Jump to content

Time to ban dimtar.


Matthew9969

Recommended Posts


  • Views 2.4k
  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Surely he will respond to love and acceptance. How’s that project going anyway?

Though it has been explained many times just how a person gets banned, along with who does it, along with who favors that action and who doesn’t—there is just no point in repeating it. There is just s

It's impossible to have a logical discussion anymore due to this jack ass. Can the mods please send it a warning or ban it?

Posted Images

  • Member
16 minutes ago, Matthew9969 said:

It's impossible to have a logical discussion anymore due to this jack ass. Can the mods please send it a warning or ban it?

I'd just put him on ignore. I've already got a lot of people on ignore. Occasionally I'll see what barking madness they're up to, but I'm not into banning people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 1/11/2022 at 9:46 PM, Matthew9969 said:

It's impossible to have a logical discussion anymore due to this jack ass. Can the mods please send it a warning or ban it?

I don't like the idea of banning anyone. In fact, most of "Dmitar's" divisive and contentious interference in discussions is already the direct result of his having been banned several times in the past.

He was already banned under one of the original sets of names he used here (Allen Smith) and this made him so angry that he has continually come back with alternate names. Many of those names/accounts have also been banned. I stopped counting after about 40 of his alternate names. A few of his alternate names have rarely been used except to up-vote his own accounts and down-vote members who he doesn't like or who have exposed him in any way. Most of those names are still available to him because they have never been banned.

It's one of the reasons I never recommend banning anyone. If his "Dmitar" account were banned, his usual practice is to start a new account, or re-activate one or more of these other accounts and come back even more contentiously and with more hostility. For bringing up this idea, you, @Matthew9969, could then expect 40 or 50 down-votes on things you have said in the past, and to have most of your future posts "stalked" for down-votes and probably anything he can think of that will cause strife and dissension. If you don't respond in the exasperated manner he expects, you can count on several weeks of false attacks claiming that you did react inappropriately.

He puts a lot more energy into his posts than most people realize. Because of exposing him again here, he will likely do what he usually does: display a lot of egotism, envy, hostility, jealousy, fits of anger, stirring up trouble, divisions, etc. When he notices that his own anger might be a giveaway of his personality, he will begin to accuse others almost randomly of many of the same things he has been exposed for doing. In fact, almost comically, this means that if he has been exposed for "projection," he will then begin accusing others of projection, too. For anything that he has been rightfully accused of, he will hold a longstanding grudge and make sure he accuses his exposers with the same words.

So, what I'm trying to say is that banning just doesn't work. It just results in more and more projection, blame-shifting, and passive aggressive hostility, which has often blown up into real abusive hostility, which then gets him banned and then he starts the cycle all over again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
23 minutes ago, JW Insider said:

It just results in more and more projection, blame-shifting, and passive aggressive hostility, which has often blown up into real abusive hostility, which then gets him banned and then he starts the cycle all over again.  

Surely he will respond to love and acceptance. How’s that project going anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
20 hours ago, JW Insider said:

I don't like the idea of banning anyone

Someone liked the idea of banning me. NO warning, just d/fed from the forum. 

I would really love to have full information as to who banned me, who reported me, and excatly what WORDS I was banned for using.  It's soooo easy to pretend that i threatend someone without giving the exact words I used. It is JW Elder tactics. That's why i say this forum is run by JW Elders.  I do believe that JWs in position of 'responsibility' spy on this forum and other forums and use them as a measuring stick for feelings of ex-JWs. 

As for Dimmy, she is fun. Let her rant because she can be a great sounding board. Some of her questions can help a person do more research. Rambo is similar, though they could be one and the same person. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
On 1/12/2022 at 8:18 AM, TrueTomHarley said:

Surely he will respond to love and acceptance. How’s that project going anyway?

You mean by having a person in high places that allows the abuse from you Jehovah's Witnesses, and muzzles the one, and only you love to HATE. Yeah, I can see it being all the complainers and hypocrites here's, fault. When abuse is met with abuse, it isn't unacceptable. When abuse is met with kindness, it's unacceptable. What Jehovah's Witnesses and former Jehovah’s Witnesses hate the most, is having someone show visitors the evil that dwells within, from both sides. Then BAN BAN BAN. Everyone comes out of darkness to criticize without the ability to rebuttal, like Cowards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
5 hours ago, TrueTomHarley said:

“To everything (ban ban ban) there is a season (ban ban ban) and a time for every purpose under heaven.”

Come come. You must behave. Though the same can be said of several others.

Oh, Here! We go. I must behave when others don't, yet they are still here. The sign of BAN! BAN! BAN! To the one people here love to hate. Regardless if they are Jehovah's Witnesses or former Jehovah's Witnesses. The band of unity for a common cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I dunno. The trick would be to persuade them they really are assets and not just the next UN NGO bright idea.
    • Of course, Bitcoin is about believing in an irrational fantasy … much like Santa Clause controlling the global economy in the month of December. Or the true value of U.S. Currency, with a 33 TRILLION DOLLAR NATIONAL DEBT!! Let's start from the beginning to calculate the length of a string of one hundred dollar bills that would equal 33 trillion dollars. First, let's find out how many one hundred dollar bills are in 33 trillion dollars: 33 trillion dollars = 33,000,000,000,000 dollars Number of one hundred dollar bills = 33,000,000,000,000 / 100 = 330,000,000,000, or 3.3 x 10^11 one hundred dollar bills. Now, let's calculate the length of a single one hundred dollar bill. The dimensions of a U.S. one hundred dollar bill are approximately 2.61 inches in width and 6.14 inches in length. To convert the length to miles, we'll divide by 63,360 (since there are 63,360 inches in a mile): Length of a single one hundred dollar bill = 6.14 inches / 63,360 ≈ 0.0000966 miles. Now, let's find the total length of the string of one hundred dollar bills: Total length = (3.3 x 10^11 one hundred dollar bills) x (0.0000966 miles per bill) Total length ≈ 31,878,000 miles. So, a string of one hundred dollar bills that would equal 33 trillion dollars is approximately 31,878,000 miles long. The result of the division 31,878,000 miles, divided by 240,000 miles, is 132.825. 240,000 miles is the approximate distance from the Earth to the Moon. So, the USA National Debt is a line of One Hundred Dollar Bills stretching 132 times PAST the distance from the Earth to the Moon !!!!! …  swoon “thunk”. …. Pudgycoin looking better to you now?
    • Especially in this age when more and more people are shopping on line, there will always be a high demand for card board boxes. That’s why my digital currency of choice is Pudgycoin …. the only digital currency based on corrugated cardboard. AND it comes in a convenient ten pound box, for easy identification. So trusted that there are no financial records to see, and one Pudgycoin is ALWAYS worth what we imagine it to be. Available at the Empire Hancock Building Penthouse Offices, where six diving boards means there is never any wait, and selected Veterinarians, and Pet Supply Stores, in some towns. Remember “Pudgycoin!, … If Things Get Really Bad, You Can Eat Them!”.
    • Someone responded to me today with this quote re: Bitcoin... made me smile. 😉 I actually wouldn't be surprised if Bethel is starting to allocate some holdings in Bitcoin as a way of preserving their assets against local governments around the world after Russia essentially just stole the Branch office. Multisig wallets across continents with many wallet addresses and hidden directors from various countries would make sense. Lawyers would have a very hard time tracking assets they don't even know exist under corporate structures and trusts they also don't know exist. 
    • The new fund will provide direct exposure to Bitcoin The fund will be managed by Nomura’s digital asset and blockchain venture arm Laser Capital Bringing more institutional capital into Bitcoin is one of the most important new catalysts on the horizon for future price appreciation and widespread adoption of Bitcoin as its own asset class If Japan follows a similar trend to the United States then this new Bitcoin fund will likely set off a domino effect of other investment banks and asset managers wanting to launch their own Japan has recently been changing their attitude towards crypto and even announced a new proposal for certain types of businesses to be able to issue crypto assets instead of equity when raising capital https://www.thenew.money/article/japans-biggest-bank-is-coming-for-crypto
  • Members

    • Snowden-Jk

      Snowden-Jk 0

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      65.1k
    • Total Posts
      154k
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      17,559
    • Most Online
      1,592

    Newest Member
    Ry1
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.