Jump to content
The World News Media

AlanF

Member
  • Posts

    1,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by AlanF

  1. Post a link to wherever you think he was that. Of course, you'll never do that.
  2. As usual you were lied to by your Creationist sources. Try looking at the entire video interview posted by non-Creationist sources. But of course, you'll never do that.
  3. You really do think you're clever. But here's another one for you and your idiot girlfriend:
  4. Such an idiot! The point is that Dawkins does not believe in any sort of Panspermia. That was Stein's contribution. Much like my saying: "Hey TTH! If pigs could fly, where might they nest?" And you answered with speculation. And then I said: "See! That idiot TTH thinks pigs can fly!"
  5. Pure conspiracy theory claptrap. And Dawkins never said what you claim. Rather, he was tricked by Ben Stein into speculating. As part of an idiotic Creationist movie, Stein asked him: IF life did not originate on earth, then please speculate where it came from. Your Young-Earth Creationist sources are showing.
  6. Lamer and lamer and lamer. Next you'll be insulting me with "Your mother wears Army shoes!"
  7. I'm perfectly well aware that your writing and thinking are horrendously sloppy. That's why much of what you write is of Meh quality.
  8. LOL! at the lame attempt at justifying your sloppy writing. Sloppy writing comes, of course, from sloppy thinking -- something you've been trained in from your JW infancy.
  9. I did not say that I could not find the lecture -- I said that TTH did not bother to give a source reference.
  10. "Young-Earth Creationism" by the usage of those who call themselves that includes not just the idea that the universe was created some 6,000 years ago, but all life as well. As the Society itself said, that is ridiculous and unscientific. Why? Because it goes against well-established science. Equally ridiculous and unscientific is the claim that life is only some 27,000 years old -- which the Society itself more or less abandoned 40 years ago, but you are too stupid to accept.
  11. Point being: it is grossly hypocritical and intellectually dishonest to rail against science for being unable to explain the origin of life -- which scientists freely admit -- yet refuse to consider the much worse problem of the origin of God.
  12. Yet another fine example of, as Wolfgang Pauli once said of an errant colleague's paper: "it's not even wrong". TTH is not even able to give a source for "Shermer's lecture".
  13. True Tom Harley is the resident expert in deliberately missing the point: "They" obviously don't think that their false equation is faulty. Rather, "they" do it in order to create a false impression of what constitutes the two in the minds of their ignorant followers: "We JWs are NOT creationists!" When, of course, they're both generic creationists and what I'll call "young-life creationists" -- creationists who claim that life is at most 20,000 years old. Of course, since the Society has abandoned explicit mention of "7,000-year creative days", most JWs under the age of 45 are not even aware of the abandoned tradition and have no problem accepting modern scientific dating for the age of life. Point being: it is grossly hypocritical and intellectually dishonest to rail against science for being unable to explain the origin of life -- which scientists freely admit -- yet refuse to consider the much worse problem of the origin of God.
  14. Yes. That's why she's a complete moron, out of touch even with 40-year-old Watchtower "new light".
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.