Jump to content
The World News Media

Shunning, sinners and excommunication in JW congregations


Srecko Sostar

Recommended Posts


  • Views 3.4k
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I once heard a talk about this very thing, many years ago....what on earth does it mean? The brother gave some good insight on it that really helped shed some light on Jesus words. His explanation was

We humans can only judge what we see or hear about. Jehovah judges the heart.

I don't think any of us can claim that, and it is rather presumptuous of you if you think you can!

  • Member
39 minutes ago, Gone Fishing said:

Can you give any examples of this? and what do you define as an extraordinary sinner?

hehehehe, according to WT magazines the most dangerous sin is apostasy  and by that the most dangerous sinner is apostate. Other kind of sin and sinner are also in gradations, so WT have serious sin, gross sin and some that is considered as not so serious. If you are regular and attentive reader of WT publications you have to be familiar with this and my comments would be not so strange to you :)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
38 minutes ago, Srecko Sostar said:

according to WT magazines the most dangerous sin is apostasy  and by that the most dangerous sinner is apostate.

Heb 6: 4-6 "For as regards those who were once enlightened  and who have tasted the heavenly free gift and who have become partakers of holy spirit   and who have tasted the fine word of God and powers of the coming system of things,  but have fallen away, it is impossible to revive them again to repentance, because they nail the Son of God to the stake again for themselves and expose him to public shame" 

This could apply to apostates, but not necessarily. It can apply to anyone, it depends if they are willing to be revived or not. In practice this means that the person, whether an apostate or not, who has a change of heart has not committed the unforgivable sin because they can be revived. But if it is impossible to revive them, then that indicates they have sinned against the holy spirit and gone beyond the point of repentance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 hour ago, Gnosis Pithos said:

What’s your point?

  On 11/10/2017 at 15:23, Anna said:

We humans can only judge what we see or hear about. Jehovah judges the heart.

Gnosis you put Confused symbol on Anna's quot, And then i ask you what confusing you about her quote. And now in your comment you are talking about me and my personality but nothing about what primarily i addressed to you. What sort of problem is between us? Or you are just full of angry?

You, and some other people, gave me plenty of Downvote symbol and i had never reacted to that. I respect your and other people's emotions and decisions. But Forum has mainly purpose that people  comments emotions and thoughts and decisions. So please, continue :) 

My way of thinking, spiritual and  mental  state, and  state of soul is/are NOT to downvote any of your or other people comments. And by such behaviour I prove, give testimony in public way, that what you try to show, prove only with empty words like this one:   "You're entitled to your opinion, as much as I’m entitled to mine. If you don’t like it? that’s your problem."

I have no problem to, if feels need for that, to comment on other people's thoughts. Your Emoticon symbol is your thought, your opinion, your statement. And i comment exactly that. You chose to have false name, some kind of nickname Gnosis Pithos. My name is real name and Sre?ko have real meaning "Lucky, Happy, Felix". Your choice to introduce yourself before Forum with Gnosis, I guess, have to give to others some message, some sort of your attitude, your wishes, your hopes, your mental profile. That is nice, and why that make problem for you, if I started communicate with you by put accent on such thing? :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
35 minutes ago, Gone Fishing said:

Oh, I thought you would provide some examples from scripture.

We have plenty examples of sinful people in Bible, but as i can recall there is no signs of  classification as WT using today. If we can talking about bigger and smaller sins in OT then that would be possible as we compare sinful act and size of penalties, punishment.

But is it wise to have copy/paste method from OT for today?? If some would tell, but we have "principles" in OT, that is very manipulative. After all, did not Jesus made NEW things, new covenant, new law, new way how to practicing principles?? Didn't He teached things that are more powerful, substantially different, things that are connected with faith and love, mercy, equality, fraternity? Why to go back to deeds according to Law, Rules and Paragraphs -  when we want to rich, to get to holy spirit, more than to written or unwritten rules, traditions, laws, and similar what Clergy or priesthood try to bring again in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 hour ago, Anna said:

This could apply to apostates, but not necessarily.

I wonder if the term "apostate" is defined in too narrow a manner? Many seem to think it refers to one who was a JW at one time but who now actively camapaigns against the teachings they once defended.

Surely anyone who determinedly and willfully discards the faith and the obligations of their dedication is constituting themselves "apostate" in that they desert, abandon, or rebel against what they once stood by, be that on an intellectual, and/or moral, and/or spritual basis? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
4 hours ago, Gone Fishing said:

I wonder if the term "apostate" is defined in too narrow a manner?

Yes, possibly....

 

4 hours ago, Gone Fishing said:

Many seem to think it refers to one who was a JW at one time but who now actively camapaigns against the teachings they once defended.

Surely anyone who determinedly and willfully discards the faith and the obligations of their dedication is constituting themselves "apostate" in that they desert, abandon, or rebel against what they once stood by, be that on an intellectual, and/or moral, and/or spritual basis? 

Do you remember THIS  video? The brother there abandoned Jehovah, and became prejudiced against Jehovah's Witnesses. That is putting it nicely as no doubt at the time  it was more like enmity and active aversion judging from the context. Let me  know what you think if you watch it.

I once spoke to someone who  would have been put under the  apostate umbrella from what we understand it to mean.  He said that if he ever got into the paradise he would shoot himself. Was that just wild talk?  Or was his aversion so great that he would rather be dead? This is the point at where only Jehovah knows the answer. As for us, we can only go by what we see and hear, and we can be wrong.

So only Jehovah knows how "willful" someones discarding of the faith is. Some brothers have become so bitter because of something that happened to them to the point of  speaking against the Witnesses and Jehovah,  pretty much like the brother in the video.  But that does not automatically mean they have committed the unforgivable sin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
6 hours ago, Srecko Sostar said:

in what sense "enlightened"? only in matters of theology, doctrinal stuff?

Or writer of this words include also "body and blood" and by that improper behaviour connected to sins of flesh?  

On what thing you point Anna? 

I thought that scripture was self explanatory. Enlightened means spiritually aware, in this case becoming aware of the truth about God and his son and his purpose for the future, and doing something about it in gratitude for what he has done for us by providing the ransom.

So the apostle Paul's point was that by turning away from the truth about God and his son these people reject the the very purpose of why Jesus died, and start producing" thorns" and "thistles" (verse 8).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
3 hours ago, Anna said:

I thought that scripture was self explanatory. Enlightened means spiritually aware

Then it is enough to read the Bible and pray to God for his spirit! Bible support that!

Well Anna, i agree. But WT not support your understanding as this process alone is sufficient. In some degree we all have need to communicate with each other because "enlightening" coming on different people in various times and various circumstances. And by mutual communication (by all means, not only verbal, talking) we building our understanding and maybe spirituality. I said maybe because spirituality (in all sort of meaning not only religious) are above collected informations on this or that Bible verse, events, message....

I can find few WT texts, and some of them, where GB said how private reading the Bible, reading alone,  without leads of WT scholars can bring people back to Babylon the great and pagans beliefs.

Is it possible that reading the Bible alone can cause such damage??, Word of God would bring you or me to pagans beliefs???  

That reminds me on accusations by WT about Catholic church who do not want that laity reading the Bible and for that reason Bible was in Latin, to prevent "misunderstanding" of simple, plain, non literal people if they would read Bible alone and by that would saw how Church acting opposite to God's word. 

Very similar reasons to WT.  

Does such GB claim is TRUTH?

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,381

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JAluse

      JAluse 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • George88

      George88 556

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ComfortMyPeople

      ComfortMyPeople 544

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stephwat

      stephwat 3

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,669
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Miracle Pete
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.