Jump to content
The World News Media

"He was raised up." The Lord Jesus Has Raised Up! ?


Bible Speaks

Recommended Posts

  • Member

"He was raised up."—Matt. 28:6.

24 "But on the first day of the week, they came very early to the tomb, bringing the spices they had prepared.

2 But they found the stone rolled away from the tomb, 

3 and when they entered, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus.

4 While they were perplexed about this, look! two men in shining garments stood by them. 

5 The women became frightened and kept their faces turned toward the ground, so the men said to them: “Why are you looking for the living one among the dead?

 6 He is not here, but has been raised up. Recall how he spoke to you while he was yet in Galʹi·lee, 

7 saying that the Son of man must be handed over to sinful men and be executed on the stake and on the third day rise.”

8 Then they remembered his words,

9 and they returned from the tomb and reported all these things to the Eleven and to all the rest.

10 They were Mary Magʹda·lene, Jo·anʹna, and Mary the mother of James. Also, the rest of the women with them were telling these things to the apostles. 

11  However, these sayings seemed like nonsense to them, and they would not believe the women.

12  But Peter got up and ran to the tomb, and stooping forward, he saw only the linen cloths. So he went off, wondering to himself what had occurred." (Luke24:1-12)

IMG_0069.JPG

IMG_0070.JPG

"Él fue resucitado." - Matt. 28: 6.

24 Pero el primer día de la semana llegaron muy temprano al sepulcro, trayendo las especias que habían preparado.

2 Pero hallaron que la piedra rodaba lejos del sepulcro,

3 Y cuando entraron, no hallaron el cuerpo del Señor Jesús.

4 Mientras estaban perplejos acerca de esto, ¡mira! Dos hombres con vestidos brillantes estaban junto a ellos.

5 Las mujeres se asustaron y se volvieron hacia el suelo, y los hombres les dijeron: -¿Por qué buscan al viviente entre los muertos?

 6 No está aquí, sino que ha resucitado. Recuerda cómo te habló mientras estaba todavía en Galilea,

7 diciendo que el Hijo del hombre debe ser entregado a los hombres pecadores y ser ejecutado en la hoguera y al tercer día levantarse ".

8 Entonces se acordaron de sus palabras,

9 Y volvieron del sepulcro y dijeron todas estas cosas a los once ya todos los demás.

10 Fueron María Magdalena, Joanana y María la madre de Jacobo. Además, el resto de las mujeres con ellos estaban diciendo estas cosas a los apóstoles.

11 Sin embargo, estos dichos parecían absurdos, y no creían a las mujeres.

12 Pero Pedro se levantó y corrió al sepulcro, y se inclinó hacia delante, y vio sólo los lienzos. Así que se fue, preguntándose lo que había ocurrido. "(Lucas 24: 1-12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 489
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

"He was raised up."—Matt. 28:6. 24 "But on the first day of the week, they came very early to the tomb, bringing the spices they had prepared. 2 But they found the stone rolled away from the

Posted Images





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

    • Many Miles

      Many Miles 703

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Col310

      Col310 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Anna

      Anna 5,083

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JW Insider

      JW Insider 9,752

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mic Drop

      Mic Drop 95

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • T.J

      T.J 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Col310
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.