear anything regarding Paul from your Bible if you do not agree with him, or the Christ, you should same if that is your view. No one worships religious leaders. They are in place to give advise and instruct, as did Paul, as did others. No one worshiped Paul they took instruction, as is the case if you paid attention to and read both letters to the Corinthians. You are going to have to prove the claim that elders of a church worships religious leaders because I see no proof of this in your words, therefore, I can say you are incorrect. See, very simple, if you understood Church Structure. Learn it: https://www.gotquestions.org/church-hierarchy.html They say this because there are denominations that say things of God that is not true, and or anything of the bible. Example is what you stated about Peter's nakedness, you assume something literal and of what is found in a dictionary, but the Strong's says otherwise, Peter was girdled before he went fishing. I need not have to explain the ambassadors thing again also because such things is taken out of context, of which have shown to do before - as with with assuming we do not follow the commandments when the foremost commandments has said commendations in principle. It is both an agreement and a disagreement because not many, outside of JWs take the time to know what the truth is, something of which I mentioned in the past, even quoting people like Simon Brown, Brother Kel and even from Muslims who point out that you do not need a JW to help you understand the Bible. I also posted evidence of former JWs who clearly do not know what is in the Bible and are quick to speak badly about them, examples like Magic Hands, Bob the Builder, and the 3 men who believes the Holy Spirit is a person. Brother Kel, who does not hold to any denominational, even said it himself for those who leave JWs often end up adhering to the accursed, he himself is neutral with JWs. You do not have to like or even agree with the religious leaders of JWs, but to speak of slander and or deceit, even pushing insult, infighting or conspiracy, a correction will be made. Well if you had seen what I stated to witness, I will do what I have always done. I will not make a response to you unless your information is correct. As for what issues? We have to speak what is accordance to the Bible, which brings us back to Luke 14:11. WT and Biblehub as with ALL Bible Study and Tools website point to the same exact information for this verse. So if you say that the WT only comes up with such regarding this verse, I will simply point out that it is not only them, it is everyone. Therefore, do the research regarding anything biblical, even a single verse, then say something. And you're welcome, not everyone scrolls down to commentary on the hub or Gateway.