Jump to content
The World News Media

Thanks all dear Brothers & Sisters ❤ I heard by Meeting, we've 250,000 Trolly's WORLDWIDE, WOW! & more...


Queen Esther

Recommended Posts

  • Member

INTREPID TRAVELLER:

We seem to have no shortage of SRPAs.

I watched the ARC, live, and SAW him say this.

We USED to call lying for political correctness craven cowardice .. . but that was my first and foremost stunned reaction .. that he was lying.

Now we have TWO choices .... one sworn under oath before Almighty God, as you quoted ....

1 hour ago, INTREPID TRAVELLER said:

Question: And do you see yourselves as Jehovah God’s spokespeople on earth?

Answer: That I think would seem to be quite presumptuous to say that we are the only spokesperson that God is using ....

Funny how the story changes when put under oath, by reasonable, rational, thinking  people who have the power to throw your SRPA butt in jail.

As Karl Childers in the movie Sling Blade put it ....

" .... Not funny 'ha-ha', funny queer. "

.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.... commenting on the Lego Brother, and the Lego Trolly Cart photo .... my tolerance for children often reached its limits when I got up in the middle of the night, barefooted and in the dark, stepped on  some Lego contraption.

When I went to restaurants, I would often ask the waitresses, "Do you serve children?"

When I got a "yes" answer, I would say " I would like two, please, with ketchup!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 5.6k
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Thank  you  so  much  all  dear  Brothers & Sisters, WORLDWIDE.... We  need  you  very  much  to  find  new  human's  for  the  Truth, for  an  everlasting  life  and  LOVE  for  our  GO

I really liked that idea the Brother made,  with the Literature Rack on the back of his red Yamaha Motorcycle ... it has the advantage of being a licensed vehicle, and the motorcycle is cargo, so no "

Is this what they call.........."your swan song"?????  

Posted Images

  • Member

"Intrepid traveller" You are what one calls an "Internet Troll"............defined as, (by Wikipedia): In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtrl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll's amusement............

My comment still stands "get a life"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
9 hours ago, John Lindsay Barltrop said:

"Intrepid traveller" You are what one calls an "Internet Troll"............defined as, (by Wikipedia): In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtrl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll's amusement............

My comment still stands "get a life"

Thank you Brother John,  but lets ignore it.... NO worth !! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 hour ago, John Lindsay Barltrop said:

Funny you should say that Queen Esther, because it was my last reply.........as you rightly said NOT worth it........after all we have much better things to do with our lives.

NO !!   NOT  yours.....   I  meant  INTREPID TRAVELLER --------

That  was  a  misunderstanding,  sorry :(

Its  now  enough  with  such  of  comments  under  my  postings....

I  like  your  nice  comments !  Thank  you  my  Brother's....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 3/22/2017 at 1:04 AM, INTREPID TRAVELLER said:

John Lindsay Barltrop ANSWER THE QUESTION STOP ATTACKING THE PERSON - A HIGHLY PRACTICED JW TRAIT !

Nonsense. You always attack the person. It is the way to go.

Of course, you do not attack him in his own house. That would be rude. You don't attack him on his own blog, for that would also be rude. Possibly, you may not even attack him on his own thread. There, if you visit, you must be polite.

But therein lies the problem for the apostate. Nobody comes to his own house or his own blog, often not even to his own thread, because he is a loser, and everyone knows it. So he comes to your house, blog, thread, to make trouble, and there, as far as I am concerned, you blast him out of the water.

Now, this is Queen Esther's thread, and Queen Esther poses as one of our people. If she is (for all are liars on the internet...in other words, don't be too gullible), then she is my spiritual sister. So she will understand it when you are not nice to one who tries to invade a loyal ones' thread with disloyal comments.

You pour coffee for your welcome visitors, but your Rottweiler takes out the thief climbing through the window. What's so hard about that?

And JTR is here too, I see. Excuse me for a moment why I hunt up some asinine, bombastic, offensive, photos.

If you get too many thieves climbing in your window, then you move to another neighborhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Dear Sister, Queen Esther..........I am not sure, but I think!!, that you may have misunderstood True Tom's comments to a degree........one of the points he was making concerning yourself, just as an example, was that anyone can, and some unfortunately do pose as someone who they really are no............it can be difficult to tell sometimes.

He also made the point that, referring to the internet troll as apostate.........they know that brothers and Sisters will not visit there web pages, blogs, etc ("or go into their homes")., so they come onto one where many Jehovah's Witnesses frequent, (like our home), with upbuilding photographs and experiences 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
20 hours ago, John Lindsay Barltrop said:

.I am not sure, but I think!!, that you may have misunderstood True Tom's comments to a degree.......

It may be that I owe Queen Esther an apology, for she posts much fine content.

If you see someone accosted by an apostate and the reaction is far afield from what you would expect it would be, it can be hard to get your head around why that would be. It is my bad, perhaps. I'll just have to work harder to get my head around it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

"It may be that I owe Queen Esther an apology, for she posts much fine content"

English is not Queen Esther's first, or primary language and sometimes she may not quite get the point of something we find easy to understand...........mind you she does do extremely well with her English postings, I THINK that she also has postings in Spanish??.........certainly much better than I could even dream of doing in any other language

.....and you are certainly right True Tom when you said that Queen Esther posts very fine content..........I think that she must spend most of her waking hours on the internet to come up with so many relevant and good points in her posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

    • Anna

      Anna 5,083

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,411

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JW Insider

      JW Insider 9,752

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Col310
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.