Jump to content
The World News Media

Carlisle woman's 'amazing' work leads to business awards nomination


Guest Kurt

Recommended Posts

  • Guest
Guest Kurt

image.png

Pauline House with husband Derek

 

Spreading the word of God is all in a day's work for Pauline House.

The Carlisle businesswoman runs Bible Tours of London's British Museum from her home at Parkland Village using a network of 32 guides.

Such is the success of her enterprise that her husband Derek has nominated her in the Best Tourism and Hospitality category of this year's in-cumbria Business Awards.

Pauline, 66, set up the faith-building company as an off-shoot of Derek's Bethel coach tours business which is also run from Carlisle. The couple are both Jehovah Witnesses as are all their guides.

Derek said he nominated Pauline because of the “amazing” work she was doing with her Bible Tours venture.

“She has built up a successful team operating these inspirational tours,” said 70-year-old Derek who once ran a thriving printing firm in Carlisle.

 

“We used to run the Bible Tours as a small part of our Bethel coach trips but decided a few years ago that Pauline should run the British Museum trips as a company in its own right.”

Bible Tours – which runs its museum visits virtually every day – employs 32 guides fluent in 14 languages and attracts around 10,000 customers a year from across the world.

In his nomination Derek wrote: “The team has established itself as the foremost provider of this specialist type of tour in the British Museum, and is highly successful with high rate of growth, constantly positive cash flow and guaranteed profit.

“Customer satisfaction produces a very high rate of glowing voluntary testimonials, and in fact the staff are treated almost every day by customers to free lunch and international hospitality.

“Training is accomplished by remote tuition and dialogue as well as through some senior guides in person. It produces perfect job satisfaction for everyone involved.”

Derek sold his QIC Print company, at Durranhill in Carlisle seven years ago to concentrate on his work as a Jehovah Witness.

The Best Tourism and Hospitality award is one of 16 honours which will be handed out at an evening of celebration at the Halston Hotel in Carlisle on November 9 by BBC Media Editor Amol Rajan.

The award will recognise a business which the judges believe can demonstrate innovation, commitment and leadership resulting in the success of a tourism or hospitality enterprise.

It must fall into one of these categories – leisure, hospitality, tourism, visitor attraction or service.

Judges will be looking for:

 

  • Outstanding performance relating to commercial success and evidence of growth and investment
  • Creation of employment together with staff training and development
  • Delivery of innovations and improvements
  • Evidence of customer satisfaction

 

To enter go to www.in-cumbria.com/awards

source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 518
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

Posted Images





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Col310
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.