Jump to content
The World News Media

The Russian government has sent the European court of human rights (Echr) to the European court of human rights (Echr) objections in the case, "


Bible Speaks

Recommended Posts

  • Member

The Russian government is responding to the European court of human rights.
Our organization had sued this government for the pursuit of our religion. We copy the complete article understandable to what the Russian government is responding to. In my life I've seen more lie per square meter.
________________________
The Russian government has sent the European court of human rights (Echr) to the European court of human rights (Echr) objections in the case, "Jehovah's witnesses in Russia" and its leader vasily kalin, who at the end of last year complained of the Illegal settlement of a religious organization and the seizure of witnesses of the property complex located in the elite district of st. Petersburg, which costs about 2 billion rubles. According to the Russian authorities, the elimination of the organization of Jehovah's witnesses was a " positive obligation of the state."

Russia says that Jehovah's witnesses appeal to the echr inadmissible. Article 17 of the European convention on the violation of the rights of the applicants - and asked to deny them. " the liquidation of a religious organization " the administrative centre of Jehovah's witnesses in Russia " was carried out under the provisions of existing legislation, interference with the applicant was proportionate to the legitimate objectives pursued and necessary in a democratic society ", - he declared in the Russian government's objections. At the same time, according to the document, the elimination of Jehovah's witnesses is not simply a right " the positive obligation of the state."

The government also draws attention to the echr of the fact that the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) and the appeals board of the armed forces there is no specific prohibition or restriction of the teachings of Jehovah's witnesses. In addition, Russia said that the applicant has not provided in the complaint that the data about when and how it was owned was confiscated according to the bc decision to liquidate the "Jehovah's witnesses in Russia" and consider the " Non-reasonable " and " Abstract " statements on the value of ownership - " tens of millions ".

Representative of Jehovah's witnesses artur leontyev considers the chances of winning the case in the echr as a " big ". " the arguments put forward by the Russian authorities in their comments, have already been done - in other similar cases, the Echr and evaluate them, take a decision in favour of the applicants and deny Russia. For example, an attempt to present the situation of the Russian authorities so that people can continue to practise their faith individually, does not hold: they already have practice of attracting people to justice.

Religious organization "Administrative Centre of Jehovah's witnesses in Russia" and its nearly 400 regional offices were abolished in April last year by the supreme court, in the administrative statement addressed to the ministry of justice. According to the ministry of justice, the activities of Jehovah's witnesses did not meet the goals and objectives, declared in the statutes and federal law violated, in particular, the "Anti-extremism" Act. , the materials about 100 of the Jehovah's witnesses distributed have been recognized by the courts as an extremist (" how life arose?", " learn in the school of ministry," and so sucesivamente. d) and are included On the federal list of extremist materials. Prosecutors have 13 subjects received RF 18 warnings to the regional offices of the religious organization "for extremism and the spread of extremist materials". and some offices of the Lord have been liquidated by the courts.

In the RF armed forces, the representatives of the accused denied the charges against Jehovah's witnesses. In addition, they stated that if the demand of the ministry of justice was met, the provisions of the European convention guaranteeing freedom of religion and freedom of association would be violated. However, the armed forces agreed with the arguments of the administrative claimant and, in addition to the liquidation, decided to convert the property of the organization into state ownership. In July 2017, the supreme court of appeal recognized this decision as legitimate and justified.

In the same year, the st. Petersburg District Court, at the request of The Supervisory Authority has paid the property of Russia property complex in the elite neighborhood of the capital of the north - the people of solar and is owned by a Legal person "Watchtower" (Watch Tower Bible and mathematical society of Pennsylvania, United States). Uu. ), the main organization of Jehovah's Jehovah's witnesses. It consists of two plots of land and 14 buildings, houses and offices, cadastral value of which is about 850 million rubles., and commercial, according to Jehovah's witnesses, around 2 A billion rubles., including the equipment in the building. This decision was confirmed by the court of appeal of the st. Petersburg municipal court in early may of this year.

In the autumn of last year, "the administrative center of Jehovah's witnesses in Russia" and its leader vasily kalin an appeal to the echr, bearing in mind that the Russian authorities had violated the European Convention: Art. 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion), art. 11 (freedom of assembly and association), art. 14 (Prohibition of discrimination) and art. 1 OF PROTOCOL 1 to the European Convention (protection of property). The echr communicated the complaint and invited the government of the Russian Federation to answer questions thereon.

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3650664

Translated from Russian 

B98AA5F5-000D-4DD4-917C-D7FF8E19DD93.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 661
  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The Russian government is responding to the European court of human rights. Our organization had sued this government for the pursuit of our religion. We copy the complete article understandable to

Maybe  better merged  to  the  RUSSIAN  topic...

This article is virtually incomprehensible!

Posted Images





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
    • One issue with historian Flavius Josephus is that he suggests that the Royal Captain of the (Guard) can also be regarded as General Nebuzaradan. A confusion arises from Josephus' account of the captives mentioned in Jeremiah, as he claims that they were taken from Egypt instead of Babylon. Since Nebuchadnezzar was occupied in Rilah, he directed his generals to lay siege to Jerusalem. This could potentially account for the numerous dispatches that Nebuchadnezzar would have sent to the west, but the considerable distance to Borsippa still poses a challenge. As a result, the Babylonians managed to gain control of regions such as Aram (Syria), Ammon, and Moab. The only territories that remained were the coastal cities, where the Egyptians held sway. King Josiah decided to form an alliance with Babylon instead of being under Egyptian rule. So, that part of the territory was covered until King Josiah was defeated.  It's interesting how they started back then in 4129, but still end up with the same conclusion with Zedekiah's Defeat 3522 607 B.C. 3419 607 B.C. even though their AM is different.  
  • Members

    • BTK59

      BTK59 185

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,407

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.3k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.