Jump to content
The World News Media

Overlooked by the Religion News Service—How Can That Be?


TrueTomHarley

Recommended Posts

  • Member

I only up vote or down vote an individual comment, not the person whom made the comment. 

If I can find sense and reasoning in a comment, even though i might not totally agree with the comment, i might up vote it. It does no harm, this is only a forum not the coming Judgement. 

I do feel sorry for Arauna though, with her OCD about OCD. It reminds me of when the GB said concerning Child Sexual Abuse accusations, that the accusations only came from Apostates. 

Maybe the whole CCJW / W/t have OCD about apostates and oposers :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 2.4k
  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It is funny that JWs say that the CCJW in no part of the world. BUT, then when CSA is mentioned JWs say, yes but it's everywhere in the world.   

According to Jesus' words, we are being judged by the inclinations of our heart.  I am happy that both God and Christ are merciful and that whomever is judging me knows more about me than i know

Can anyone exercise their conscience without the ability to think independently?   "But a spirit of independent thinking does not prevail in God’s organization, and we have sound reasons for conf

Posted Images

  • Member

It should not be much of a big deal, granted there are other denominations out there that are not listed, however, they do pop up in some stories and the like. Some religious news websites, however, need to be accessed with a deal of caution.

 

That being said, among other things, there is always and will forever be stupid people out there, who can bark, but cannot bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 5/11/2020 at 1:37 AM, James Thomas Rook Jr. said:

As of today, I only have 3666 "upvotes".

I understand that when I get 10,000 "upvotes", I get an all expense paid trip to Hawaii !

Well, after the Coronavirus is over, which will be around 2021, however, some are going overboard by saying 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 5/11/2020 at 11:17 AM, 4Jah2me said:

Maybe the whole CCJW / W/t have OCD about apostates and oposers :) 

It has been my observation that WE ALL have OCD, about things that we feel strongly about ...

It's similar to the old joke,

QUESTION:  "What is a cult?"

ANSWER:  "It's the church down the street from YOUR church."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
5 minutes ago, James Thomas Rook Jr. said:

It has been my observation that WE ALL have OCD, about things that we feel strongly about ...

It's similar to the old joke,

QUESTION:  "What is a cult?"

ANSWER:  "It's the church down the street from YOUR church."

Not everyone. But as I stated to you and others here before, they do not know what a "cult" actually is.  If you are against the Trinity, you are part of a cult, if you say Jesus is not God, you are part of a cult, if you like dogs over cats, you are part of a cult. If you, as God is my witness, put french fries in ice you, you sir, are part of a cult.

The irony of it all, there is no justification, it is merely a one-shot claim to evade discussion and or to assume that you are better than the latter.

Yes, there are many churches, but the question is, of which church, be it organized or not, is following the True Church? As stated years back, Trinitarianism is on the decline and as a result of this, there is an uptick in trying to convert such into said faith, hence why the so called "WAR" is ongoing, even harder as it is now, since now colleges and universities are involved and the fact confusion has led to the formulation of more atheists and more people adhere to today's so called norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
7 minutes ago, James Thomas Rook Jr. said:

I see, Space Merchant,  that you feel very strongly about that ....

I feel strongly about that because of the experience I had mentioned before of what a cult actually is and what it is about. As all things pertaining to Christianity, the claims can be absurd at times, and annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
28 minutes ago, 4Jah2me said:

@Space Merchant Quote " Yes, there are many churches, but the question is, of which church, be it organized or not, is following the True Church? "

The 'True Church' is surely the Anointed ones that are the Body of Christ. The 'Spiritual Jew'. So how do we know who they are ? 

 

As I had told everyone here, even before your time, The True Church is the Early Apostolic Church. And nearly over a dozen times I had stated this, that such people, Christians, whomever they are, strive to be like this church to the letter, as is with some working towards that. It is not an easy task due to the fact the more one attempts this path, the difficulty increases, as is with persecution, etc. This church is the one often attacked, and ridiculed by the so called war I am referring to, Trinitarianism vs. Non-Trinitarianism, and some of us are the types to not be so keen on misinformation when the facts are there. Granted, it is one of those reasons when this forum was originally a battle zone, I am the way I have always been since CSE, which is somewhat of a debating zone in regards to Biblical History.

That being said, the church church, as I had told many, even Witness, consist of the chosen ones and the followers of the Christ. Although she mixed up the information in one of our discussions, one cannot go around that notion in regards to True Christianity in the face of mainstream Christianity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  • Members

    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,410

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.