Jump to content
The World News Media

MAX GAZZE: “Sotto casa” e nata dopo una visita dei T.d.Geova


The Librarian

Recommended Posts

  • Member

 

In molti hanno chiesto a Max il significato del brano e lui cosi ha spiegato in varie interviste:
“Ho lavorato molto con mio fratello e la canzone è uscita in un giorno in cui stavamo scrivendo e hanno suonato alla porta. Erano due testimoni di Geova, gli abbiamo aperto e abbiamo ascoltato quello che avevano da dirci. E abbiamo immaginato come sarebbe andata se nessuno avesse mai aperto la porta a questi ragazzi e che a un certo punto avessero cominciato a parlare davanti ad una porta chiusa. Questo rappresenta la chiusura che c’è fra il modo laico e religioso e anche fra le varie religioni. Non credere in nulla è altrettanto difficile ed impegnativo quanto credere”.
E continua spiegando anche perché ha deciso di cambiare la parte del testo che diceva “Porto Dio”: “Non volevo che l’assonanza fosse confusa o male interpreta e per il palco del Festival ho preferito non rischiare. Sono stato ben attento a non offendere nessuno e a non volere offendere nessuno”.
La canzone è certamente un invito al dialogo tra religioni e fedi diverse ma anche, più in generale, un invito alla convivenza nel rispetto delle diversità che animano e fanno parte del nostro mondo.

girato dal regista Lorenzo Vignolo, lo stesso Max interpreta un predicatore quasi surreale che insieme al co-protagonista del video (il figlio Samuel) si aggira per le strade della periferia di Roma a bordo di una Fiat 600 Multipla. Tutto si svolge in un contesto apparentemente abbandonato, quasi decadente.

Il predicatore-Max si ferma davanti ad un portone bussando e “predicando” davanti alla porta chiusa fino a che dall’interno il nonno della famiglia si alza ad aprire. L’apertura del portone è anche una sorta di simbolica apertura delle menti degli abitanti della casa che alla fine vengono talmente rallegrati e convinti del messaggio portato dal “predicatore” che scendono in strada felici a ballare.

Insomma nelle parole, nella musica ricercata ma non troppo “aulica”, nelle immagini, un vero e proprio inno al dialogo senza nascondersi dentro le case, dentro quelle mura che a volte sappiamo e vogliamo costruire alte per proteggerci non si sa bene da chi e cosa. 
O forse dalla paura degli altri, del confronto, del sentirsi inadeguati, diversi e quindi deboli.
Se l’ispirazione del brano è data dall’incontro con alcuni testimoni di Geova, in realtà il significato appare di più ampio respiro. 
La paura del confronto verso altre religioni, altre culture ed idee politiche, altri orientamenti sessuali. Più semplicemente altre scelte di vita. Tutto viene accompagnato da un ritmo musicale brioso, leggero ma mai scanzonato, che entra in testa e nel cuore. 
E li rimane.
La sua canzone dipinge un approccio ed uno sguardo sul mondo apparentemente leggero, in realtà molto reale e profondo.

http://tdg-archivio.org/post/154868522495/max-gazze-sotto-casa-e-nata-dopo-una-visita-dei

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 3.3k
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.