Jump to content
The World News Media

La única gobernadora mujer de Afganistán fue destituida y reemplazada por un hombre


Raquel Segovia

Recommended Posts

  • Member

Aunque las autoridades negaron que se trate de una cuestión de género, Masooma Muradi aseguró que "la mayoría no pudo soportar" que ella ocupe un cargo como ese. El país es uno de los peores para ser mujer, según la ONU

Masooma Muradi era la única gobernadora mujer de Afganistán y acaba de ser destituida (AFP)

Masooma Muradi era la única gobernadora mujer de Afganistán y acaba de ser destituida (AFP)

La única mujer gobernadora de Afganistán, que dirigía una provincia pobre del centro del país, fue sustituida sin explicación por un hombre, indicaron este miércoles las autoridades.

Desde su nombramiento en 2014, Masooma Muradi luchaba contra el sexismo y la hostilidad de los religiosos conservadores de su provincia, Daikundi, como contó el año pasado a la AFP.

"Confirmo que la señora Masooma Muradi ha sido sustituida en sus funciones de gobernadora. Le agradecemos sus esfuerzos", declaró a la AFP Munira Yusafzada, vocera de la dirección de la gobernación local, en Kabul.

 “Confirmo que la señora Masooma Muradi ha sido sustituida en sus funciones de gobernadora. Le agradecemos sus esfuerzos”
 

"Se trata de un procedimiento normal, no tiene nada que ver con cualquier prejuicio hacia las mujeres", aseguró Yusafzada. "Claro que había protestas contra su nombramiento en la provincia, pero éstas no tuvieron nada que ver con su sustitución", afirmó.

Muradi, reemplazada por un ex ministro de Obras Públicas y que ya no ocupa ningún cargo público, era la única mujer gobernadora del país.

El presidente Ashraf Ghani había nombrado a otra gobernadora tras su elección en 2014, en la muy conservadora provincia vecina de Ghor. Pero ésta había tenido que dejar su cargo ante la presión y las protestas de los religiosos locales.

"La gente dice ser abierta, pero la mayoría no puede soportar que una mujer ocupe un cargo como éste", declaró el año pasado Muradi, que entonces tenía 37 años. "No me dejo pisar por los hombres, y la sociedad no se espera eso de parte de una mujer", añadió.

Su marido también era objeto de comentarios sexistas. "La gente me llama su secretaria o su niñera", explicó en aquella entrevista para la AFP.

 
(Reuters)
(Reuters)

Daikundi, que tiene pocos recursos y cada año queda aislada del resto del país durante meses por culpa de la nieve, es tal vez una de las provincias afganas más difíciles de gobernar.

A pesar de algunos avances registrados desde 2001, Afganistán sigue siendo un país muy conservador y "uno de los peores lugares para ser mujer", según la ONU.

Sólo hay dos mujeres en el gobierno afgano, las ministras de Condición de la Mujer y Lucha Antidroga. En el resto de la administración territorial, hay dos dos gobernadoras de distrito (subdivisión de la provincia) y una gobernadora-adjunta de distrito.

Con información de AFP

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 284
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,670
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Apolos2000
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.