xero
-
Posts
1,745 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
52
Reputation Activity
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in THIS IS NOT SATIRE! THIS IS NOT PARODY. THIS IS DEMENTED INSANITY ON PARADE!
I'm not surprised about anything any more. When I see the scope of the evil that humans have brought to life on this planet I'm at a loss as to why Jehovah hasn't ended this nonsense a long time ago. I can no longer even imagine a series of events which would lead me to conclude that the end was something I should be expecting, as in the manner normal humans have as to expectations. All I can say is that the end will happen at an unexpected time, which could mean that my expectations based on events have to be thoroughly exhausted and then when it is no longer even possible to expect anything, then the end will come. But I say hasn't this already come to pass for many, many thousands upon thousands of people besides me and my puny thoughts? So even if I might contingently be exhausted as regards my expectations, then the end isn't anything contingent on anything any one of humanity might be expecting.
-
xero got a reaction from Anna in THIS IS NOT SATIRE! THIS IS NOT PARODY. THIS IS DEMENTED INSANITY ON PARADE!
I'm not surprised about anything any more. When I see the scope of the evil that humans have brought to life on this planet I'm at a loss as to why Jehovah hasn't ended this nonsense a long time ago. I can no longer even imagine a series of events which would lead me to conclude that the end was something I should be expecting, as in the manner normal humans have as to expectations. All I can say is that the end will happen at an unexpected time, which could mean that my expectations based on events have to be thoroughly exhausted and then when it is no longer even possible to expect anything, then the end will come. But I say hasn't this already come to pass for many, many thousands upon thousands of people besides me and my puny thoughts? So even if I might contingently be exhausted as regards my expectations, then the end isn't anything contingent on anything any one of humanity might be expecting.
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in THIS IS NOT SATIRE! THIS IS NOT PARODY. THIS IS DEMENTED INSANITY ON PARADE!
I'm not surprised about anything any more. When I see the scope of the evil that humans have brought to life on this planet I'm at a loss as to why Jehovah hasn't ended this nonsense a long time ago. I can no longer even imagine a series of events which would lead me to conclude that the end was something I should be expecting, as in the manner normal humans have as to expectations. All I can say is that the end will happen at an unexpected time, which could mean that my expectations based on events have to be thoroughly exhausted and then when it is no longer even possible to expect anything, then the end will come. But I say hasn't this already come to pass for many, many thousands upon thousands of people besides me and my puny thoughts? So even if I might contingently be exhausted as regards my expectations, then the end isn't anything contingent on anything any one of humanity might be expecting.
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in The wonderful world of ChatGPT!! . . . and "humor"?
Speaking of humor. I like this guy and I learned some things at the same time.
-
xero reacted to JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
Imagine, then, that approved association with Jehovah's people MUST include acceptance of a mix of secular chronology and "Bible" chronology!!
*** w86 4/1 p. 31 Questions From Readers ***
Approved association with Jehovah’s Witnesses requires accepting the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses. What do such beliefs include?
. . .That 1914 marked the end of the Gentile Times and the establishment of the Kingdom of God in the heavens, as well as the time for Christ’s foretold presence.
*** w83 1/1 p. 12 par. 5 The Kingdom Issue to the Fore! ***
Properly, then, the ending of the Gentile Times in the latter half of 1914 still stands on a historical basis as one of the fundamental Kingdom truths to which we must hold today.
Rather than:
(2 Timothy 3:15-17) . . .. All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, so that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work.
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
The upshot of all this so far feels a little bit like a carnival side-show "cover the spot" game only worse.
You have to get the cuneiform translations correct (some argue about the translations)
You have to argue for the cuneiform documents not being altered (some argue they've been altered)
You have to download multiple pieces of software and plot and print each one so you can scrutinize them. (make sure they all have the same resolution and viewpoint)
You have to remember that weird carry the one math thing (or is it minus the one) for BCE dates when you put it into the software.
You have to assume that the software is computing all this correctly, so you'll want to get a chart of eclipses and spot check the software using eclipses in modern times and locations.
You have to assume these have correctly created the right constellations using Babylonian/Assyrian names.
Then you have to research and see if there's evidence that the intercalary months which got added, got added when and where the authorities say they got added. (not all agree)
Or you can just quote your favorite authority and go with that.
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
The upshot of all this so far feels a little bit like a carnival side-show "cover the spot" game only worse.
You have to get the cuneiform translations correct (some argue about the translations)
You have to argue for the cuneiform documents not being altered (some argue they've been altered)
You have to download multiple pieces of software and plot and print each one so you can scrutinize them. (make sure they all have the same resolution and viewpoint)
You have to remember that weird carry the one math thing (or is it minus the one) for BCE dates when you put it into the software.
You have to assume that the software is computing all this correctly, so you'll want to get a chart of eclipses and spot check the software using eclipses in modern times and locations.
You have to assume these have correctly created the right constellations using Babylonian/Assyrian names.
Then you have to research and see if there's evidence that the intercalary months which got added, got added when and where the authorities say they got added. (not all agree)
Or you can just quote your favorite authority and go with that.
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
The only way I've found any historians able to date with any certainty events in the past is when the initial recorders were accurate as to both the astronomical events these were seeing as well as the events which were occurring at the same time. Without the astronomical events you don't have any precision. Of course I'm referring to dates prior to our Common Era.
-
xero reacted to Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
In Land Surveying it works the same way in spatial location as in temporal location.
You have to have solid data in both systems to fit “System A” to “System B”, and only then can you translate and rotate so there are no gaps or overlap.
Without a solid “benchmark” in BOTH systems, your data will not match.
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
The only way I've found any historians able to date with any certainty events in the past is when the initial recorders were accurate as to both the astronomical events these were seeing as well as the events which were occurring at the same time. Without the astronomical events you don't have any precision. Of course I'm referring to dates prior to our Common Era.
-
xero got a reaction from TrueTomHarley in New Light on Beards
merry krats mikh. --- yiddish for scratch me (I studied w/a Jewish engineer who told me that one)
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
How does that work, since nothing secular has attachments to anything we can verify w/o astronomical triangulation?
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
How does that work, since nothing secular has attachments to anything we can verify w/o astronomical triangulation?
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
@JW InsiderSo you're saying they are wrong. Got it.
-
-
xero reacted to Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
….. and on a related note:
-
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
Ok, so can anyone tell me why I should prefer 568 BCE over 588 BCE when the astronomical data fully matches 588 BCE but only partially 568 BCE?
588 BCE:
https://blog.naver.com/gjinzzang/220583459010
568 BCE:
https://blog.naver.com/gjinzzang/220599019521
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
I'm not above throwing some unwarranted shade either.
-
xero got a reaction from Alphonse in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
When I see ad hominems I see a weakness. I like that. It lets me know when people have sh*tty arguments.
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
I think people who trouble themselves to own or run sites have the same kind of character that people who "start new religions" have. I don't know or care about anyone's history. To me talk about people is what tiny-minded people do. <patting my own back>Whereas the smart ones spend their time on the issues</end patting my own back>
So have you looked at the Korean guy's site yet?
-
xero got a reaction from Pudgy in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
When I see ad hominems I see a weakness. I like that. It lets me know when people have sh*tty arguments.
-
xero got a reaction from George88 in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
When I see ad hominems I see a weakness. I like that. It lets me know when people have sh*tty arguments.
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
When I see ad hominems I see a weakness. I like that. It lets me know when people have sh*tty arguments.
-
xero got a reaction from JW Insider in Trying to nail down 612 BCE as the date of Nineveh's destruction
I could give a rip about the character or motivations of anyone involved in questions of fact. I do find really, really annoying and unhelpful all this sort of meaningless chatter. It's like some stupid, stupid squirrels chasing each other around the trunk of a tree, dashing across the street and getting squished because they kept their eyes on the wrong nut.