Jump to content
The World News Media

Gérmenes en tránsito: el lugar más sucio de un aeropuerto no es el baño


Raquel Segovia

Recommended Posts

  • Member

Investigadores analizaron las superficies de tres grandes aeropuertos de Estados Unidos y descubrieron cuáles son los rincones menos limpios. Cuáles son los recaudos que hay que toma

¿Cuál es el lugar más sucio del aeropuerto? (Getty)

Cuál es el lugar más sucio del aeropuerto? (Getty)

No es extraño que luego de volver de unas vacaciones, las personas caigan enfermas, en especial si viajaron a un lugar frío y llegan a uno cálido, y transitaron por varios aeropuertos internacionales y en aviones atiborrados, donde los microbios abundan, y los gérmenes proliferan libremente entre tanto tráfico humano.

En el 2016, un estudio llevado a cabo por Travelmath reveló que los lugares más sucios de una nave son la hebilla del cinturón de seguridad, el botón de descarga del inodoro, las salidas de aire de cada asiento y, en primer lugar, la bandeja donde se come. Sin embargo, un nuevo informe se propuso ahora analizar cuál es el rincón más asqueroso del aeropuerto.

 
Según el reporte, los lugares menos limpios de los aeropuertos son las máquinas de auto check-in (Getty)
Según el reporte, los lugares menos limpios de los aeropuertos son las máquinas de auto check-in (Getty)

Según el reporte realizado por InsuranceQuotes.com, los lugares menos limpios de los aeropuertos son las máquinas de auto check-in -que hoy en día abundan en la mayoría de las terminales para agilizar el proceso-. Es más, según la investigación, aquí hay 200 veces más de gérmenes que en el asiento del inodoro de una casa.

 

Los investigadores llevaron a cabo 18 tests en seis superficies de tres grandes aeropuertos de Estados Unidos, y luego promediaron la cantidad de unidades formadoras de colonias (UFC) por cada pulgada cuadrada (6,4516 centímetros cuadrados). Según sus hallazgos, en promedio cada pantalla de check-in contenía 253.857 UFC por pulgada cuadrada.

 
Hay 200 veces más de gérmenes que en el asiento del inodoro de una casa (Getty)
Hay 200 veces más de gérmenes que en el asiento del inodoro de una casa (Getty)

Pero estos monitores no son los únicos lugares infestados. Los apoyabrazos de los asientos donde se espera antes de embarcar y los botones de los bebederos se posicionaron en el segundo y en el tercer puesto respectivamente. Según los investigadores, estos sitios son más sucios que la pileta de la cocina de una casa, que estudios demostraron que es uno de los lugares menos limpios del hogar.

El estudio también analizó, como ya habían hecho en Travelmath, los rincones más asquerosos del avión, y en este caso el más sucio resultó ser el botón de descarga del inodoro, luego las bandejas para la comida, seguidos por las hebillas del cinturón de seguridad de cada asiento.

 
Las bandejas donde se apoya la comida son unas de las sueprficies más sucias de un avión (iStock)
Las bandejas donde se apoya la comida son unas de las sueprficies más sucias de un avión (iStock)

Estos objetos con los que los pasajeros se encuentran en constante contacto no se esterilizan lo suficiente debido a que las limpiezas entre vuelo y vuelo suelen ser cada vez más cortas para rebajar los costos y que el avión esté más tiempo en el aire. Sin embargo, el estudio de Travelmath demostró que en los baños se encontraron algunas de las superficies más limpias del avión, a pesar de la creencia popular, sin contar, por supuesto, el botón de descarga. Esto se debe a que debido a su uso continuo y a la cantidad de gérmenes que pasan por aquí, son los lugares esterilizados con mayor frecuencia en los aviones.

La presencia de gérmenes no significa que necesariamente el pasajero se enfermará pero, para los que prefieren protegerse, se recomienda usar en gel antes y después de utilizar las máquinas de auto check-in y los otros sitios mencionados, además de evitar comer cualquier alimento que haya estado en contacto directo con la bandeja de un avión.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 291
  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,670
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Apolos2000
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.