Jack Ryan

For the majority of survivors of abuse, the new law is a welcome legal tool, but only for citizens of New York State. However, for Jehovah’s Witness victims, the legislation is far more significant. The Witness organization is headquartered in New York, which means that any and all cases from all 50 States are eligible where the Watchtower Organization is a defendant.
The key to filing such cases revolves around Watchtower’s decades-old policy in which allegations of sexual abuse are handled internally as matters of “sin”- but are rarely if ever reported to law enforcement.
---------------
As stated by New York’s Government Web Site, this new law:
Provides that the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution of a sexual offense committed against a child shall not begin to run until the child turns 23 years of age. Provides that a civil action for conduct constituting a sexual offense against a child shall be brought before the child turns 55 years of age. Revives previously barred actions related to sexual abuse of children. Grants civil trial preference to such actions. Eliminates the notice of claim requirements for such actions when the action is brought against a municipality, the state or a school district. Requires judicial training relating to child abuse and the establishment of rules relating to civil actions brought for sexual offenses committed against children. These stipulations represent landmark changes to New York laws protecting minors, which previously placed unrealistic limits on the time given for victims to come forward and report abuse, or file a civil lawsuit seeking justice.
Experts in the field now recognize that it may take 25, 30, 35 years or even longer before a victim of childhood abuse is able to disclose the crimes committed against them.

Jehovah's Witnesses in a 1968 interview _Armageddon and 1975_ London Watchtower rep speaks to BBC.mp4

is it ok for a JW fireman to rescue people from a burning church?
This is how JW's constantly think..... get real folks...

It also looks like it’s proof that the Canadian lawyer for the Watchtower perjured himself as an officer of the court to their Supreme Court

Jehovah's Witness Organization Redefines Shunning to Falsely.mp4 Every JW visiting this page should MORALLY comment below and publicly state that this JW Lawyer is LYING through his teeth to the Canadian Supreme Court.
If you don't, YOU participate in this gross sin. Because you ALL KNOW this is a false statement.
Remember as well that this JW Lawyer is also an Officer of the Court.
What the courts do not know is that JW's consider outright lying in court a part of "theocratic warfare" just like Muslims do. So it is a virtue to them.

SMH.
Can you spell P-E-R-J-U-R-Y?

Evidently this is "Normal family relations" according to Watchtower:

There is a quite a difference between a suggestion and a directive.
Was the direction given as a suggestion? So delegates were free not to wear it?
What would happen if one of them chose NOT to wear it?

@Anna 
You got me!
Really it's because I have issues stemming from decades of mind control from the JW's.... So I am not a good example.
Other people should save themselves and future generations from this radioactive titanic religious cult if they don't want their children discussing whether they are allowed to wear beards in 50 years from now.
I would rather they study science, medicine or technology and actually do something to help mankind rather than spread hate toward apostates who don't agree with their version / translation of some 5,000 year old camel riding desert sands God's words to an extinct people.

@The Librarian @JW Insider The whole idea of you guys following other men as to what is "permissible" is repugnant to people who have been taught critical thinking skills.
Science has left religion and customs of desert nomads from 5,000 years ago literally in the dust.
Time to find newer books to spend your days on.
Have you considered learning a new skill in coding? Maybe medicine / health?
Much more productive than spending your time as a people wondering if beards are ok or why you are all forced to wear suits and ties for walking down the street.
 

@Anna 
You got me!
Really it's because I have issues stemming from decades of mind control from the JW's.... So I am not a good example.
Other people should save themselves and future generations from this radioactive titanic religious cult if they don't want their children discussing whether they are allowed to wear beards in 50 years from now.
I would rather they study science, medicine or technology and actually do something to help mankind rather than spread hate toward apostates who don't agree with their version / translation of some 5,000 year old camel riding desert sands God's words to an extinct people.

Hey critical thinker, why are you on here?

What if you are ordered to do some other crazy thing like.... never use a credit card?

 

@The Librarian @JW Insider The whole idea of you guys following other men as to what is "permissible" is repugnant to people who have been taught critical thinking skills.
Science has left religion and customs of desert nomads from 5,000 years ago literally in the dust.
Time to find newer books to spend your days on.
Have you considered learning a new skill in coding? Maybe medicine / health?
Much more productive than spending your time as a people wondering if beards are ok or why you are all forced to wear suits and ties for walking down the street.
 

Women are allowed. ?

Was going to shave this morning. Then i thought WWJD?

Was going to shave this morning. Then i thought WWJD?

2019 BRD Newsletter
https://docdro.id/zCdI01Y   2019 BRD Visitor Center Newsletter https://docdro.id/WQpmfDD   2019--S-147-19-05-E https://docdro.id/Vrx3fVG