Jump to content
The World News Media

Jehovah’s Witnesses: Members Must Reject COVID-19 Plasma Treatment… Or Else


Patiently waiting for Truth

Recommended Posts


  • Views 4.8k
  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You are a sick lady to say such a thing.  I'd better stop at that. 

I quote 4jah2me "it seems crazy to let yourself die" ...... well ..... jesus allowed himself to die in loyalty to his father......  4jah2me obviously sees something seriously SICK in that!......... or

How does this make any sense to average jws?  ............................ Try not to underestimate the Average JWs....many have and are working things out...but they are also working out so

Posted Images

  • Member
5 hours ago, Anna said:

But the question is: is pork protein different from beef protein

My brother is the scientist. I learnt to do blood tests at the institute where he was a toxicologist (43 years ago)

I took blood from about 5 sheep every day for testing......using the same syringe on each sheep - no disinfection of  the syringe was necessary. We tested for liver damage regarding their diet. No infection on any of them the next day.

Once a week we did a blood test on one small pig.  I boiled the syringe before every use and drew blood.  By the next Friday the mark where the needle entered was still there.  Pigs get infections very quickly  - their flesh is the closest to humans.

After this excercise I realized why jehovah gave the law about pork to the Israelites.

According to 1 cor 15..... the flesh of  animals, birds, fish  is different. I presume mammals are the same....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I am not a scientist, but I know similar material is made up of the same building blocks, so it figures that all meat, in other words muscle fibre is made up of the same types of building blocks (protein molecules) to a lesser or greater degree. So my point was, both pork and beef, or any other meat, when broken down to its simplest form, will be the same....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
12 hours ago, Arauna said:

Once a week we did a blood test on one small pig.  I boiled the syringe before every use and drew blood.  By the next Friday the mark where the needle entered was still there.  Pigs get infections very quickly  - their flesh is the closest to humans.

I came inside the house to get my van keys to get my tools and work on the fence, but I feel like having an asperger's syndrome attack, as the keys were next to my laptop keyboard, open to the Archive.

I will know more when I finish.

About your post in general, that's why when I get a wound, I do not disinfect or bandage it unless it's important not to offend anyone while bleeding. My theory is that the bleeding will mechanically wash out the majority of harmful bacteria and dirt, rust, or whatever, and whatever bacteria is left over will act as an impromptu vaccination.. If the wound gets red and inflamed, that is a good sign that forces are being marshaled to the area. If it spreads, I will use alcohol, or gasoline.

I once had a chain saw jump back on me and cut my left index finger tip, just above the first joint, almost completely off. ( My stupidity, for trying to cut a hole with the "point" of the chain saw, which I knew better, but like most men, have delusions of immortality ...)

I put the fingertip back on, getting blood all over me, the ground, my clothes, and the chain saw, and held it in place for awhile,  Then I duct-taped it in place and went on with my work. Meanwhile my eldest son came home, and seeing the bloody mess, exclaimed "what happened!". I explained that Dad was being stupid, and don't be stupid like me, and showed him my duct taped finger.

It healed back perfectly, except at a slight 15 degree or so angle, and I still have full feeling in the fingertip, which took about three years to fully return.

The point of this shaggy-dog story is that I agree with our assessment, based on hard evidence.

I also have a blind dog that also has diabetes, and we giver her two insulin shots a day, from the same needle, 12 hours apart, and she has never gotten an infection, even though we do not "prep" the injection site, injecting right through her fur.

As far as pig flesh being closest to humans, an older Brother I knew from many years ago, had a pig replacement heart valve, and it is my understanding that among those who have eaten human flesh, they write that it tastes so much like ham, that it is commonly referred to as "Long Pig". 

I suppose that those in Jerusalem who ate humans when the city was under siege, and they were starving (presumably war dead who bled out (?)) had a lot of experience with such things before it was over.

According to Jehovah's stated comments and directives on the matter, although he lamented the desperation of those starving who to preserve their own lives ate those that died, he never prohibited it in any way, shape, or form.  To the best of what is actually written about the subject, Jehovah has no objection to us eating human flesh ... but recognizes the general taboo cultural abhorrence of the practice.

Of course, his prohibition on blood is crystal clear, by directive, and in many related examples of his jealous ownership of all hemoglobin based blood from atmospheric air breathers ( not fish, as an example... which were never "bled", before eating.) as his exclusive personal property.

It is interesting how the general population, adhering to their cultural acclimation ... thinks exactly the opposite.of what Jehovah actually had written.

But then again ... never in the history of civilization has the majority in any group of people EVER been right.

A good example is the six trillion dollar fantasy that is the coronavirus epidemic.

So far .... 55,000 deaths have been attributed to this ... but to keep the free money flowing, they even count traffic accidents if the deaths test positive for coronavirus.

I am supposed to be outside repairing fence ...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
59 minutes ago, Arauna said:

Ah, understand...21 aminio acids combined in different DNA combinations to make different kinds of flesh/tissue.

Yes! And that is why I think the chart with the ham sandwich that JTR posted is not comparable with the chart showing fractions of blood. Because the ham sandwich is made up of ham, bread and the vegetables, so that is like the blood made up of red cells, white cells platelets and plasma. But each of those four components of blood are then fractioned into even smaller parts. So in the same way the ham, wheat/rye and tomato/lettuce should be broken down into smaller parts, like for example the ham into protein molecules, same for the other ingredients....and then it really would be unidentifiable as a ham sandwich, just like fractions of the 4 components of blood are no longer identifiable as blood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
8 hours ago, James Thomas Rook Jr. said:

Jerusalem who ate humans when

Although gory, I get the gist of your discussion above. I do think our bodies are wonderful biological machines and our healing properties exceptional. Unfortunately we often interfere with it's natural abilities by bad diet, bad practices, and so forth.

Wild animals often have severe injuries, wounds or even parasites.. and they do manage to survive. They clean their own wounds if they can with tongues which have enzymes, and  bacteria. But I know too little of mouth bacteria to really be scientific.  I have never seen a crocodile lick itself though and I am sure anything can die from the bacteria present in its mouth after getting a slight wound.  The wound will have to be properly tended.

About eating humans...... there are a number of factors to consider:  if they were killed in a air crash and a limb or body part was so severely severed that blood flowed out to make it kosher/bloodless, one could take a chance and eat it. It would be better to cook it so as to kill the human viruses and parasites before ingesting without breaking the law of jehovah - shocking as it may seem. It is not what goes into the body but what comes out which is a sin.

The fierce masaegetae tribe (who killed Cyrus the Great in battle) used to eat each other and it was considered an honor.  When a tribe member felt it was time to die, they would offer him up and make a feast. They also used to drink their horse blood - breaking the everlasting covenant given to Noah.

Siege of Jerusalem: the shock of supposedly pious Jews 'killing" their own children to eat them, not bleeding it and ingesting the blood, touching the human dead (making one unclean) and eating the unclean, was shocking! They were under Jehovahs law..... jehovah is a God of life not of death and humans are the crown of creation.

Touching the carcass of unclean animals or clean animals that died of itself was unclean  One was allowed to eat a clean animal that had died of itself and bled, one could cook and eat it and one would be unclean until evening.  Lev 11: 39 & 40. So Jehovahs laws were not draconian but the law against ingesting blood is universal...... part of everlasting covenant made  with Noah when eating flesh.  Isaiah 24:5.  Gen 9: 3- 12

Here it refers to whole blood........ but when one bleeds a dead animal there is separation in the carcass of blood and water (white and red blood) and minute bits of blood is left in the carcass.  So one would not get technical about the particles still in the carcass. It is the act of obedience to jehovah that is important..... that one respects the life of the animal and life of all persons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
50 minutes ago, Anna said:

then it really would be unidentifiable as a ham sandwich, just like fractions of the 4 components of blood are no longer identifiable as blo

(Sorry, it is hard for me to copy your entire quote with my fingers)

I have not thought of it this way before...... but it makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I missed the part Arauna referred to that in Jerusalem the people murdered their children .... somehow I had the idea that they were killed when boulders were catapulted over the city walls, or they died by enemy action. Later I will go back and re-read that account.

My ham sandwich example was intended just to be something to think about ... a rough analogy ... not a molecular dissertation.

Of course, clam chowder is made from little animals that have no arms or legs, or even eyes.

...in such a case, easier to be a victim of circumstance .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
20 minutes ago, James Thomas Rook Jr. said:

had the idea that they were killed when boulders were catapulted

That was possible too! But josephus refers to a pious woman who everyone respected before, who ate her child.

During 607 siege they also ate their children... but many were used to the pagan rituals of offering up their children in fire and were used to the smell of burning flesh to false gods.

What was bad about this is that they had no place to bury their dead in the heat...... they threw the bodies over the wall to get rid of it. And babylonian soldiers catapulted the dead bodies with swollen bellies back into the city - creating terrible pandemonium because wherever parts of bodies spattered was immediately unclean.  They must have been in a mentally very dark place. ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It appears to me that this is a key aspect of the 2030 initiative ideology. While the Rothschilds were indeed influential individuals who were able to sway governments, much like present-day billionaires, the true impetus for change stems from the omnipotent forces (Satan) shaping our world. In this case, there is a false God of this world. However, what drives action within a political framework? Power! What is unfolding before our eyes in today's world? The relentless struggle for power. The overwhelming tide of people rising. We cannot underestimate the direct and sinister influence of Satan in all of this. However, it is up to individuals to decide how they choose to worship God. Satanism, as a form of religion, cannot be regarded as a true religion. Consequently, just as ancient practices of child sacrifice had a place in God's world, such sacrifices would never be accepted by the True God of our universe. Despite the promising 2030 initiative for those involved, it is unfortunately disintegrating due to the actions of certain individuals in positions of authority. A recent incident serves as a glaring example, involving a conflict between peaceful Muslims and a Jewish representative that unfolded just this week. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/11/us-delegation-saudi-arabia-kippah?ref=upstract.com Saudi Arabia was among the countries that agreed to the initiative signed by approximately 179 nations in or around 1994. However, this initiative is now being undermined by the devil himself, who is sowing discord among the delegates due to the ongoing Jewish-Hamas (Palestine) conflict. Fostering antisemitism. What kind of sacrifice does Satan accept with the death of babies and children in places like Gaza, Ukraine, and other conflicts around the world, whether in the past or present, that God wouldn't? Whatever personal experiences we may have had with well-known individuals, true Christians understand that current events were foretold long ago, and nothing can prevent them from unfolding. What we are witnessing is the result of Satan's wrath upon humanity, as was predicted. A true religion will not involve itself in the politics of this world, as it is aware of the many detrimental factors associated with such engagement. It understands the true intentions of Satan for this world and wisely chooses to stay unaffected by them.
    • This idea that Satan can put Jews in power implies that God doesn't want Jews in power. But that would also imply that God only wants "Christians" including Hitler, Biden, Pol Pot, Chiang Kai-Shek, etc. 
    • @Mic Drop, I don't buy it. I watched the movie. It has all the hallmarks of the anti-semitic tropes that began to rise precipitously on social media during the last few years - pre-current-Gaza-war. And it has similarities to the same anti-semitic tropes that began to rise in Europe in the 900's to 1100's. It was back in the 500s AD/CE that many Khazars failed to take or keep land they fought for around what's now Ukraine and southern Russia. Khazars with a view to regaining power were still being driven out into the 900's. And therefore they migrated to what's now called Eastern Europe. It's also true that many of their groups converted to Judaism after settling in Eastern Europe. It's possibly also true that they could be hired as mercenaries even after their own designs on empire had dwindled.  But I think the film takes advantage of the fact that so few historical records have ever been considered reliable by the West when it comes to these regions. So it's easy to fill the vacuum with some very old antisemitic claims, fables, rumors, etc..  The mention of Eisenhower in the movie was kind of a giveaway, too. It's like, Oh NO! The United States had a Jew in power once. How on earth could THAT have happened? Could it be . . . SATAN??" Trying to tie a connection back to Babylonian Child Sacrifice Black Magick, Secret Satanism, and Baal worship has long been a trope for those who need to think that no Jews like the Rothschilds and Eisenhowers (????) etc would not have been able to get into power in otherwise "Christian" nations without help from Satan.    Does child sacrifice actually work to gain power?? Does drinking blood? Does pedophilia??? (also mentioned in the movie) Yes, it's an evil world and many people have evil ideologies based on greed and lust and ego. But how exactly does child sacrifice or pedophilia or drinking blood produce a more powerful nation or cabal of some kind? To me that's a giveaway that the authors know that the appeal will be to people who don't really care about actual historical evidence. Also, the author(s) of the video proved that they have not done much homework, but are just trying to fill that supposed knowledge gap by grasping at old paranoid and prejudicial premises. (BTW, my mother and grandmother, in 1941 and 1942, sat next to Dwight Eisenhower's mother at an assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower family had been involved in a couple of "Christian" religions and a couple of them associated with IBSA and JWs for many years.)
  • Members

    • b4ucuhear

      b4ucuhear 312

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,381

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      158.9k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,670
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Apolos2000
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.