Jump to content
The World News Media

Recommended Posts

  • Member
3 hours ago, Dmitar said:

ake example with the poster Witness. This individual venerates a blogger. By that determination, that person is a spiritual leader to Witness. Another thing you have not considered; a "gathering" The implication of a gathering is two or three individuals. If that is established as it is done here by @Srecko Sostar, @Witness, @Patiently waiting for Truth, you have formed an unintentional church.

I doubt very much that Heb 10:25 can be applied to the three of us on any given day.  

As far as "venerating a blogger", this is answer I have provided for someone on reddit, and I've shared Luke 22:24-27 with you in the past.  

You know, I came out of a religion that required obedience to men.  Luke 22:24-27 defines the rulership of the governing body (“friends of the people/benefactors”)  and elder body (“Gentiles”/nations)…perfectly.  Jesus told his disciples, “it is not to be that way among you”.  But if you notice these scriptures also point out that the “leader” is the one who serves – serves what?  The truth in Christ’s teachings – not the doctrine of men, the pestilence existing in the organization.   The GB fulfill the role of the “wicked slave” of Matt 24:48-51.  They beat down all who have a token of truth deposited in their heart at their anointing.  (Matt 25:19-21; Rom 5;5; 1 John 2:27)

The GB relish obedience to whatever they may dish out, and the “Gentile” “kings”/elders make sure that JWs follow their outlined feeding program. This is slavery.  Matt 6:24; 2 Cor 11:20; Gal 1:10

 The apostles were leaders in truth – leading people to Jesus Christ.  They were not human leaders over men and women, expecting full dedication to a human instead of to Jesus Christ; human leaders who decide that those under them must submit their "time" in the preaching work, or they must be registered as members of the organization...or they must not balk at any direction from the elder body or "slave".    

“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God, since it is written, He catches the wise in their craftiness; 20 and again, The Lord knows that the reasonings of the wise are futile. 21 So let no one boast in human leaders, for everything is yours— 22 whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or things present or things to come—everything is yours, 23 and you belong to Christ, and Christ belongs to God.”  1 Cor 3:19-23

Anyone can question Pearl about her teachings and she will answer them directly, supplying them with God’s word/scriptures so they make up their own mind. (Isa 59:20,21; Mal 3:1-4; Matt 17:11; Rev 11:1-3; Acts 17:10,11)

“Truly I tell you, whoever receives anyone I send receives me, and the one who receives me receives him who sent me.”  John 13:20

 

“There is one who speaks rashly,
like a piercing sword;
but the tongue of the wise brings healing.”  Prov 12:18 – Matt 7:18; Rev 22;1-3

http://pearl-obeymen.blogspot.com/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 2.8k
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Being an ex-JW is not a bad thing. It is not a sin. Because it is plain to see that God and Christ do not work through the JW Org, and do not work through the GB. 

@Witness  What fellowship should I have here? 1 Corinthians 15:33 Paul is talking about those people with whom we associate or fellowship. We tend to take on the character of the group with

You know, I am a great admirer of William Jefferson Clinton, former President of the United States to the extent of his skill at lying better than anybody else I’ve ever seen, with a smile, and with a

Posted Images

  • Member
4 hours ago, Witness said:

I doubt very much that Heb 10:25 can be applied to the three of us on any given day.  

As far as "venerating a blogger", this is answer I have provided for someone on reddit, and I've shared Luke 22:24-27 with you in the past.  

I fail to see the difference given the definition.

4 hours ago, Witness said:

You know, I came out of a religion that required obedience to men.  Luke 22:24-27 defines the rulership of the governing body (“friends of the people/benefactors”)  and elder body (“Gentiles”/nations)…perfectly. 

God and Christ demand that of us, not men, even though that was the purpose to descend, Jesus a spirit as a man. Therefore, we are obligated as Christians to listen to that man if we wish to remain in his fellowship.

5 hours ago, Witness said:

The GB relish obedience to whatever they may dish out, and the “Gentile” “kings”/elders make sure that JWs follow their outlined feeding program. This is slavery.

I fail to see how projecting your personal feelings amounts to following in Jesus footsteps.

5 hours ago, Witness said:

The apostles were leaders in truth – leading people to Jesus Christ.  They were not human leaders over men and women, expecting full dedication to a human instead of to Jesus Christ

You would think, any Christian leader would exercise being humble and responsible. Where can you find a perfect man to commission leaders today? Isn't that the truth spoken in scripture?

5 hours ago, Witness said:

Anyone can question Pearl about her teachings and she will answer them directly, supplying them with God’s word/scriptures so they make up their own mind.

Spiritual leaders should have access where a concern is deemed necessary. How many personal conversations do you think the Pope has in a day, if it isn't indirectly mentioned to him by his Cardinals or Bishops?

I see no difference with a structured organization. Why should any Christian have a problem with that. It was conducted in the first century church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@Witness 

What fellowship should I have here?

1 Corinthians 15:33 Paul is talking about those people with whom we associate or fellowship. We tend to take on the character of the group with which we associate. If we associate with people of bad character, they will succeed in pulling us down to their level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
29 minutes ago, Dmitar said:

@Witness 

What fellowship should I have here?

1 Corinthians 15:33 Paul is talking about those people with whom we associate or fellowship. We tend to take on the character of the group with which we associate. If we associate with people of bad character, they will succeed in pulling us down to their level.

Did that happen to Jesus Christ?  Did it happen to the apostles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 hour ago, Dmitar said:

What fellowship should I have here?

What I'm trying to say is, this forum is not an ice-cream social.  Perhaps there are a few who are seeking fellowship; but surely you notice that it is battle of beliefs - of truth against lies.  Jesus, the apostles, the prophets -  all "associated" with people of bad character in the sense of bringing them their message.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
42 minutes ago, Witness said:

Did that happen to Jesus Christ?  Did it happen to the apostles?

What lesson should we gather from that. Once again, what fellowship is worthy here?

4 minutes ago, Witness said:

Did it happen to ANY of the prophets sent by God? 

Then why be quarrelsome about spiritual leaders if you indeed accept all men but one are imperfect, yet, God saw fit to use those imperfect men. God is not a God of confusion, neither should Christ followers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 minute ago, Witness said:

What I'm trying to say is, this forum is not an ice-cream social.  Perhaps there are a few who are seeking fellowship; but surely you notice that it is battle of beliefs - of truth against lies.  Jesus, the apostles, the prophets -  all "associated" with people of bad character in the sense of bringing them their message.  

What should that message be? To behave as the world does? What kind of message are we giving here? The message of Christ or the message of the AntiChrist?

It is simple to recite scripture. Does, that really serve a purpose when the heart is not set in righteousness? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

@Patiently waiting for Truth

What I find interesting is, you have confidence in the Berean Bible Society, which is very noticeable since they are promoted by Google for easy access. Yet, this institute, as I stated before is a branch from the Berean Bible Institute which in turn were affiliated with the Bible Student Association. They also have another branch called the Berean Bible Fellowship.

Therefore, you are becoming more associated with the Bible Student Association Theology. You might consider contacting them for fellowship. They might be more your inclination. They are willing to look the other way, when God’s Laws can’t. A trait only too familiar here among Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Our great commission What is it (1974, Berean Bible Society)

AGREEMENT AND DISAGREEMENT

There are few, if any, major Bible subjects on which all of the denominations and sects of Christendom are agreed. There is one, however, on which almost all of them agree.

The vast majority of fundamentalists, neo-evangelicals, modernists and Roman Catholics, along with practically all of the cults, agree that the so-called 94 great commissions containing our Lord's parting commands to His eleven apostles, contains God's program for the Church today. Or, to be more specific: Most "Christians," nominal or genuine, believe that our Lord, during the forty days between His resurrection and ascension, instructed His apostles concerning His program for the Church today, and they all call these instructions "the great commission," or "His parting commands," or "our marching orders."

 It is sad indeed that at this late date God's people, and even their spiritual leaders, remain in disagreement on so important a subject as to what God would have us do and teach. This is written in the year 1974 A.D., and still the 13 Church does not know what its great commission is! This is because the so called "great commission" is so rarely examined and expounded. Rather it is mentioned, referred to, and phrases from the record taken out of context as topics for sermons!

In writing of “The Great Blunder of the Church” we are giving special attention to the great blunder of confusing and mixing the hope, calling and program of Israel, with the hope, calling and program of the Church, which is designated, “the Body of Christ.” Many have been taught the great blunder of mixing law and grace, which mixture produces a perverted gospel which subverts the soul. But the great blunder, to which we refer, which includes frustrating the grace of God by bringing into the reign of grace some of Israel’s program from under the reign of law, goes far beyond that. Many spiritual “grace” preachers, who would never intentionally mix law and grace, do mix the “kingdom of heaven” program, in the Synoptic Gospels and in the Book of Acts, with the program designated “the dispensation of the grace of God.” They also have failed to rightly divide the Word of Truth as to the different ministries of Peter and Paul, as stated in Galatians 2:7 to 9.

 

 *** w74 2/15 pp. 123-124 par. 17 Widening Out in Our Love for Mankind ***

17 In view of the far greater danger in which humans are today, should we think that our responsibility for the lives of people is less than Ezekiel’s? Surely not! The commission to preach and make disciples given by Jesus Christ over nineteen centuries ago was to continue in force “until the conclusion of the system of things.” (Matt. 28:19, 20) Do you keenly sense your responsibility in carrying out this commission?

Perhaps you can see the similarities while thinking about the differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my perspective, when the Smithsonian Magazine covers a topic, I am inclined to trust their expertise. As for the shadows here, I see no benefit in entertaining irrational ideas from others. Let them hold onto their own beliefs. We shouldn't further enable their self-deception and misleading of the public.  
    • Hey Self! 🤣I came across this interesting conspiracy theory. There are scholars who firmly believe in the authenticity of those artifacts. I value having conversations with myself. The suggestion of a mentally ill person has led to the most obscure manifestation of a group of sorrowful individuals. 😁
    • I have considered all of their arguments. Some even apply VAT 4956 to their scenarios, which is acceptable. Anyone can use secular evidence if they genuinely seek understanding. Nonetheless, whether drawing from scripture or secular history, 607 is a plausible timeframe to believe in. People often misuse words like "destruction", "devastation", and "desolation" in an inconsistent manner, similar to words like "besiege", "destroy", and "sack". When these terms are misapplied to man-made events, they lose their true meaning. This is why with past historians, the have labeled it as follows: First Capture of Jerusalem 606 BC Second Capture of Jerusalem 598 BC Third Capture of Jerusalem 587 BC Without taking into account anything else.  Regarding the second account, if we solely rely on secular chronology, the ancient scribes made military adaptations to align with the events recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles. However, the question arises: Can we consider this adaptation as accurate?  Scribes sought to include military components in their stories rather than focusing solely on biblical aspects. Similarly, astronomers, who were also scholars, made their observations at the king's request to divine omens, rather than to understand the plight of the Jewish people. Regarding the third capture, we can only speculate because there are no definitive tablets like the Babylonian chronicles that state 598. It is possible that before the great tribulation, Satan will have influenced someone to forge more Babylonian chronicles in order to discredit the truth and present false evidence from the British Museum, claiming that the secular view was right all along. This could include documents supposedly translated after being found in 1935, while others were found in the 1800s. The Jewish antiquities authorities have acknowledged the discovery of forged items, while the British Museum has not made similar acknowledgments. It is evident that the British Museum has been compelled to confess to having looted or stolen artifacts which they are unwilling to return. Consequently, I find it difficult to place my trust in the hands of those who engage in such activities. One of the most notable instances of deception concerning Jewish antiquities was the widely known case of the ossuary belonging to James, the brother of Jesus. I was astonished by the judge's inexplicable justification for acquittal, as it was evident that his primary concern was preserving the reputation of the Jewish nation, rather than unearthing the truth behind the fraudulent artifact. The judge before even acknowledged it. "In his decision, the judge was careful to say his acquittal of Golan did not mean the artifacts were necessarily genuine, only that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Golan had faked them." The burden of proof is essential. This individual not only forged the "Jehoash Tablet," but also cannot be retried for his deceit. Why are they so insistent on its authenticity? To support their narrative about the first temple of Jerusalem. Anything to appease the public, and deceive God. But then again, after the Exodus, when did they truly please God? So, when it comes to secular history, it's like a game of cat and mouse.  
    • I'm not bothered by being singled out, as you seem to be accustomed to defending and protecting yourselves, but it's a good idea to keep your dog on a leash. Speaking of which, in a different thread, TTH mentioned that it would be great if everyone here shared their life stories. As both of you are the librarians here, I kindly ask you to minimize any signs of intimidation or insincerity. It is you people who need to be "banned" here. However, it is quite evident that you hold a negative influence, which God recognizes, therefore you are banned from your own conscience in His eyes.
  • Members

    • Linda S.

      Linda S. 4

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pudgy

      Pudgy 2,410

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CBell

      CBell 3

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.4k
    • Total Posts
      159.4k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,679
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Techredirector
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.