By
Bible Speaks
in Topics
-
Similar Content
-
- 24 replies
- 2,124 views
-
By the way .... has the Society recently decided that voting is a matter of personal conscience? 1 2 3
- voting
- conscience
- (and 7 more)
- 24 replies
- 3,381 views
-
In a letter sent to Defense Sec. Esper, Sen. Wyden requested a review of the Voatz voting app.
By TheWorldNewsOrg,
- voatz
- electronic voting
- (and 2 more)
- 0 replies
- 241 views
-
Watch the voting machine used in US swing states get hacked to rig an election.
By TheWorldNewsOrg,
- voting
- voting machines
- (and 1 more)
- 2 replies
- 400 views
-
The Implications of Two MAJOR Watchtower Confessions
By Witness,
- neutrality
- changed doctrine
- (and 3 more)
- 1 reply
- 679 views
-
- 52 replies
- 6,245 views
-
- 2 replies
- 496 views
-
- 20 replies
- 396 views
-
- 0 replies
- 686 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1,234 views
-
TEENAGE WITNESSES EXPELLED FOR THEIR FAITH RETURN TO SCHOOL
By Guest Nicole,
- 0 replies
- 987 views
-
- 124 replies
- 8,417 views
-
- 0 replies
- 925 views
-
Una de las asambleas en Malawi, en esta asistieron 4500 y se bautizaron 56 Testigos de Jehová
By Guest Nicole,
- 0 replies
- 1,202 views
-
- 0 replies
- 840 views
-
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Popular Contributors
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated. It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different. -
-
In the era of the Bible Students within the Watchtower, there were numerous beginnings. It is essential to bear in mind that each congregation functioned autonomously, granting the Elders the freedom to assert their own assertions and interpretations. Most people embraced the principles that Pastor Russell was trying to convey. You could argue that what you are experiencing now, they also experienced back then. The key difference is that unity was interpreted differently. Back then it had value where today there is none. To address your inquiry, while I cannot recall the exact details, it is believed to have been either 4129 or 4126. Some groups, however, adopted Ussher's 4004. It is worth mentioning that they have now discarded it and revised it to either 3954 or 3958, although I personally find little interest in this matter. I believe I encountered this information in the book titled "The Time is at Hand," though it may also be referenced in their convention report. Regardless, this is part of their compelling study series 3. Please take a moment to review and confirm the date. I am currently focused on Riblah. The Bible Students who firmly believe that Israel is the prophetic sign of Armageddon have made noteworthy adjustments to their chronology. They have included significant dates such as 1947/8 and 1967/8, as well as more recent dates. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that, according to their calculations, 2024 holds immense importance. The ongoing tension of Iran targeting Israel directly from its own territory amplifies the gravity of the situation. If their trajectory continues, the subsequent captivating event will occur in 2029, rather than as previously speculated, in 2034 by some. -
Would it be too much to ask what was the bible students starting point of creation?
-
@JW Insider Your summary is irrelevant, as I do not make any assertions regarding BC/AD other than their usage by scholars and in history, as you yourself have also acknowledged on numerous occasions, thus rendering your point invalid and evasive. The Watchtower leverages external viewpoints, including secular evidence, to substantiate the accuracy of their chronological interpretations. There are numerous approaches to dating events. Personally, I explore various alternative methods that lead to the same conclusion as the Watchtower. However, the most captivating approach is to utilize secular chronology to arrive at the same outcome. By relying solely on secular chronology, the pattern still aligns, albeit with a distinct interpretation of the available data. Nevertheless, the ultimate result remains unchanged. This is why when you get upset, when you are proven wrong, you, Tom, and those with the authority to ban take action, because you like others cannot handle the truth. In this case, your infamous tablet VAT 4956 has become useless in this situation. I do agree with you on one thing: you are not an expert, just like COJ. However, I must admit that this foolish individual was not the first to debate the chronology with the Watchtower and abandon it based on personal beliefs. He simply happened to be the most recent one that's on record.
-
-
Members
-
Recent Status Updates
-
Hello Twyla, when will the weekly study material be available. I am a member.· 1 reply
Janice Lewis lewisjanice84@gmail.com
Thank you
-
Hi Twyla,· 0 replies
When will the meeting material for week com Monday 11th March 2024 be available?
You normally post it the week before, normally on a Thursday.
Please let me know if there is any problem.
Best Regards
Chloe
-
-
-
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics65.4k
-
Total Posts159.3k
-
-
Member Statistics
Recommended Posts