Jump to content
The World News Media

Why do the elders have to announce when a publisher decides to spend 70 hours a month in service?


Guest Nicole

Recommended Posts

  • Member
54 minutes ago, JOHN BUTLER said:

You only kid yourself if you think God is 'working with' the GB / JW Org or the Watchtower. 

He works with them very well indeed, just like he worked with the ‘earthen vessels’ of the first century.

One cannot shoot oneself in the foot more decisively than by insisting, ‘If it is not perfect, then it is filthy.’

What! Because you and your friends are trying to take them down means that God is not working with them? There is not one writer in the Christian Greek Scriptures who does not devote attention to ‘the burning that is taking place among you’. (1 Peter 4:12)

https://www.tomsheepandgoats.com/2019/01/who-are-the-apostates.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 6.2k
  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

. “When you give … do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing” (Matthew 6:3) Matthew 6:1 (BBE) Take care not to do your good works before men, to be seen by them Matthew 6:

Josue2 You are obviously trying to share information which may be valuable. How about I make a deal with you .... you write in English, and I will not reply in Klingon? Otherwise, your

Oh they do you know. You did!

Posted Images

  • Member
1 hour ago, TrueTomHarley said:

He works with them very well indeed, just like he worked with the ‘earthen vessels’ of the first century.

One cannot shoot oneself in the foot more decisively than by insisting, ‘If it is not perfect, then it is filthy.’

What! Because you and your friends are trying to take them down means that God is not working with them? There is not one writer in the Christian Greek Scriptures who does not devote attention to ‘the burning that is taking place among you’. (1 Peter 4:12)

https://www.tomsheepandgoats.com/2019/01/who-are-the-apostates.html

Oh dear here he goes again, jumping on that band wagon of comparing the GB and it's Org, to  the Apostles that were INSPIRED OF GOD.

Can you please show me word for word where on this forum I said  ‘If it is not perfect, then it is filthy.’

Because in fact TOM i think those have always been your words, not mine.

Maybe i should re-quote the words of Jesus  Matthew 7 v 11

Therefore, if you, although being wicked, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more so will your Father who is in the heavens give good things to those asking him!

So why hasn't  your GB asked God for these good things, so that the GB could then pass them on to the congregation ?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I  notice that @TrueTomHarley didn't answer on my comment, regarding his comment of

Quote Tom "If one is witnessing for Jehovah, then that person is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses because he or she is doing what the name says. Why should that be so hard to understand?"

Actually Tom, you have made a fantastic loophole. You are saying that anyone that witnesses about 'Jehovah' is one of Jehovah's witnesses. 

Come on Tom, don't hide away. If i am witnessing about Jehovah, then am I one of Jehovah's Witnesses ? 

It seems to follow your logic. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
3 hours ago, JOHN BUTLER said:

Come on Tom, don't hide away. If i am witnessing about Jehovah, then am I one of Jehovah's Witnesses ? 

Oh, for crying out loud! You think you have found a ‘gotcha’ do you?

If ones leave Jehovah’s earthly organization and still wishes to call themselves Jehovah’s Witnesses because they say they are still witnessing for Jehovah, be my guest—they are perfectly welcome to do so.

In no time at all, however, they will be witnessing for Yahweh, because the name Jehovah is associated with those they don’t like. Soon thereafter, they will be witnessing for The LORD, because people keep giving them the fisheye when they say ‘Yahweh.’ After that they will stop witnessing altogether, because it is hard, they find themselves unsupported, and they have also lost the thread of what to talk about.

That is the pattern that is seldom deviated from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
10 minutes ago, TrueTomHarley said:

Oh, for crying out loud! You think you have found a ‘gotcha’ do you?

If ones leave Jehovah’s earthly organization and still wishes to call themselves Jehovah’s Witnesses because they say they are still witnessing for Jehovah, be my guest—they are perfectly welcome to do so.

In no time at all, however, they will be witnessing for Yahweh, because the name Jehovah is associated with those they don’t like. Soon thereafter, they will be witnessing for The LORD, because people keep giving them the fisheye when they say ‘Yahweh.’ After that they will stop witnessing altogether, because it is hard, they find themselves unsupported, and they have also lost the thread of what to talk about.

That is the pattern that is seldom deviated from.

I'm only repeating your own wordsTom. 

Quote "If one is witnessing for Jehovah, then that person is one of Jehovah’s Witnesses because he or she is doing what the name says. Why should that be so hard to understand?"

I would not want to call myself one of Jehovah's Witnesses, not with the stigma now attached to them. And now the GB actually admit to not being inspired, then what is the point of being led by just ordinary men that don't  know the truth ? 

But regarding witnessing and your point of  "they have also lost the thread of what to talk about."  Is that why the GB and writing dept' keep making up new stuff ? Just to give JW's something to talk about. 

In the wilderness they were given mana. That was all they needed. Of course they complained etc, but all they actually needed was mana. So it is with God's written word, all that is needed is a true Anointed body of men inspired of Holy Spirit to teach the congregation from God's written word. No need of book after book after book, of which most of the writing is either lies or distorted half truth. No need for monthly magazines which hype little points from the bible and blow it all out of proportion. No need for those really stupid videos. Is God's word not enough for JW's ?

Never mind Tom. Keep advertising your books for your little bit of fame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Quote the Kid "What does that tell the readers. If you're not willing to support leaders, and governments by your standards, then you're not willing period, since every structured religious authority and secular authority is false in your eyes. "

to support leaders, and governments : Well I live within the law and pay my dues. So in that way I obey the government, even if  i don't support them. Christians are no part of this world, so I'm not supposed to support a secular government anyway. 

Leaders : A Christian should only have one leader, Christ. Christ has been given all authority and power by God. Why would a Christian want any other leader ? 

If there were truly inspired Anointed they would only be passing on the message from Christ, so a Christian would still only be led by Christ. In the first century the Apostles were only messengers serving God through Christ. Remember even the Angels were only messengers from God. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
8 hours ago, JOHN BUTLER said:

I  notice that @TrueTomHarley didn't answer on my comment....Come on Tom, don't hide away. If i am witnessing about Jehovah, then am I one of Jehovah's Witnesses ? 

If I “hide away” at your comment—which I have since addressed—then I notice that you run like a scared rabbit at mine.

When you say you will be satisfied only with a “true” anointed and I say you won’t, I notice you do not answer that. Why not?

Because you know that what I pointed out is true—if the “true” anointed is anything like the true anointed of the first century, they will make adjustments to changing times and circumstances. They will make some mistakes. They will give evidence of human imperfection. As soon as they do, you will rail against them as LIARS, because that is your pattern. There is no reason to think that it would change.

Why did you “hide away” at that remark, John?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

TTH:

I understand Luigi .... from Chicago ( with the facial scars that never heal ...) is looking for both you AND John Butler. He is uncluttered with the vagaries of civilization, and he considers it a mission from God to do something with rails, to liars.

He can just barely read at a third grade level, so both you and John may want to avoid confusing him by being obtuse, or evasive with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@TrueTomHarley Quote  "When you say you will be satisfied only with a “true” anointed and I say you won’t, I notice you do not answer that. Why not?

Well you haven't asked a question there have you ? You've  made a statement .

When you say you will be satisfied only with a “true” anointed and I say you won’t,

All you've done is disagree with me, and that is fine by me. But I don't see anything to answer. 

As you well know, the true Anointed of the 1st century could and did prove that they were inspired of God's Holy Spirit. 

They had special 'gifts' from God through Christ. 

Quote " As soon as they do, you will rail against them as LIARS, because that is your pattern. There is no reason to think that it would change. "

Why did you “hide away” at that remark, John?

Once again that is a statement. It is not a question that needs an answer. It is your opinion. And I am not in the least interested in changing your opinion of me. I do find it rather 'interesting' to listen to a person that calls himself a JW, to listen to his attitude and judgement of others (me). But there, you did say that you and Bily will get along just fine. And Billy thinks I'm due for total destruction with no chance of forgiveness from God or Christ. So it seems you and Billy are good at ignoring scripture when it suits both of you. Something to do with a rafter i think .... 

But as for the true Anointed, they will of course be humans and imperfect. But I gave an answer on this point before, where by Jesus said 'You although being wicked, know how to give good gifts to your children'. 

And the point Jesus made was that if those wicked ones asked God for good gifts then God would give them. Hence the true Anointed would be inspired by God and would ask for truth from God through Christ. The Anointed would receive truth from God through Christ and would then pass it on to the congregation of God people here on earth. 

What is so difficult about that, that you cannot understand ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • … and donchew forget now … the GB now allows Sisters to come to meetings and go out in field service in slacks or Mumus.  Or slacks AND Mumus, if poundage appropriate. Did I ever mention I once dated a Sister that made Mumus out of parachutes? She was an Opera singer, and had a UN diplomatic passport. She was on “speed”, couldn’t blink, and typed 600 words a minute with 100% errors. Occasionally she would get lipstick in her eyebrows.  
    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,680
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Col310
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.