Jump to content
The World News Media

WHAT IS THE DISGUSTING THING THAT CAUSES DESOLATION IN OUR TIME AS RECORDED AT MATTHEW 24:15?


JOHN DAVIS

Recommended Posts


  • Views 5.4k
  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Well, mostly to strengthen my faith and advance in the truth despite the ever changing "new light".

very good  that should all be our determination. very well

At the mo', United Nations. Man's last hope for Peace., Ha!Ha! *** w13 7/15 pp. 4-5 par. 6 “Tell Us, When Will These Things Be?” *** What will signal the start of the great tribulation? Jesus f

  • Member

 

1 hour ago, JOHN DAVIS said:

WHAT IS THE DISGUSTING THING THAT CAUSES DESOLATION IN OUR TIME AS RECORDED AT MATTHEW 24:15?

At the mo', United Nations. Man's last hope for Peace., Ha!Ha!

*** w13 7/15 pp. 4-5 par. 6 “Tell Us, When Will These Things Be?” ***
What will signal the start of the great tribulation? Jesus foretold: “When you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place, (let the reader use discernment,) then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains.” (Matt. 24:15, 16) In the first fulfillment, the “standing in a holy place” occurred in 66 C.E. when the Roman army (“the disgusting thing”) attacked Jerusalem and its temple (a place holy in the eyes of the Jews). In the larger fulfillment, the “standing” will occur when the United Nations (the modern-day “disgusting thing”) attacks Christendom (which is holy in the eyes of nominal Christians) and the rest of Babylon the Great. The same attack is described at Revelation 17:16-18. That event will be the beginning of the great tribulation.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Hello, 

I think that scripture doesn't support the notion that Christendom is attacked in the beginning of tribulation. 

Quote

*** w97 4/1 pp. 14-15 par. 5 Deliverance Into a Righteous New World ***
The “great tribulation” begins when the political elements suddenly turn on “Babylon the Great.” They “will hate the harlot and will make her devastated and naked, and will eat up her fleshy parts and will completely burn her with fire.” (Revelation 17:16)

Please note that in Rev. 17:16 there is no timing given as to the beginning of the GT.
If Christendom (aka Babylon the great) falls in the beginning of tribulation, how is it then that harlot sits on the back of the revived beast that comes out of the abyss? According to Revelation 17 the seven-headed beast goes off into destruction and then comes back out of the abyss as the 8th king which is when the harlot is depicted as riding the revived beast and immediately before God puts it into the mind of the beast to devour her. Revelation in the 11
th, 13th and 17th  chapters talk about a beast that goes into a deathlike state (aka receives a sword stroke) only to later be revived. 

Rather than the destruction of organized religion marking the commencement of the great tribulation, the tribulation apparently brings about the collapse of the present Anglo-American dominated democratic system. That is in keeping with Daniel’s prophecy, which foretells that a king of fierce countenance will bring mighty ones to ruin, as well as the sons of the kingdom. Afterwards, with the democratic nations brought low, the United Nations will be empowered to the extent of becoming a global empire (aka the 8th king).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
Quote

In the first fulfillment, the “standing in a holy place” occurred in 66 C.E. when the Roman army (“the disgusting thing”) attacked Jerusalem and its temple (a place holy in the eyes of the Jews). In the larger fulfillment, the “standing” will occur when the United Nations (the modern-day “disgusting thing”) attacks Christendom (which is holy in the eyes of nominal Christians) and the rest of Babylon the Great.

The holy place was not only holy in the eyes of Jews. It was a place where Jehovah made his name to reside. It had a room called "The Most Holy" or "The Holy of Holies" in it. It was considered holy in the eyes of Jehovah himself, because he sanctified it. So it only makes sense that holy place today is something that is considered holy by Jehovah, which is certainly not the Christendom. And since we don't have the physical temple today, it is logical to conclude that the holy place is the spiritual temple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

exactly, but the 1997 watchtower article has been updated with the article; july 15. 2013 and also the april 2016 watchtower article: what will go when gods kingdom comes? we cant determine the exact timing of the great tribulation, but with all the things happening now and also the special campaign that we are doing right now to place the article: is the world out of control, we can be sure that this is near, therefore since the united nations are standing up at this moment, it is now time to FLEE to jehovahs organization and stay there,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
3 hours ago, into the light said:

I think that scripture doesn't support the notion that Christendom is attacked in the beginning of tribulation. 

You're right, but of course that isn't the point being made.

All of Babylon the Great is "holy" from the standpoint of its supporters. All of Babylon the Great will be dismantled by the political entity of the day in harmony with Jehovah's expressed judgement.

And there is no need to bring Jehovah's estimation of what is Holy into the equation because, at the time of Jerusalem's penetration by the Roman army, he had long cast off the old temple arrangement with the success of Jesus mission to earth. In fact, the event described at Matt.27:51; Mk.15:38; Lu.23:45 33 years earlier indicated very clearly that Jehovah had stripped away the "Holy" status of that edifice. Jesus’ baptism, in 29 C.E., had already anointed, or set apart, that heavenly, spiritual reality originally represented by the Most Holy of the earthly tabernacle and of the later temple, (Hebrews 9:11, 12), and this is the temple sanctuary described at Rev 11:19 wher the missing "ark of the covenant" is finally located (figuratively of course).

So then, at the time of Jersusalem's end from 66CE to 70CE , the literal  "Holy" and "Most Holy" compartments of the temple were just relics of the past, "holy" indeed in the eyes of the adherents to the redundant Jewish religion of the time, but nevetheless as profane as any other religious eduifice of the day in the eyes of Jehovah God. Actually. it had been long marked for destruction as is Christendom and all of Babylon the Great today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

From the quote referenced by Gone Fishing, it states: “In the first fulfillment, the “standing in a holy place” occurred in 66 C.E. when the Roman army (“the disgusting thing”) attacked Jerusalem and its temple (a place holy in the eyes of the Jews).”

The early temples had become holy since it was “God’s house”; where His Spirit dwelled. (Matt 21:12,13)  

“Thus Solomon finished the house of the Lord and the king’s house; and Solomon successfully accomplished all that came into his heart to make in the house of the Lord and in his own house. Then the Lord appeared to Solomon by night, and said to him: “I have heard your prayer, and have chosen this place for Myself as a house of sacrifice.” 2 Chron 7:11,12

“When Solomon had finished praying, fire came down from heaven and consumed the burnt offering and the sacrifices; and the glory of the Lord filled the temple. And the priests could not enter the house of the Lord, because the glory of the Lord had filled the Lord’s house.” 2 Chron 7:1,2

Only his appointed priesthood was allowed to serve within it.  The history of abominations “in the holy place” always referred to the desecration of God’s “house”, as well as the acts of his own people – not from nations who were not under covenant with Him. Deut. 29:17,18; 1 Kings 11:4-6; Ezek 8:10; Jer 44:4; 7:30,34; 2:4,7,11,12; 6:15; 4:1,4;8:12

So, why would the Watchtower deflect attention away from the spiritual Temple within their own midst; that being, the anointed ones? 1 Pet 2:5,9; 1 Cor 3:16,17; Eph 2:20-22 Because the “disgusting thing”/”abomination” is found in the organization in the form of the elder body “representing the royal priesthood”.

@into the light  said, “So it only makes sense that holy place today is something that is considered holy by Jehovah, which is certainly not the Christendom. And since we don't have the physical temple today, it is logical to conclude that the holy place is the spiritual temple.”

That is totally correct.  The spiritual temple is found among, and in, the anointed ones.

1 Cor 3:16,17 –  “Do you not know that temple you are the of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?   If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are.

“And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God. As God has said: “I will dwell in them And walk among them. I will be their God, And they shall be My people.”

Matt 24:15 - “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—”

Dan 12:11 -  “And from the time that the daily sacrifice is taken away, and the abomination of desolation is set upthere shall be one thousand two hundred and ninety days.

The “abomination” eliminates the “daily sacrifice” made by God’s appointed priests. ( 1 Pet 2:5,9 )  No one has successfully usurped God’s priesthood and not paid the consequences.   Num 16:3-11,18,20,21,35,40  

 https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/topic/50063-the-role-of-the-anointed-ones-in-the-last-days/

 https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/topic/48218-gods-house/

https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/topic/32169-anointed-ones-and-jworg/?tab=comments#comment-68682

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
16 hours ago, JOHN DAVIS said:

WHAT IS THE DISGUSTING THING THAT CAUSES DESOLATION IN OUR TIME AS RECORDED AT MATTHEW 24:15? 

We know exactly what it is. In Luke's account Jesus paralleled it with the encroachment of Rome around the city of Jerusalem.

  • (Luke 21:20-24) 20 “However, when you see Jerusalem surrounded by encamped armies, then know that the desolating of her has drawn near. . . .24 And they will fall by the edge of the sword and be led captive into all the nations; and Jerusalem will be trampled on by the nations until the appointed times of the nations are fulfilled.

Rome would ultimately destroy the city and temple itself, the seat of the very earthly organization that had represented Jehovah's holy people, his holy nation. The Bible never says that there is a second fulfillment, but it doesn't have to. We know from the rest of scripture that the application is for all of us to continue to be on the watch, because the worldly powers continue to encroach upon us. The end can come at any time, and waiting on some specific action to occur with the United Nations or some other entity could end up misleading us if we are trying to "divine" how close the end is based on what happens to worldly entities around us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.