Foreigner

Hmm! Let’s see. 4 and 8. What does that make them, children or an adult with a hunger for a child? That you (sod!) is meaningless rhetoric. Much of what you, TTH, JTR, and Anna are accustomed to. No different from those (ponce) ex-witnesses that have no life but to be here spewing their venom while JTR defends them against bullies while being a bully himself. Yet he has the nerve to question my state of mind when you people are worse, good one JTR. Everything a pedophile would think of.

12 minutes ago, Matthew9969 said:

Honestly, did you get your mommy's and daddy's permission to use their computer. Get your mind out of the gutter kid.

I don’t know, does your mommy let you use hers? When it comes to attacking the Watchtower you pathetic people talk a big game, but when one of you is as disgusting and pathetic as any pervert, then it’s get your mind out of the gutter and grow up.

Why don’t you grow up and get a life. Better yet, go back to that pathetic church you go to and confess your blasphemous sins to get a peace of mind that they can wash them away, while knowing they cannot.

50 minutes ago, James Thomas Rook Jr. said:

According to you, Dick Van Dyke marrying a competent, capable woman who was FORTY YEARS OLD  is pedophilia.

He is now 92, and she is now 47, and each one complements the other.

Whatever you have to tell yourself. Personally, I was referring to the "optics" not the pathetic attempts you're trying so hard to justify. I guess that's what a disgusting pervert needs to keep telling himself to sleep good at night. Had he been 47, she would have been 7 years old or nonexistent, with a perversion in his mind by thinking of having someone that young or hasn't been born as a sex partner. There's no way out of the depravity and sickness JTR. I just hope you weren't married when you made the play. That in itself is disgusting. But given the environment here, not surprising.

Hmm! Trying to justify yourself like a pedophile would by looking for excuses to say it's not wrong. The same can be applied to anyone with a huge age difference.

3 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

It was a visit to this place that made me do whatever was necessary:

It's good you can insult yourself TTH. If it was one in our group your hypocrisy would be apparent when someone would log in to find the word “Banned” deleted because of faceless witnesses not in good standing like Anna, JWinsider, JTR that even Matthew9969 considers “lukewarm”. They are not lukewarm but an affront to false prophets.

Now show the world by censoring, deleting, or banning me, as is accustomed by you, people here. You can tell the truth about yourself, but others can’t.

Remember, Anna hates bad grammar just like the pathetic commentaries made by JWinsider, JTR to make light of those mistakes as though anyone really cared about those pathetic comments.

Let it go author, you’re not fooling anyone. You, Anna, JTR, JWinsider are too predictable now.

6 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

@JW Insider did not write TrueTom v Apostates. He did not write Dear Mr. Putin. I wrote them. There were portions that I forwarded to him for comment. To that extent, he had input. His comments were most helpful and every time I ignored them I came to regret it. I got all excited about a statistical factoid from the follow-up Aussie case study. He told me it wasn’t so watertight as I had imagined. He was right and I downgraded it to a suggestive pointer.

I don’t believe anyone has said JWinsider wrote those books and that your grammar is lousy, even though your gang seems to "harp" on it, including you as I recall with a few people here, that's rich so let’s get off that deception and not change the subject. I believe the point is, your weak assertion that a witness not in good standing gave you input and you lied about it.

Now you seem to imply you regret not listening to a person that goes against the bible principle and has unchristian conduct to say the least as his strength.

I think that’s where “birds of a feather flock together” surmises. I don’t know who’s worse when it comes to deception.

But then again, writers do have to stick together, especially ones that are not important and corrupt just like one from the other post.

You are also correct when you state none of you here are true witnesses. If I didn’t know better, “Anna” quoted from a former member of the LDS in her remarks. I wonder if Anna and JWinsider are LDS disguising themselves as witnesses. Speculation, maybe far-fetched, maybe not. That certainly would answer a lot of questions, wouldn’t it? If I recall, JWinsider once said he couldn’t get enough of Ellen G. White quotes here.

Ah! How sweet, TTH cares. They pretend to despise one another, but from author to novelist, the bond is greater between writers, that’s lovable. However, was JTR already married?

The Oscar goes to!

I can't remember JTR, which one did you give me? The (RED PILL) or the (BLUE PILL). Which one works in your fantasy world the best?

Hmm! What you are saying, you would excuse your behavior just like a pedophile. Well! Well!

How many 6.6 white males with your name on it are there in this world, expect of course senior. Maybe the 4^th. Oh! No, wait a minute, that’s you too.

I didn't want to embarrass you more by saying you would actually be 53 years old, while The Ukrainian sister would be 13 years old, at 66. A 34 year difference. 😎

If I was you, I would deny! Deny! Deny! Being a bully, advocate and all. That doesn’t make it any less factual. 😁

No! No! No! Computer hacking attempts! TTH, JWinsider  😉

James Thomas Rook, Jr. I was just curious. You say you’re an advocate against bullies. You are an advocate in support of apostates that have dug in their pathetic heels about a global epidemic of child abuse to single out the Watchtower.

1.       How are you NOT a bully here?

 2.       What would be the difference when you were 66 years old hitting on a 32 year old Ukraine sister? Keep in mind, when you were 32-34 years old, she would have been 13 years old. So forth and so on.

 Now I understand the defense, I didn’t ask anyone that young, she was 32 years old. I’m referring to the optics of the age difference had you been younger and wooing the same girl with that amount of age difference.

My question is, how can a pathetic, sick pervert justify their mental state and defend themselves with that of a significant age difference that can’t be compared to how a pedophile views younger children? Wouldn’t the optics be the same in the heart and mind of said individual?

1 hour ago, Srecko Sostar said:

In Old Jew Society, based on religious doctrines, Women especially (and Female Children) are Objects and Private Property. That is visible from some Law aspects on rape issue and Slavery issue in general, and about Slavery in Military Battles or in case of the conquest of the land. In such battles all males was killed and all females (children and virgin women) that looked fine, attractive and sexually desirable, to male Israel soldiers, was taken as prey, war price, and finished in Israel as slave (for pleasure too), wife, or whatever seems right to Israelites. 

What you are saying, You want a world with NO authority. You are advocating this system be run in chaos. You prefer to see humanity as it was before the flood. Check Please!

6 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

Nobody here has had any “input” on any of them except me. Part 1 is simply a real-time retelling of events in Russia as they unfolded. Input came from monitoring news reports, plus my own experiences throughout the letter-writing campaign.

TTH, I would go back to past comments and say it again with a straight face. Even I recall, when you mentioned JWinsider as the only one giving input.

9 hours ago, Arauna said:

There are no lost sheep here to have pity on..... they love the garbage (pigs food) they are eating in their "debauched" state.  They have no thoughts of returning to the good food of their loving father. Until that happens - you are wasting your time.

I would have to agree with you on this one. I just have to remember to include certain “witnesses” here that don’t accept God’s word as well.

What I don’t appreciate though is being made an example of by TTH when he should concentrate on rebuking others or none of us at all. Where does he get off singling out someone before he takes a hard look at himself first?

Just because I gave a reason why, certain governments are now looking at restricting access to the internet because of privacy and data breach concerns that will limit hate speech on another post, he goes out and insults me. Who in the world does this Christian think he is. To me, he is nobody.

By the way TTH. We haven’t seen you communicating with JWinsider just like when a member of our group “Billythekid46” got banned because of both of you. We know how you operate, bronze. If you want to continue to pretend, that’s your bag of lies.

I won’t respond to JTR narcissism and uneducated antics. But thanks for the inspirational message.

8 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

He doesn’t exactly respond well to reproof, much less to the rebuke that he routinely triggers. And “display of anger?”—tell me about it.

It’s not anger, it’s responding to outsiders the way they talk about the Org. Interestingly, you only like to rebuke witnesses for telling the truth. I would suggest you look at yourself before you attempt to rebuke others. That way, you won’t seem to defend ex-witnesses like Anna, ComfortMyPeople, JWinsider, JTR. Even though you seem screwy and cantankerous. Don’t worry so much about Moses. Instead concentrate on what Jesus will do with the sheep and goats.

Once again, if you are going to use me as an example, be prepared to put your Bible Knowledge to the test. If not, lay-off.

I know, you are setting me up to be “banned” just like others that defend the truth. That's okay, you can't delete everyone in this world. Part of regulating data. It is to keep people like you that are biased, to treat matters on equal footing.

22 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

It finally dawned upon

the troublesome “Foreigner” that Mr. Admin is not a Witness, and he said that now he realized it. 

He didn’t know that? Admin has said it often enough. “So here you come charging like a bull,” I told him, “upbraiding for apostasy anyone displaying the slightest deviation from the latest writing of the Witness organization, far in excess of what they would ever insist upon themselves, and you do it all before unbelievers, making Witnesses look ridiculous!”

Since you want to use me as an example and NOT an outsider, and since you want to defend outsiders because you’re too lazy to get your own material for your books, then accept the consequences when you and your kind exploit something that was supposed to be beneficial for all of us.

It’s your kind that ruined it. You and your kind took the freedom of speech to a different level, it became acceptable to the devil. Why have someone call themselves “witnesses” when in reality they are, apostates.

So, don’t push it off on The WorldNewsMedia. Deal with the consequences you and JWinsider made the WorldNewsMedia out to be.

It then falls on you, which makes the Witnesses look ridiculous!

7 hours ago, Srecko Sostar said:

to cut into pieces in a rough and violent way, often without aiming exactly  

- https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hack

I'm sure you know better between computer hacking, and literal hacking. Why would you demonstrate how you really feel about hacking to pieces,  JW's. I'm sure there are laws against that in your country. At least for the time being.  I don't think I need to show you the definition of computer hacking. Maybe I do.

Computer hacking refers to the practice of modifying or altering computer software and hardware to accomplish a goal that is considered to be outside the creator's original objective. Those individuals who engage in computer hacking activities are typically referred to as " hackers ."

No, I’m educating you on how not to argue silly things. Font size is irrelevant. If you have a problem with it, then speak, not to the “owner” of The WorldNewsMedia, but to the owner of this part of the site. TTH and JWinsider.

It would be simple to conclude, JTR also has special privileges since evil and disingenuous people like him have to fight off other people that speak the truth. Once a leech latches on to suck the blood, it’s difficult to remove.

I agree with Arauna, and Melinda, the original POST is JW OPPOSERS GROUPS. Let’s keep the “KISS” ideology on every subject you wish to degrade, without diminishing your opinion with silly things.

7 hours ago, Srecko Sostar said:

Well, how would look like WT artistic picture about this: who and how clean His buttock after He had big toilet need as baby and in more few years in His childhood? And after, He has doing that by himself.

Do we need those pictures too?

I would suspect this question to be for witness. That person goes out on every subject to see what will stick. Jesus's appearance that should be portrayed in the best light for Christians, has been a failure to argue, just to find another thing to criticize the Org for and backfire for non-Christians.

Since you are the same, then both of you are failing by arguing nonsense.

8 hours ago, Srecko Sostar said:

What is very significant is size of letters in this quote. I suggest, if i may, that letters in by you and your kind.   need to be even smaller, smaller and smaller and to be finally invisible. Speaking about "your kind" telling also to what kind you belong! :)))

Since you are an uneducated individual, I will refer you to TTH and JWinsider on why the fonts end up the way they do. It’s their code on this forum. It’s their attempt to hack certain people to find whatever they are looking for. Don't subject yourself to childish posts.

54 minutes ago, Witness said:

None of us here, walked the earth when Jesus did.  None of us, can know for certain if his hair was always washed, neat and trimmed with a good pair of scissors.  Especially, during the 40 days and nights he spent in the wilderness, which was the theme of the painting by the Russian artist.     But, there is one thing that I am most confident in knowing.  Jesus Christ today, does not wear a red, comical superman cape, that your leaders have taken the liberty in assuming he does.     They've really stretched the boundary of scripture there, haven't they!

I will say, you are stretching the boundary of scripture in all your comments.

I guess you were there to know, when Jesus went to the Temple, he was filthy, and unclean. Providing he did go after being in the wilderness for 40 days without cleaning up first. That seems deceptive and is an antithetical approach to what Jesus looked like.

If you want to depict Jesus looking like an animal just like Nebuchadnezzar looked like when he went insane, and want to convince people you know better, just to win a failing argument, you have no faith, and you are no Christian.

I suspect Jesus had more “respect” and “honor” for his father than what you are making him out to be.

The Watchtower depiction of Jesus shows him as the Son of God, the Son of Man, and a Great Teacher. What does your depiction show, an erred perception of long hair, just like Christendom. 

14 hours ago, Witness said:

So there is no distinction between what the Catholics thought Jesus looked like, and the organization.  Hmmm.  No spiritual insight by those in “Jehovah’s organization” (yes, I said it again) that Jesus was a native Jew and probably took on the characteristics of a native Jew, as his cousin John the Baptist did in the drawing above. You are telling me that no distinction is seen in this area between Christendom's perception and the organization's perception. 

Hmmm. No spiritual insight by you and your kind.

You can show depiction of Jesus all you want. It doesn’t prevent the fact that you are wrong just like your former religion was wrong, just like your new religion is wrong.

It is a futile endeavor to insinuate what you and science think Jesus looked like. The Watchtower just like everyone else can be confident, Jesus didn’t have long hair just like your depiction shows. His skin color was native to the Nazarene's. Olive color. Some stipulate Jesus was a lighter shade of olive color. What his eye color was, is debatable. What clothes he wore is debatable. If people had their feet washed, sandals were probably used.

Another mistake made by you to justify your inconsistent message.

Scripture does stipulate in 1 Corinthians 11:14 the roles in worship. If you can’t understand scripture, why bother with pictures.

Today’s depiction of Christ by the Watchtower regardless of the criticism here by you is closer to being correct than how Christendom, still continues to portray Christ including yourself.

17 hours ago, Witness said:

Through the eyes of a Catholic and not through the eyes of a member of "Jehovah's organization".   

Then your own sarcastic eyes deceive you since Catholics are the ones that started, Jesus was white, blonde hair, blue eyes through its early teachings of the Vatican. Don’t be deceptive to ignore your own failure as a human being if you consider yourself Christian.

Writing, Jehovah’s Witnesses organization over and over to insinuate you’re more of a failure than the organization is telling enough. The same kind of information is found with people that support your kind of disingenuous substance by their submissions.

On 10/5/2019 at 5:41 PM, Allen_Smith said:

My original Tag, was “AllenSmith”. I can’t use it because it’s blocked. I have always used AllenSmith as my identifier. Example: Allensmith24, AllenSmith34, etc.

Hey Allen, good to see you back online. 

7 minutes ago, admin said:

Getting rid of someone else’s speech can be pleasing until the State decides that YOUR voice is now prohibited. Then you’ll scream for it. In your own bedroom. 

Something that's often done to people here for the wrong reasons. Data privacy is one way to regulate hate speech. Now that I know you are NOT a JW, then I understand the "BAN" on honesty in which you prohibit certain speech, thanks. There should be no further inference TTH.

15 hours ago, JW Insider said:

Did you make this up?

Instead of sarcasm, try looking at the picture posted by that individual, and the time frame it indicates. Then Srecko can really laugh on how silly your post is, along with Anna that likes a demeaning and ignorant post.

1 hour ago, Witness said:

o, these new adjustments by God's people, no matter how small; like portraying Christ as blond and blue-eyed while his dark, curly haired cousin baptized him, could be influenced by society 's (of the world) viewpoint at the time? 

How did you see Jesus when you were young? Let's try to be a little honest.

16 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

Since it is only one state—California, is there some tool so that you could block anything from that state. If you and enough webmasters do such, and Californians are blocked from enough sites, citizens will feed their politicians to the sharks. (who may spit them out).

Why would you continue false information and hate to continue? Didn't you say you are a witness? The problem is, California usually sets a legal  precedent for other states to follow. If anything, you should blame people like JTR, witness, Shiwiii, Srecko, etc. for having the government to rethink how much freedom of speech has, especially when it threatens the lives of people by hate speech. 

What should be advocated is the censorship of such people in websites. Since Webmasters aren't willing, then it's up to the government to take control. Then again, you should know being a webmaster.