Jump to content
The World News Media

? Jesus RECEBE, em Isaías 9:6, o título de "Deus Poderoso”, isso tem significância real em inferir a Jesus a Onipotência, como muitos argumentam? Não!


I want see you in paradise

Recommended Posts

  • Member

? Jesus RECEBE, em Isaías 9:6, o título de "Deus Poderoso”, isso tem significância real em inferir a Jesus a Onipotência, como muitos argumentam?

Não.

Jesus assim é chamado por que RECEBEU muito poder e autoridade de Seu Deus e Pai Jeová.

? O título “Deus poderoso” no Hebraico é El Gib·bóhr, e essa palavra também é aplicada a homens de destaque.

? "Do interior do Sheol, da sepultura, os VALENTES PODEROSOS [ El Gib·bóhr ] líderes receberão o Egito e todos os seus aliados, dizendo: ‘Eis que eles desceram e jazem com os incircuncisos, com os que foram mortos ao fio da espada!’ [ Ezequiel 33:22 JFA ]

Guerreiros foram chamados de Deuses Poderosos, e será que alguém diria que eles formam parte do Deus Onipotente também? Não.

'El Gib·bóhr' não é termo de poder absoluto como "El shadday" é.

? Jesus não é chamado de “Deus Todo Poderoso”, [ em Hebraico 'El Shadday' ], título aplicado exclusivamente a Jeová em toda a Bíblia Sagrada. [ Gênesis 17:1 foto ]

Um único texto que chamasse Jesus pelo título "El Shadday" [ ou Pantokrator em grego ], o colocaria como Todo Poderoso, só que isso não ocorre nem uma única vez na Bíblia.

? SOMENTE o Pai é apresentado com títulos absolutos.

? Jesus NUNCA foi chamado de "El shaday, título supremo absoluto, mas foi chamado, no máximo, por um título de poder relativo CONCEDIDO.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=788572708003814&id=328214527372970

FB_IMG_1519999303245.jpg

FB_IMG_1519999310069.jpg

FB_IMG_1519999316697.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 403
  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Member

? Em adição ao post que fizemos explicando que em Isaías 9:6 Jesus é retratado como RECEBENDO o título de Deus Forte, um título também aplicado a homens, o que não provaria a onipotência de Cristo, veja:

? Denúncia:

? A Bíblia KJA King James Atualizada tendenciosamente, TROCOU a palavra Hebraica  El Gib·bóhr [ Deus Poderoso ] por El Shaday, que significa Deus Todo Poderoso e somente se aplica a Jeová.

Se a trindade é uma doutrina tão clara na Bíblia, porque é necessário esse tipo de adulteração para apoia-lá? 

LAMENTÁVEL!

E que tal ler o versículo seguinte e observar o PORQUE Jesus RECEBEU os títulos e porque Jesus tem uma posição enaltecida?

? "Ele será descendente do rei Davi; o seu poder como rei se multiplicará sobremaneira, e haverá plena paz em todo o seu Reino. As bases do seu governo serão a verdade e a justiça, desde agora e para sempre, o zelo o Yahweh, o SENHOR dos Exércitos, FARÁ COM QUE ISSO SE REALIZE!"
[ Isaías, 9:7 ]

Jesus detém poder e todos esses títulos por que
J E O V Á   F E  Z ! 

Deus quis que Jesus tivesse todos os seus atributos e a plenitude [ Colocensses 1:19 ]

? Não, em nenhum mundo possível, o Onipotente necessita RECEBER atributos.

? Não adianta tais doutrinas forçarem o entendimento. Isso é vexatório!

FB_IMG_1520000355237.jpg

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=788683701326048&id=328214527372970

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,380

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JW Insider

      JW Insider 9,694

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • xero

      xero 2,295

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,669
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Miracle Pete
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.