Jump to content
The World News Media

De pistas deportivas a espacio de oración


Guest Nicole

Recommended Posts

  • Guest

117462035--624x426.jpg

Ya se han iniciado los trámites para cambiar las pistas deportivas por un centro religioso. / JAVIER MARTÍN

El barrio de Aviación de Motril pelea por no perder unas históricas instalaciones a cambio de un centro de Testigos de Jehová

LAURA UBAGOMotrilMiércoles, 18 octubre 2017, 00:53

La asociación de vecinos 'Orión', del barrio de Aviación de Motril, ha emprendido una batalla para evitar perder unas históricas pistas deportivas que se convertirán -si los trámites administrativos siguen su cauce- en un centro religioso promovido por Testigos Cristianos de Jehová. Los vecinos han realizado alegaciones, junto con el PP e IU, al estudio de detalle -publicado en el BOP- para llevar a cabo el cambio de suelo que hay que realizar para construir este equipamiento. Los vecinos aseguran que estas pistas deportivas (es un suelo privado) han estado utilizándose de forma ininterrumpida de día y de noche gracias a unas torres de iluminación que instalaron los antiguos propietarios. Las pistas llevan en el barrio más de 30 años y los residentes de la zona se quejan de que los nuevos dueños las han cerrado.

Dicen los miembros de 'Orión' que tal eran y son las necesidades de instalaciones deportivas de ese barrio que el Ayuntamiento también contempló para el mismo uso el solar yuxtapuesto. «Las necesidades religiosas que puedan tener los Testigos Cristianos de Jehová solo les afectan a ellos, son una necesidad privada», alegan los vecinos que tampoco están de acuerdo con las formas del procedimiento.

«El camino para cambiar el uso del suelo -de deportivo a religioso- debe ser el cambio del PGOU y no tratar de meterlo de coladilla, por la parte trasera de la ley, con nocturnidad y alevosía, con un estudio detalle como se pretende hacer», protestan desde la asociación del barrio de Aviación.

Dentro de los argumentos de estos vecinos está que en su gran mayoría, los vecinos de la zona son «cristianos católicos y ateos. Los primeros tienen cubiertas sus necesidades en la vecina iglesia de Las Angustias y los demás no necesitamos ningún tipo de infraestructura religiosa», anotan. «En el caso de que se necesitaran más templos, mezquitas, iglesias o sinagogas, lo lógico es que se modificara el PGOU de Motril para cambiar el uso al solar yermo que existe justo al lado de la parcela de los Testigos de Jehová», expresan resaltando que en su barrio son muy necesarias instalaciones deportivas y que este tipo de actividades religiosas conllevan «una acumulación de personas y vehículos» que la estructura viaria de su barrio «no está preparada para soportar». Los vecinos dicen que se crearían problemas que se acumularían al que ya tienen con un solar privado colindante que se usa como aparcamiento público. En la alegación del PP se argumenta que en este barrio de la zona Norte de Motril existe una importante demanda de instalaciones deportivas y que «las que se pretende destruir» son las únicas en la actualidad. «Consideramos que la puesta en marcha de esta infraestructura (el centro religioso) es lo suficientemente importante como para haber informado y haberlo consensuado con los vecinos. Sin embargo, no se ha dado conocimiento a la asociación de este hecho, algo que creemos fundamental para poder realizar este proyecto», subraya Luisa García Chamorro, portavoz del PP.

En esto coincide también Izquierda Unida que resalta que en este barrio hay demanda de instalaciones deportivas y que el cambio de uso del suelo no está consensuado con los vecinos. «Como ya denunciamos, el barrio se encuentra en unas malas condiciones de mantenimiento. El cambio de uso del suelo atraería personas y vehículos que esta zona no podría soportar y se acrecentarían los problemas», alega la portavoz de IU en el Ayuntamiento, Daniela Paqué.

http://www.ideal.es/granada/costa/pistas-deportivas-espacio-20171018235845-ntvo.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 801
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Posted Images





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Col310
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.