George88

I will expose fake Jehovah's Witnesses like you and those in the closed club who disrespect God by using his name in a blasphemous manner. Does that sufficiently address the question posed by a foolish person? Pudgy
What is the reason for starting another conflict, or is it that Tom is unable to control his dog?

We often speculate without evidence, but this should not lead us to infer falsehoods. This is the devil's deceptive tactic and is designed to conceal the truth with lies.
If we dare to assert that there is no devil, we can find evidence to support the idea of where humanity inherited sin from since there is a devil.

That's undeniable. It appears that's how Tom utilizes it for conducting research for his books. It seems he grew weary of venturing into apostate sites as Vic the parrot to gather information. Nonetheless, the Watchtower has more important matters to attend to than browsing through purported fake sites. That's why they simply advise "true" followers to avoid apostate or fake sites, much like this one.

I don't mind having conversations with anyone. However, I strongly oppose those who choose to behave with disrespect and incivility. They will face the consequences of their actions. I have no trouble confronting people and calling them out for their disrespectful behavior.

I incorporate biblical guidance into my daily life in various ways. This is particularly important for me when dealing with foolish individuals.
James 5:20 New International Version
20 remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the error of their way will save them from death and cover over a multitude of sins.
What justifications do people provide for your behavior here, especially those that call themselves JWs? What are you advocating for? What advantages are you providing? In the realm of the Bible, the focus lies not on one's self, but rather on the contributions one can make to others as devoted disciples of Christ.
Before embarking on your journey to teach scripture, it is crucial to learn, seek counsel and guidance from scripture to ensure you approach it in the right manner.

I'm not referring to hardened apostates who are beyond redemption or to disfellowshipped individuals who have already lost their souls. These foolish individuals have sealed their fate before God.
Since their lives didn't matter to them, it sure doesn't matter to me.

By the way, when you posted the article on Russell, what did you do, if not "cut" and "paste." Learn to think!

By the way, when you posted the article on Russell, what did you do, if not "cut" and "paste." Learn to think!

Tom, let me clarify something. I refuse to bear the blame for the situation, it's your associates who are responsible. You have completely misjudged me. I treat others based on how they treat me. If Pete, Srecko, or James choose to insult me, they are the ones initiating it, not me. Understand this clearly. The only contrast is, you, JWI and whoever is controlling this site have the power to ban people because you want to protect your illusion of a perfect environment.
Stop insinuating that you are the victims here. In reality, people like me are the victims. How many hundreds have you banned over the course of a decade to protect apostates, the disfellowshipped, disgruntled witnesses, and James? If you want to continue down this path, remember that you can't critique without being critiqued.
I may have a multitude of complaints surpassing those of all of you combined, yet I have made a conscious decision to adhere to God's commands and the teachings of Christ. Nothing in this world should hold a more steadfast position in one's pursuit of salvation.

It is disheartening that individuals continue to affirm the validity of the original post. Even those who support Satan fail to speak the truth; they simply prefer to behave in a reprehensible manner, further confirming the point raised.

I will expose fake Jehovah's Witnesses like you and those in the closed club who disrespect God by using his name in a blasphemous manner. Does that sufficiently address the question posed by a foolish person? Pudgy
What is the reason for starting another conflict, or is it that Tom is unable to control his dog?

JWI was on the verge of doing so but couldn’t find your card in the card catalogue—none of which would have happened had he heeded my urging to modernize.

Why do you think I stick around James? You're my entertainment. But at least I'm truthful. By the way, thanks for saying "WE" now I know to include you in the list of librarians as well as "Witness" the Pearl Doxsey lover.

I'm not intimidated by you or JWI just because you both happen to be librarians. If you're angry enough to ban me, just like you have done to countless others who speak the truth and disrupt your research with apostates, then go ahead. You're just one clique away.
You should really be directing that sentiment towards Pudgy and making sure to keep him on a leash.

“Bad dog, bad! No biscuit!”

Actually the four heads belong to you, with your sock puppets, Matthew, Pete, Srecko, and whoever else you conjure up at Satan's request. You have no game old man. Never did, never will.
Do not deny your involvement if I am blamed for being deleted because of you, as you frequently do. People support you despite your role in the situation, just as they defend their own flawed behavior. They may claim to be JWs, but God does not see them as such. Despite being a supposedly JW-friendly site, it still welcomes apostates and those who have been disfellowshipped, including yourself. It is foolish to stand up for such actions.
Also, don't continue with that ad-hominem nonsense, it's lame since your insults go beyond that with your vulgar words that you and others seem to get away with here are far worse. However, there are no consequences for people who allow themselves to be deceived by individuals who were once elders or ministerial servants. These individuals may not hold any value to God, yet they persist in making false claims.
Furthermore, individuals who utilize various aliases to return and prevent the perpetuation of deception on this platform are exposing its true nature. This site is not visitor-friendly; instead, it is a disgraceful haven for disgruntled witnesses who hold no significance. It is not the fault of these individuals that you and others make extensive efforts to obstruct them. As you are not banned, you are entitled to retain your username.
It's unclear why you decided to change your handle from JTR to Pudgy, unless it was due to legal reasons or embarrassment from being caught. However, for those who wish to come back to this site with a different handle, the decision to do so despite facing unnecessary security measures ultimately lies with them.

Why were you arrested for distribution of child pornography if it wasn't true? The truth cannot be erased. It seems unlikely that the government would go through such lengths to arrest you for something that is untrue. Deny that your arrest was not justified. Challenge the validity of the cause of your arrest.
You want to act like a disgusting animal with me, then I'll treat you like an uncivilized disgusting lowlife that you are. That's truth.
I just did with your lie about me saying it but its not true comment, prove me wrong.

Imagine if people knew the kind of person you truly are and still defended you. Your charges and current status speak for themselves. If speaking the truth gets me banned and others choose to support a loudmouth like you, it says more about them than it does about me. Someone else will surely step up in my place.
Like I said, you want to get nasty with me, I'll treat like the lowlife that you have always been.

A billion words can't change your ignorant viewpoint on semantics, but who cares, it's only you, a disfellowshipped nobody and a poor excuse of a human being.

By the way with your last insulting comment. I can say the same thing about you, pedo.

Pudgy, I'm afraid the illustration cannot be retracted. Doing so would only serve to further undermine your credibility, making the situation even more regrettable than it already is for you.
You can attempt to defend yourself, but your excuse will remain feeble. You shared your poignant cartoon. Take responsibility for your actions and accept the fact that you are completely ignorant about Pastor Russell and even less knowledgeable about scripture. It is evident that you excel at being a puppet of Satan.

"WHAT IS TRUTH?" - Charles Taze Russell

“This question is one which every sincere Christian should ask and seek to answer….
…..A truth presented by Satan himself is just as true as a truth stated by God.”
Only a Liberal agenda driven Moron could misunderstand THAT.
It means EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS !!

Somehow, I was certain that you would appear and manipulate individual words to convey agreement. You never fail to deliver.
How can you convince a rational individual that the words spoken by the father of deception can be truthful without Satan resorting to trickery? How can you effectively challenge the teachings of Christ, a contradiction that is necessary to gain acceptance from your specific audience?
Take control of the ball as it now rests on your side of the court.
By the way, I'd like to share an example from John 8:44 that I find intriguing. There's a particular phrase that caught my attention: "for there is no truth in him." So, question the teachings of Christ. Recall the advice that Jesus gave to Satan to assist you.

If you can't recall the passage @Srecko Sostar, it can be found in Matthew 4. The question arises, did Jesus comprehend that Satan was speaking lies or was he deceiving Jesus with a partial truth? One would assume that people would understand that the Earth and all of its kingdoms ultimately belong to God. Satan is merely the current caretaker. Therefore, could he truly give away something that he only has temporary possession of? Furthermore, if Jesus had accepted ownership of something that did not belong to Satan in the first place, what would have been the outcome for both Christ and Satan in the eyes of God? It's a matter worth considering. Think about it carefully and don't focus on your puppet master pudgy.

What makes it any different to you? It's like asking if Satan, the father of all lies, is capable of telling the truth. You're looking at wording rather than action. Humanity was granted a capacity or ability by Satan, which is now resulting in a consequence. However, how can we ignore this fact in order to justify its rationality?